Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi mentors,
> is possible to have an Arch: field defined by a substvar?
>
> Our problem (with our = debian ocaml maintainers) is that ocaml native
> code compiler isn't available for all architectures supported by debian,
> and, even if we have a
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 08:39:09PM +0200, Ryszard Lach wrote:
> Can you remind me where should I upload a non-us package?
non-us.debian.org. By scp, upload to /org/non-us.debian.org/incoming/.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi mentors,
> is possible to have an Arch: field defined by a substvar?
>
> Our problem (with our = debian ocaml maintainers) is that ocaml native
> code compiler isn't available for all architectures supported by debian,
> and, even if we have
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 08:39:09PM +0200, Ryszard Lach wrote:
> Can you remind me where should I upload a non-us package?
non-us.debian.org. By scp, upload to /org/non-us.debian.org/incoming/.
--
Colin Watson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E
Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 08:21:09PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> >
> > Provided your packages conflict, you can make two files,
> > debian/server.conf.5 and debian/server-enhanced.conf.5. Make the latter
> > have the same .TH line at the top as does the forme
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 08:13:13PM +0200, Matus fantomas Uhlar wrote:
> -> Look at how the atlas2 package does this.
> I did it - it seems it has multiple modules for multiple instruction sets.
> However, that would require me to recompile those packages which sems like
> no good idea (it will be
Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 08:21:09PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> >
> > Provided your packages conflict, you can make two files,
> > debian/server.conf.5 and debian/server-enhanced.conf.5. Make the latter
> > have the same .TH line at the top as does the form
So, I'm working on a Java package (Jakarta's commons-httpclient) that
requires the JSSE [1] to compile, although it doesn't require it to
run. There are legal issues with the JSSE package that would prevent
it from being packaged for Debian, however [2].
One workaround I can think of for this cas
Hi!
Can you remind me where should I upload a non-us package?
TIA
Richard.
--
"First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they
fight you. Then you win." - Mohandas Gandhi.
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 08:13:13PM +0200, Matus fantomas Uhlar wrote:
> -> Look at how the atlas2 package does this.
> I did it - it seems it has multiple modules for multiple instruction sets.
> However, that would require me to recompile those packages which sems like
> no good idea (it will b
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 08:06:58PM +0200, Matus fantomas Uhlar wrote:
> -> Not if other packages declare *versioned* dependencies on it.
>
> hmmm should I now blame someone or is it unexpected situation that is not
> expected to happen and there is no solution now (except the one below)?
It's be
-> > I'd like to do it that way that my package would not cause any conflicts,
-> > and would not be automatically replacedm therefore I think it would be best
-> > to name these packages like "$package-$cpu"
->
-> Look at how the atlas2 package does this.
I did it - it seems it has multiple modu
-> > -> That would require versioned dependencies on virtual packages (versioned
-> > -> Provides:) to work, but they don't. You'll probably have to use
-> > -> something like a high epoch instead.
-> >
-> > Pardon? Does that mean there's no possibility to provide one package bye
-> > another one,
So, I'm working on a Java package (Jakarta's commons-httpclient) that
requires the JSSE [1] to compile, although it doesn't require it to
run. There are legal issues with the JSSE package that would prevent
it from being packaged for Debian, however [2].
One workaround I can think of for this ca
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 06:19:08PM +0200, Matus fantomas Uhlar wrote:
> I'd like to do it that way that my package would not cause any conflicts,
> and would not be automatically replacedm therefore I think it would be best
> to name these packages like "$package-$cpu"
Look at how the atlas2 pack
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 07:02:34PM +0200, Matus fantomas Uhlar wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> -> That would require versioned dependencies on virtual packages (versioned
> -> Provides:) to work, but they don't. You'll probably have to use
> -> something like a high epoch instead.
>
> Pardon? Does
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 06:19:08PM +0200, Matus fantomas Uhlar wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to compile some packages optimised for my processor. I have k6
> at home and pentiumII at work, and would like to speed up some programs
> running on those.
