Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have fewer qualms about a package that only wipes out a config file
> when explicitly reconfigured; most of my ire is reserved for packages,
> like apt-listchanges, that drop local modifications to such files on
> upgrade. Especially when the files are (as
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 09:37:47PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 10:24:03PM -0500, Levi Bard wrote:
> > Hello,
> > Is there some way I can find out how many/which Debian Developers
> > reside in a particular area, in the interests of finding an advocate?
>
> ldapsearc
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 01:16:01AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > without a d.o login?
>
> Yes. Try it.
Geographical information freely available?
(I can't be online reading my mail in this period)
--
Christian Surchi, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ICQ
www.debian.org - www.soft
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 09:37:47PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 10:24:03PM -0500, Levi Bard wrote:
> > Hello,
> > Is there some way I can find out how many/which Debian Developers reside in a
>particular area, in the interests of finding an advocate?
>
> ldapsearch -
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 06:09:54PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> I have fewer qualms about a package that only wipes out a config file when
> explicitly reconfigured; most of my ire is reserved for packages, like
> apt-listchanges, that drop local modifications to such files on upgrade.
> Especially w
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 01:16:01AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > without a d.o login?
>
> Yes. Try it.
Geographical information freely available?
(I can't be online reading my mail in this period)
--
Christian Surchi, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ICQ
www.debian.org - www.soft
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 06:09:54PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> I have fewer qualms about a package that only wipes out a config file when
> explicitly reconfigured; most of my ire is reserved for packages, like
> apt-listchanges, that drop local modifications to such files on upgrade.
> Especially w
Brian Nelson wrote:
> I have a prospective package that checks for the environment variable
> DPKG_RECONFIGURE=1 in the postinst, and if it decides that it's being
> reconfigured, it will overwrite its configuration file (not a conffile)
> based on the debconf answers. The theory is that if a user
Brian Nelson wrote:
> I have a prospective package that checks for the environment variable
> DPKG_RECONFIGURE=1 in the postinst, and if it decides that it's being
> reconfigured, it will overwrite its configuration file (not a conffile)
> based on the debconf answers. The theory is that if a user
OoO Pendant le temps de midi du jeudi 31 octobre 2002, vers 12:27,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Craig Small) disait:
> I would of thought having new packages in gkrellm2 would make more
> sense, considering gkrellm2 is in at least testing.
I have uploaded packages for GKrellM2 :
http://www.crans.org/~ber
OoO Pendant le temps de midi du jeudi 31 octobre 2002, vers 12:27,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Craig Small) disait:
> I would of thought having new packages in gkrellm2 would make more
> sense, considering gkrellm2 is in at least testing.
I have uploaded packages for GKrellM2 :
http://www.crans.org/~ber
11 matches
Mail list logo
