Lamentamos molestarles de
nuevo pero nuestro servidor de correo nos ha informado de que por problemas
técnicos (ajenos a FotoDigital) no ha estado operativo desde hace tres días por
lo que no hemos podido recibir las ALTAS (ni tampoco las peticiones de baja).
Solo espero que nos disculpen ya
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 10:53:03PM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Nov 2002 01:24, andrej hocevar wrote:
> > if I understood it correctly, this is the place to get started,
> > right? A short while ago, I wrote a ppp-monitoring program in Perl,
> > which I consider to be of good value. As
Once again, I rear my head from the deep, and bring news that I have a version of
pppoatm for ver. 2.4.2b1 of pppd, which now almost supports SVCs and limited server
capabilities. I was under the impression that I had sent a patch, but the mail seems
to still be hanging around in my Drafts folde
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 07:57:15PM +0800, Matthew Bell wrote:
> Once again, I rear my head from the deep, and bring news that I have a version of
>pppoatm for ver. 2.4.2b1 of pppd, which now almost supports SVCs and limited server
>capabilities. I was under the impression that I had sent a patch,
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002 23:06, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> you never want a file owned by nobody. services that do not need any
> elevated privedges should run as nobody, so if they are compromised,
> then can do nothing. if you download a file as nobody, then a
> compromised nobudy-running daemon ca
Lamentamos molestarles de
nuevo pero nuestro servidor de correo nos ha informado de que por problemas
técnicos (ajenos a FotoDigital) no ha estado operativo desde hace tres días por
lo que no hemos podido recibir las ALTAS (ni tampoco las peticiones de baja).
Solo espero que nos disculpen ya
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 10:53:03PM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Nov 2002 01:24, andrej hocevar wrote:
> > if I understood it correctly, this is the place to get started,
> > right? A short while ago, I wrote a ppp-monitoring program in Perl,
> > which I consider to be of good value. As
Once again, I rear my head from the deep, and bring news that I have a version
of pppoatm for ver. 2.4.2b1 of pppd, which now almost supports SVCs and limited
server capabilities. I was under the impression that I had sent a patch, but
the mail seems to still be hanging around in my Drafts folde
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 07:57:15PM +0800, Matthew Bell wrote:
> Once again, I rear my head from the deep, and bring news that I have a
> version of pppoatm for ver. 2.4.2b1 of pppd, which now almost supports SVCs
> and limited server capabilities. I was under the impression that I had sent a
> p
9 matches
Mail list logo