How about installing pentiumbuilder, configu
-> On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 06:19:08PM +0200, Matus fantomas Uhlar wrote:
-> > I tried to unpack libogg0 package, change its name to libogg0-k6, and add
-> > these to control file:
-> >
-> > Provides: libogg0
-> > Replaces: libogg0
-> > Conflicts: libogg0
-> >
-> > However, when trying to install
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 06:19:08PM +0200, Matus fantomas Uhlar wrote:
> Problem:
>
> I tried to unpack libogg0 package, change its name to libogg0-k6, and add
> these to control file:
>
> Provides: libogg0
> Replaces: libogg0
> Conflicts: libogg0
>
> However, when trying to install this, i got s
Hi mentors,
is possible to have an Arch: field defined by a substvar?
Our problem (with our = debian ocaml maintainers) is that ocaml native
code compiler isn't available for all architectures supported by debian,
and, even if we have a bytecode compiler available everywhere, we can
want to have
On Mon, 2002-09-09 at 13:19, Matus "fantomas" Uhlar wrote:
> Provides: libogg0
> Replaces: libogg0
> Conflicts: libogg0
>
> However, when trying to install this, i got some errors about other packages
> depending on libogg0, thus libogg0 was not removed, and my package was not
> installed.
dpkg
> I've tried the solution proposed by Joey (using the .TH field in the
> man source), but it didn't work... so I think the only way is to do
> it manually as many of you have suggested.
Oh hmm, I'd forgotten that the .TH line typically has the man page name
in all upper-case, which means there is
Hello,
I would like to compile some packages optimised for my processor. I have k6
at home and pentiumII at work, and would like to speed up some programs
running on those.
I'd like to do it that way that my package would not cause any conflicts,
and would not be automatically replacedm therefore
Hi!
Can you remind me where should I upload a non-us package?
TIA
Richard.
--
"First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they
fight you. Then you win." - Mohandas Gandhi.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTE
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 08:06:58PM +0200, Matus fantomas Uhlar wrote:
> -> Not if other packages declare *versioned* dependencies on it.
>
> hmmm should I now blame someone or is it unexpected situation that is not
> expected to happen and there is no solution now (except the one below)?
It's b
-> > I'd like to do it that way that my package would not cause any conflicts,
-> > and would not be automatically replacedm therefore I think it would be best
-> > to name these packages like "$package-$cpu"
->
-> Look at how the atlas2 package does this.
I did it - it seems it has multiple mod
-> > -> That would require versioned dependencies on virtual packages (versioned
-> > -> Provides:) to work, but they don't. You'll probably have to use
-> > -> something like a high epoch instead.
-> >
-> > Pardon? Does that mean there's no possibility to provide one package bye
-> > another one
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 06:19:08PM +0200, Matus fantomas Uhlar wrote:
> I'd like to do it that way that my package would not cause any conflicts,
> and would not be automatically replacedm therefore I think it would be best
> to name these packages like "$package-$cpu"
Look at how the atlas2 pac
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 07:02:34PM +0200, Matus fantomas Uhlar wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> -> That would require versioned dependencies on virtual packages (versioned
> -> Provides:) to work, but they don't. You'll probably have to use
> -> something like a high epoch instead.
>
> Pardon? Does
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 06:19:08PM +0200, Matus fantomas Uhlar wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to compile some packages optimised for my processor. I have k6
> at home and pentiumII at work, and would like to speed up some programs
> running on those.
How about installing pentiumbuilder, config
-> On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 06:19:08PM +0200, Matus fantomas Uhlar wrote:
-> > I tried to unpack libogg0 package, change its name to libogg0-k6, and add
-> > these to control file:
-> >
-> > Provides: libogg0
-> > Replaces: libogg0
-> > Conflicts: libogg0
-> >
-> > However, when trying to install
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 06:19:08PM +0200, Matus fantomas Uhlar wrote:
> Problem:
>
> I tried to unpack libogg0 package, change its name to libogg0-k6, and add
> these to control file:
>
> Provides: libogg0
> Replaces: libogg0
> Conflicts: libogg0
>
> However, when trying to install this, i got
Hi mentors,
is possible to have an Arch: field defined by a substvar?
