On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:11:09AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:38:02AM +0200, Remi VANICAT wrote:
> > Another possibility is to go to one or another debian.org developer
> > machine an to make the build there. You may even be able to use screen
> > to not been forced t
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:38:02AM +0200, Remi VANICAT wrote:
> Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hello, ...
> >
>
> [...]
>
>
> > After a bit more looking, i noticed that the arch: all packages were not
> > autobuilt, which seems normal to me with a bit more thinking about it,
> >
This one time, at band camp, Stefan Schimanski said:
> Hi,
>
> On Sunday 22 September 2002 19:01, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > Hello all, I recently packaged up KCDLabel, a very nice GUI CD Label
> > creator. IT allows for both image and text manipulation, and I find
> > it nice for making CD's for fr
Marco> I found out a little more about my current troubles with the
Marco> new versions of my packages mozart, mozart-contrib, and
Marco> mozart-doc-html. The phenomenon is this:
Jérôme> The answer is there:
Jérôme>
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2001/debian-devel-200107/msg01666.html
M
This one time, at band camp, Stefan Schimanski said:
> Hi,
>
> On Sunday 22 September 2002 19:01, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > Hello all, I recently packaged up KCDLabel, a very nice GUI CD Label
> > creator. IT allows for both image and text manipulation, and I find
> > it nice for making CD's for f
Marco> I found out a little more about my current troubles with the
Marco> new versions of my packages mozart, mozart-contrib, and
Marco> mozart-doc-html. The phenomenon is this:
Jérôme> The answer is there:
Jérôme> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2001/debian-devel-200107/msg01666.html
M
On Sun, 22 Sep 2002, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Sep 2002, Sam Powers wrote:
>
> > I've got a package, xmms-liveice, which is very, very unstable. The
> > upstream author has moved on to other projects, and doesn't seem
> > particularly interested in making the code work better.
>
> Beat h
On Sun, 22 Sep 2002, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Sep 2002, Sam Powers wrote:
>
> > I've got a package, xmms-liveice, which is very, very unstable. The
> > upstream author has moved on to other projects, and doesn't seem
> > particularly interested in making the code work better.
>
> Beat
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:49:50PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit:
>
> > Sometimes this happens because it makes sense to share the library within
> > the (to conserve resources), but either:
> >
> > - It does not make sense for other program
Devin Carraway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit:
> Ignoring the irksome ld.so issues for a moment, upstram for this package
> is doing exactly the right thing by putting common functionality out in
> shared libs, even if the only executables sharing them are the ones in
> the package itself.
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit:
> Sometimes this happens because it makes sense to share the library within
> the (to conserve resources), but either:
>
> - It does not make sense for other programs to use the library (very
> specific)
But we all know that it is very oft
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 08:54:19PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Devin Carraway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit:
>
> > I'm working on a package containing several executables, whose common
> > functionality lives in a few shared libraries. They're linked in the
> > usual way at compile t
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 05:05:25PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Holger Kubiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit:
> > But I have another problem: When I build the package with debuild there
> > is no problem, when I build with pdebuild, all scripts (one bash, one
> > perl) in /usr/bin are no
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:49:50PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit:
>
> > Sometimes this happens because it makes sense to share the library within
> > the (to conserve resources), but either:
> >
> > - It does not make sense for other progra
Devin Carraway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit:
> Ignoring the irksome ld.so issues for a moment, upstram for this package
> is doing exactly the right thing by putting common functionality out in
> shared libs, even if the only executables sharing them are the ones in
> the package itself
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit:
> Sometimes this happens because it makes sense to share the library within
> the (to conserve resources), but either:
>
> - It does not make sense for other programs to use the library (very
> specific)
But we all know that it is very of
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:25:59AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 12:06:29PM +0200, Dagfinn Ilmari Manns?ker wrote:
> > Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:38:02AM +0200, Remi VANICAT wrote:
> > >> Of course this mean that you need to have
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 08:54:19PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Devin Carraway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit:
>
> > I'm working on a package containing several executables, whose common
> > functionality lives in a few shared libraries. They're linked in the
> > usual way at compile
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 05:05:25PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Holger Kubiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit:
> > But I have another problem: When I build the package with debuild there
> > is no problem, when I build with pdebuild, all scripts (one bash, one
> > perl) in /usr/bin are n
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 12:06:29PM +0200, Dagfinn Ilmari Manns?ker wrote:
> Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:38:02AM +0200, Remi VANICAT wrote:
> >> Of course this mean that you need to have your gnupg secret key there,
> >> and this may be unwanted.
> >
> > N
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:38:02AM +0200, Remi VANICAT wrote:
>> Of course this mean that you need to have your gnupg secret key there,
>> and this may be unwanted.
