> gcj is supposed to come with a working jni implementation and comes with
> gij (GNU Interpreter for Java) for interpreting bytecode. What exactly
> doesn't work with gcj? Could you please file a bug report?
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html
> That way we at least know about the issue.
>
> Also Kaff
Hi,
On Sat, 2002-11-16 at 01:47, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> > Mmm, another idea, java is supposed to be arch-independant bytecode, so
> > you should maybe build your package arch: all instead of arch: any.
>
> Oh, I forgot to mention that... nbio is a JNI-based package (it
> provides non-blocking
> gcj is supposed to come with a working jni implementation and comes with
> gij (GNU Interpreter for Java) for interpreting bytecode. What exactly
> doesn't work with gcj? Could you please file a bug report?
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html
> That way we at least know about the issue.
>
> Also Kaff
Hi,
On Sat, 2002-11-16 at 01:47, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> > Mmm, another idea, java is supposed to be arch-independant bytecode, so
> > you should maybe build your package arch: all instead of arch: any.
>
> Oh, I forgot to mention that... nbio is a JNI-based package (it
> provides non-blocking
Christian Marillat dijo:
> Of course not. You need to hack the code for that. Upstream author is
> Bruno Pires Marinho ?
No, his name is Richard Kinder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
--
.''`. Nothing screams poor workmanship more than wrinkles in the duct tape
: :' :
`. `' Proudly running Debia
> Erm, i think it is even worse, i think that the users would need to
> install the j2sdk1.3 package or else it will be unusable. This also
> means that your package will never enter testing, i think, or maybe
> there is some kind of override for contrib/non-free packages. Also, the
> j2sdk1.3 is a
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 05:00:47PM -0600, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> > Last i knew, j2sdk1.3 is not part of debian, be it in main, contrib or
> > non-free, because it is not possible for us to distribute it because of
> > the licencing issues.
> >
> > Because of that, this particular dependency w
Christian Marillat dijo:
> Of course not. You need to hack the code for that. Upstream author is
> Bruno Pires Marinho ?
No, his name is Richard Kinder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
--
.''`. Nothing screams poor workmanship more than wrinkles in the duct tape
: :' :
`. `' Proudly running Debia
Amaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> and I don't even know if it will work agains new Gnome 2.0 panel
> (haven't had time to test).
Of course not. You need to hack the code for that. Upstream author is
Bruno Pires Marinho ?
Christian
Dear friends at the release team,
I am planning to upload seti-applet to stable, in order to fix these two
bugs:
seti-applet (0.2.2-2) stable; urgency=high
* Added CFLAGS to find libgtop header files (Closes: #140659)
Added CONFIG_FLAGS for completeness.
*
Hello, I'm experiencing some oddities with qmail which I got from src
unstable (there actually all the same in all branches) and wanted to
know how, if possible, I could get back to a virgin debian qmail source.
The qmail source comes patched with qmail-queue, badmailfrom and some
other patches,
> Last i knew, j2sdk1.3 is not part of debian, be it in main, contrib or
> non-free, because it is not possible for us to distribute it because of
> the licencing issues.
>
> Because of that, this particular dependency will never be really
> satisfied, the auto builders will not be able to build
> Erm, i think it is even worse, i think that the users would need to
> install the j2sdk1.3 package or else it will be unusable. This also
> means that your package will never enter testing, i think, or maybe
> there is some kind of override for contrib/non-free packages. Also, the
> j2sdk1.3 is a
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 03:49:53PM -0600, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> [I'm cross-posting to debian-java and debian-mentors, because I'm not
> sure whether this is a Java question or a packaging question. Please
> CC me on replies, if possible.]
>
> Can anyone suggest why libnbio2-java's build depe
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 05:00:47PM -0600, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> > Last i knew, j2sdk1.3 is not part of debian, be it in main, contrib or
> > non-free, because it is not possible for us to distribute it because of
> > the licencing issues.
> >
> > Because of that, this particular dependency w
[I'm cross-posting to debian-java and debian-mentors, because I'm not
sure whether this is a Java question or a packaging question. Please
CC me on replies, if possible.]
Can anyone suggest why libnbio2-java's build dependency on j2sdk1.3
cannot be satisfied on all 13 platforms?
http://qa.deb
Amaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> and I don't even know if it will work agains new Gnome 2.0 panel
> (haven't had time to test).
Of course not. You need to hack the code for that. Upstream author is
Bruno Pires Marinho ?
Christian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Dear friends at the release team,
I am planning to upload seti-applet to stable, in order to fix these two
bugs:
seti-applet (0.2.2-2) stable; urgency=high
* Added CFLAGS to find libgtop header files (Closes: #140659)
Added CONFIG_FLAGS for completeness.
*
Hello, I'm experiencing some oddities with qmail which I got from src
unstable (there actually all the same in all branches) and wanted to
know how, if possible, I could get back to a virgin debian qmail source.
The qmail source comes patched with qmail-queue, badmailfrom and some
other patches,
> Last i knew, j2sdk1.3 is not part of debian, be it in main, contrib or
> non-free, because it is not possible for us to distribute it because of
> the licencing issues.
>
> Because of that, this particular dependency will never be really
> satisfied, the auto builders will not be able to build
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 03:49:53PM -0600, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> [I'm cross-posting to debian-java and debian-mentors, because I'm not
> sure whether this is a Java question or a packaging question. Please
> CC me on replies, if possible.]
>
> Can anyone suggest why libnbio2-java's build depe
[I'm cross-posting to debian-java and debian-mentors, because I'm not
sure whether this is a Java question or a packaging question. Please
CC me on replies, if possible.]
Can anyone suggest why libnbio2-java's build dependency on j2sdk1.3
cannot be satisfied on all 13 platforms?
http://qa.deb
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 10:06:51AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I imagine python stores everything in /usr/lib, again as a practical
> concession to the fact that upstream installation directories don't make
> it easy to use separate paths for arch-independent and arch-dependent
> objects.
When
--
Pankaj Jangid
Education Technology Unit, NCST
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 10:06:51AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I imagine python stores everything in /usr/lib, again as a practical
> concession to the fact that upstream installation directories don't make
> it easy to use separate paths for arch-independent and arch-dependent
> objects.
When
I'm adopting Qtella and I'm in need of a sponsor. It's a simple package
with a tiny diff, available here:
http://bignachos.com/~nelson/debian/
Thanks,
Brian
--
People said I was dumb, but I proved them!
pgpOacT9Csi6o.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
Pankaj Jangid
Education Technology Unit, NCST
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
27 matches
Mail list logo
