On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 10:15:16AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 04:42:48AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> >
> > Mmm, but what if there is a bug found in ocaml's native code compiler,
> > that forces me to disable one of th
2003中�H光���b�I展�[��
2003 China International Photoelectric Industry Fair
�r �g： 2003年4月1日至4日 TIME：April 1st to 4th , 2003
地 �c： 深圳中�H高新技�g成果交易��展�[中心
ADD ： CHINA HI-TECH FAIR EXHIBITION CENTRE （SHENZHEN）
主�k�挝�:Sponsors
中子�W��Chinese Institute of Electronics (CIE)
�f�k�挝
At 22:35 +0200 9/11/02, Marco Kuhlmann wrote:
>Dear mentors,
>
>I do not quite seem to understand what I have to do in order to
>prevent a source package being ported to certain architectures.
>Do I have to write Architecture entries for the supported
>architectures for all the packages that my
* Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (2002-09-12 13:48:43 +0200):
> Could you tell us why you want prevent free software being
> ported to certain architectures?
Sorry, perhaps I should reformulate my question: How do I tell
porters not to try to build a certain package? (For example,
when the p
At 14:29 +0200 9/12/02, Marco Kuhlmann wrote:
>* Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (2002-09-12 13:48:43 +0200):
>
>> Could you tell us why you want prevent free software being
>> ported to certain architectures?
>
>Sorry, perhaps I should reformulate my question: How do I tell
>porters not to try
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Geert Stappers wrote:
> At 14:29 +0200 9/12/02, Marco Kuhlmann wrote:
> >* Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (2002-09-12 13:48:43 +0200):
> >
> >> Could you tell us why you want prevent free software being
> >> ported to certain architectures?
> >
> >Sorry, perhaps I should
"J. Scott Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I agree that one shouldn't restrict the sources. But I am curious how one
> tests on various platforms. All of my machines are x86 and PowerPC (and
> it's dead at the moment). Then of course I could use the compile farm at
> SourceForge.
If you
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 08:01:40AM -0600, J. Scott Edwards wrote:
> I agree that one shouldn't restrict the sources.
*shrug* The build daemons override it anyway. I don't see a point in
inflating it into an issue of political correctness like Geert seems to
want to do; if it doesn't work for some
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 01:29:15PM +0100, Marco Kuhlmann wrote:
> * Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (2002-09-12 13:48:43 +0200):
>
> > Could you tell us why you want prevent free software being
> > ported to certain architectures?
>
Some software cannot be easily ported to any architectures.
Marco Kuhlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (2002-09-12 13:48:43 +0200):
>
> > Could you tell us why you want prevent free software being
> > ported to certain architectures?
>
> Sorry, perhaps I should reformulate my question: How do I tell
> porters not to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I'm trying to debianize pgpenvelope (see control file at end of this mail
for description). I started from package created by dh-make-perl,
sucessfully removed all errors and warnings except of the:
| semik:~/proj/packaging$lintian pgpenvelope_2.1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 12 September 2002 22:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> sucessfully removed all errors and warnings except of the:
> | semik:~/proj/packaging$lintian pgpenvelope_2.10.2-3_all.deb
> | W: pgpenvelope: prerm-does-not-remove-usr-doc-link
> | W: pgp
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 10:15:16AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 04:42:48AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> >
> > Mmm, but what if there is a bug found in ocaml's native code compiler,
> > that forces me to disable one of t
2003ÖÐøøëH¹âë®bIÕ¹Ó[þ
2003 China International Photoelectric Industry Fair
r ég£º 2003Äê4ÔÂ1ÈÕÖÁ4ÈÕ TIME£ºApril 1st to 4th , 2003
µØ üc£º ÉîÛÚÖÐøøëH¸ßм¼Ðg³É¹û½»Ò×þÕ¹Ó[ÖÐÐÄ
ADD £º CHINA HI-TECH FAIR EXHIBITION CENTRE £¨SHENZHEN£©
Ö÷ÞkÎλ:Sponsors
ÖÐøë×ÓWþChinese Inst
At 22:35 +0200 9/11/02, Marco Kuhlmann wrote:
>Dear mentors,
>
>I do not quite seem to understand what I have to do in order to
>prevent a source package being ported to certain architectures.
>Do I have to write Architecture entries for the supported
>architectures for all the packages that m
* Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (2002-09-12 13:48:43 +0200):
> Could you tell us why you want prevent free software being
> ported to certain architectures?
Sorry, perhaps I should reformulate my question: How do I tell
porters not to try to build a certain package? (For example,
when the
At 14:29 +0200 9/12/02, Marco Kuhlmann wrote:
>* Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (2002-09-12 13:48:43 +0200):
>
>> Could you tell us why you want prevent free software being
>> ported to certain architectures?
>
>Sorry, perhaps I should reformulate my question: How do I tell
>porters not to try
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Geert Stappers wrote:
> At 14:29 +0200 9/12/02, Marco Kuhlmann wrote:
> >* Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (2002-09-12 13:48:43 +0200):
> >
> >> Could you tell us why you want prevent free software being
> >> ported to certain architectures?
> >
> >Sorry, perhaps I should
"J. Scott Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I agree that one shouldn't restrict the sources. But I am curious how one
> tests on various platforms. All of my machines are x86 and PowerPC (and
> it's dead at the moment). Then of course I could use the compile farm at
> SourceForge.
If yo
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 08:01:40AM -0600, J. Scott Edwards wrote:
> I agree that one shouldn't restrict the sources.
*shrug* The build daemons override it anyway. I don't see a point in
inflating it into an issue of political correctness like Geert seems to
want to do; if it doesn't work for some
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 01:29:15PM +0100, Marco Kuhlmann wrote:
> * Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (2002-09-12 13:48:43 +0200):
>
> > Could you tell us why you want prevent free software being
> > ported to certain architectures?
>
Some software cannot be easily ported to any architectures.
Marco Kuhlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (2002-09-12 13:48:43 +0200):
>
> > Could you tell us why you want prevent free software being
> > ported to certain architectures?
>
> Sorry, perhaps I should reformulate my question: How do I tell
> porters not t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I'm trying to debianize pgpenvelope (see control file at end of this mail
for description). I started from package created by dh-make-perl,
sucessfully removed all errors and warnings except of the:
| semik:~/proj/packaging$lintian pgpenvelope_2.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 12 September 2002 22:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> sucessfully removed all errors and warnings except of the:
> | semik:~/proj/packaging$lintian pgpenvelope_2.10.2-3_all.deb
> | W: pgpenvelope: prerm-does-not-remove-usr-doc-link
> | W: pg
24 matches
Mail list logo