>
> No, build it unsigned on the remote machine, then copy the .dsc and
> .changes back fo
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:38:02AM +0200, Remi VANICAT wrote:
> Another possibility is to go to one or another debian.org developer
> machine an to make the build there. You may even be able to use screen
> to not been forced to be connected for the whole build.
You should be able to build offline
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:38:02AM +0200, Remi VANICAT wrote:
> Of course this mean that you need to have your gnupg secret key there,
> and this may be unwanted.
No, build it unsigned on the remote machine, then copy the .dsc and
.changes back for signing on a local trusted machine.
--
Colin Wa
> > Is this list the proper place to look, or is some other official list more
> > appropriate and I should put on my hat and coat, pick up my things and
> > go stand in line?
>
> The place to find sponsors is basically here - you post with a subject of
> something like "Looking for a sponsor for
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:25:59AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 12:06:29PM +0200, Dagfinn Ilmari Manns?ker wrote:
> > Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:38:02AM +0200, Remi VANICAT wrote:
> > >> Of course this mean that you need to hav
Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello, ...
>
[...]
> After a bit more looking, i noticed that the arch: all packages were not
> autobuilt, which seems normal to me with a bit more thinking about it,
> but the binary-all package is rather huge, and i have difficulties
> uploading it ri
Après Http://Xsat.rtfm.be, nous revoila avec un nouveau Site et de nouvelles
aventures ...
Le Site est encore en cours de réalisation, mais le Forum est déja ouvert...
Merci de passer nous voir à l'occasion
Déjà disponible Les Firmwares de Toute la gamme des Recepteurs Worldsat.
After Http://Xsa
Hello, ...
Since i am right now settled with expensive and limited bandwith, i
decided some time ago to do a source only upload of my packages (well i
uploaded the first one (-1) fully, but for the next ones, i tested them
on my system, and then built them with -S and uploaded only the
.diff.gz, .
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 12:06:29PM +0200, Dagfinn Ilmari Manns?ker wrote:
> Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:38:02AM +0200, Remi VANICAT wrote:
> >> Of course this mean that you need to have your gnupg secret key there,
> >> and this may be unwanted.
> >
> >
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:38:02AM +0200, Remi VANICAT wrote:
>> Of course this mean that you need to have your gnupg secret key there,
>> and this may be unwanted.
>
> No, build it unsigned on the remote machine, then copy the .dsc and
> .changes back f
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:38:02AM +0200, Remi VANICAT wrote:
> Another possibility is to go to one or another debian.org developer
> machine an to make the build there. You may even be able to use screen
> to not been forced to be connected for the whole build.
You should be able to build offlin
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:38:02AM +0200, Remi VANICAT wrote:
> Of course this mean that you need to have your gnupg secret key there,
> and this may be unwanted.
No, build it unsigned on the remote machine, then copy the .dsc and
.changes back for signing on a local trusted machine.
--
Colin W
> > Is this list the proper place to look, or is some other official list more
> > appropriate and I should put on my hat and coat, pick up my things and
> > go stand in line?
>
> The place to find sponsors is basically here - you post with a subject of
> something like "Looking for a sponsor for
Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello, ...
>
[...]
> After a bit more looking, i noticed that the arch: all packages were not
> autobuilt, which seems normal to me with a bit more thinking about it,
> but the binary-all package is rather huge, and i have difficulties
> uploading it r
Après Http://Xsat.rtfm.be, nous revoila avec un nouveau Site et de nouvelles aventures
...
Le Site est encore en cours de réalisation, mais le Forum est déja ouvert...
Merci de passer nous voir à l'occasion
Déjà disponible Les Firmwares de Toute la gamme des Recepteurs Worldsat.
After Http://Xs
Sorry for the massive subscribe cross-posting.
My mailserver is bouncing some mails and SmartList keeps on
desubscribing me from all my loved debian lists. And trying to subscribe
at this hour in the morning might not be such good idea.
J
--
Jesus Climent | Unix System Admin | Helsinki, Finland
--
Jesus Climent | Unix System Admin | Helsinki, Finland.
web: www.hispalinux.es/~data/ | pumuki.hispalinux.es
--
Please, encrypt mail sent to me: GnuPG ID: 86946D69
FP: BB64 2339 1CAA 7064 E429 7E18 66FC 1D7F 8694 6D69
---
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 01:40:12PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> If you can avoid those shared libraries it would be best. Libraries
> should be either shared in /usr/lib or not shared at all. The halfway
> between place is not a mature methodology at this time and contains
> many problems.
Ignorin
Hello, ...
Since i am right now settled with expensive and limited bandwith, i
decided some time ago to do a source only upload of my packages (well i
uploaded the first one (-1) fully, but for the next ones, i tested them
on my system, and then built them with -S and uploaded only the
.diff.gz,
39 matches
Mail list logo
