Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit:
> I read somewhere that code compiled with -fPIC is a little larger and
> slower. Is this the only reson for that policy requirement? If not,
> please give me for some information/pointers on that requirement.
I think that is mostly so.
With
Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit:
> I read somewhere that code compiled with -fPIC is a little larger and
> slower. Is this the only reson for that policy requirement? If not,
> please give me for some information/pointers on that requirement.
I think that is mostly so.
Wit
Hello,
I'm looking to become a Debian developer, I've already been packaging
Kopete passively for a bit, sponsored by Sean Perry, which is currently
waiting for KDE 3 to go into Sid.
Now I'm looking for a sponsor for KMencoder, a KDE front-end to
MEncoder. Attached is the ITP.
I've uploaded alp
On Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 03:41:46AM -0700, Michael Cardenas wrote:
> I would just like to ask if anyone would be interested in looking at
> my debs and checking them out. The only warning I get from lintian is
> executable-not-elf-or-script for a bunch of gifs and java classes in
> the limewire deb
You don't say what these packages are or why they should go into Debian. It
is unlikely people will be interested in looking at your packages until you
have done this. Please see http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp about filing an
ITP bug against the 'wnpp' pseudo-package for each of your packages
On Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 06:30:17PM +0200, Till Gerken wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think this question has been asked before, but the archive search
> didn't really reveal anything meaningful.
>
> I intend to package KMencoder, which is a front-end to MEncoder for KDE.
> MEncoder in turn is a part of M
On Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 08:23:13PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> Hi Michael!
>
> You wrote:
>
> > So, I looked at the wnpp list and found limewire, which is a good fit
> > for me because I've worked on gnutella a lot. I have a deb package
> > made for it, which can be found on my website, hyperp
Hi Michael!
You wrote:
> So, I looked at the wnpp list and found limewire, which is a good fit
> for me because I've worked on gnutella a lot. I have a deb package
> made for it, which can be found on my website, hyperpoem.net, in the
> right hand side bar.
IIRC, limewire was already ITPed a f
Hi, gurus!
The Debian policy says:
] 11.2 Libraries
]
] All libraries must have a shared version in the lib* package and a
] static version in the lib*-dev package. The shared version must be
] compiled with -fPIC, and the static version must not be. In other
] words, each *.c file will need to
Hello,
I'm looking to become a Debian developer, I've already been packaging
Kopete passively for a bit, sponsored by Sean Perry, which is currently
waiting for KDE 3 to go into Sid.
Now I'm looking for a sponsor for KMencoder, a KDE front-end to
MEncoder. Attached is the ITP.
I've uploaded alph
On Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 03:41:46AM -0700, Michael Cardenas wrote:
> I would just like to ask if anyone would be interested in looking at
> my debs and checking them out. The only warning I get from lintian is
> executable-not-elf-or-script for a bunch of gifs and java classes in
> the limewire deb.
On Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 08:23:13PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> Hi Michael!
>
> You wrote:
>
> > So, I looked at the wnpp list and found limewire, which is a good fit
> > for me because I've worked on gnutella a lot. I have a deb package
> > made for it, which can be found on my website, hyperpo
Hi Michael!
You wrote:
> So, I looked at the wnpp list and found limewire, which is a good fit
> for me because I've worked on gnutella a lot. I have a deb package
> made for it, which can be found on my website, hyperpoem.net, in the
> right hand side bar.
IIRC, limewire was already ITPed a fe
Hi, gurus!
The Debian policy says:
] 11.2 Libraries
]
] All libraries must have a shared version in the lib* package and a
] static version in the lib*-dev package. The shared version must be
] compiled with -fPIC, and the static version must not be. In other
] words, each *.c file will need to b
On Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 01:06:37PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 06:43:55PM +0200, Jesus Climent wrote:
> > I have been pushing mplayer developers (might even be the cause why they
> > do not care about by bug reports anymore) to have the complete code as
> > GPL.
> >
> >
Hello all.
I'm working on becoming a new maintainer, and Mako has already
volunteered to sponsor me.
I have been an upstream contributor to wine for a while and after
attending debconf, decided to do whatever I can to help debian.
So, I looked at the wnpp list and found limewire, which is a g
On Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 06:43:55PM +0200, Jesus Climent wrote:
> I have been pushing mplayer developers (might even be the cause why they
> do not care about by bug reports anymore) to have the complete code as
> GPL.
>
> So far, as announced in their mailing list, mplayer is completelly GPL,
> ex
> How do I proceed here? Put MPlayer in the "suggests" line? Or create an
> informational dialog that will show a warning about the dependency?
Depends: mplayer
Section: contrib/
In other words, do depend on mplayer (mplayer CVS has debian/ in it
anyway), and put kmencoder in contrib. Packages in
On Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 06:30:17PM +0200, Till Gerken wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think this question has been asked before, but the archive search
> didn't really reveal anything meaningful.
>
> I intend to package KMencoder, which is a front-end to MEncoder for KDE.
> MEncoder in turn is a part of MP
Hello,
I think this question has been asked before, but the archive search
didn't really reveal anything meaningful.
I intend to package KMencoder, which is a front-end to MEncoder for KDE.
MEncoder in turn is a part of MPlayer, which is not in Debian due to
licensing conflicts.
KMencoder depend
You don't say what these packages are or why they should go into Debian. It
is unlikely people will be interested in looking at your packages until you
have done this. Please see http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp about filing an
ITP bug against the 'wnpp' pseudo-package for each of your packages
c
Hello.
I found three interesting applications which are not avaiable as deb package.
The first two are temporary (first revision), but the third is better packaged
(also I have written a simple man page).
If someone wants to take a look and/or became my sponsor, go to
http://utenti.lycos.it/linux
22 matches
Mail list logo