Our problem (with our = debian ocaml maintainers) is that ocaml native
code compiler isn't available for all architectures supported by debian,
and, even if we have a bytecode compiler available everywhere, we can
want to hav
On Mon, 2002-09-09 at 13:19, Matus "fantomas" Uhlar wrote:
> Provides: libogg0
> Replaces: libogg0
> Conflicts: libogg0
>
> However, when trying to install this, i got some errors about other packages
> depending on libogg0, thus libogg0 was not removed, and my package was not
> installed.
dpkg
> I've tried the solution proposed by Joey (using the .TH field in the
> man source), but it didn't work... so I think the only way is to do
> it manually as many of you have suggested.
Oh hmm, I'd forgotten that the .TH line typically has the man page name
in all upper-case, which means there i
Hello,
I would like to compile some packages optimised for my processor. I have k6
at home and pentiumII at work, and would like to speed up some programs
running on those.
I'd like to do it that way that my package would not cause any conflicts,
and would not be automatically replacedm therefor
"Marco Presi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> sr> Hrm, the cleanest solution would be to send the manpages to the upstream
> sr> maintainer and have him edit the build scripts so that the correct
> sr> manpage gets installed.
> It is not possible, because the man pages were written by
> me. Prist
|| On Mon, 9 Sep 2002 00:16:26 +0200
|| Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
sr> Marco,
>> My problem is this: for the two packeges I want to have two
>> different man pages (in fact "server-enhanced" has more config
>> options that "server") but it would nice if the man
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 06:27:05PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
>
> > So dh_builddeb just says the command returned an error code, without
> > specifying which command (dpkg-deb?) or which error.
>
> Run dh_buildeb -v to get the command it is running, you should then be
> able to reproduce it manually
"Marco Presi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> sr> Hrm, the cleanest solution would be to send the manpages to the upstream
> sr> maintainer and have him edit the build scripts so that the correct
> sr> manpage gets installed.
> It is not possible, because the man pages were written by
> me. Pris
|| On Mon, 9 Sep 2002 00:16:26 +0200
|| Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
sr> Marco,
>> My problem is this: for the two packeges I want to have two
>> different man pages (in fact "server-enhanced" has more config
>> options that "server") but it would nice if the man
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 06:27:05PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
>
> > So dh_builddeb just says the command returned an error code, without
> > specifying which command (dpkg-deb?) or which error.
>
> Run dh_buildeb -v to get the command it is running, you should then be
> able to reproduce it manuall
Marco,
> My problem is this: for the two packeges I want to have two
> different man pages (in fact "server-enhanced" has more config
> options that "server") but it would nice if the man pages could have
> the same name ("server.conf.5")
Actually the server program itself should h
|| On Sun, 8 Sep 2002 20:21:09 -0400
|| Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
jh> Marco Presi wrote:
>> My problem is this: for the two packeges I want to have two
>> different man pages (in fact "server-enhanced" has more config
>> options that "server") but it would nice if
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 08:21:09PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Marco Presi wrote:
> > My problem is this: for the two packeges I want to have two
> > different man pages (in fact "server-enhanced" has more config
> > options that "server") but it would nice if the man pages could have
Marco,
> My problem is this: for the two packeges I want to have two
> different man pages (in fact "server-enhanced" has more config
> options that "server") but it would nice if the man pages could have
> the same name ("server.conf.5")
Actually the server program itself should
|| On Sun, 8 Sep 2002 20:21:09 -0400
|| Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
jh> Marco Presi wrote:
>> My problem is this: for the two packeges I want to have two
>> different man pages (in fact "server-enhanced" has more config
>> options that "server") but it would nice if
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 08:21:09PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Marco Presi wrote:
> > My problem is this: for the two packeges I want to have two
> > different man pages (in fact "server-enhanced" has more config
> > options that "server") but it would nice if the man pages could have
On Sat, 7 Sep 2002 00:04:16 -0300
Carlos Laviola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A package that I maintain -- mp3blaster -- doesn't include libsidplay1
> as a dependency, even though it links against it. I hadn't noticed that
> because I thought everything was working fine, as I hadn't trie
49 matches
Mail list logo
