Jon Ward wrote:
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 08:47:35PM +0100, J?r?me Marant wrote:
This is just a reminder that GNAT 3.15p has been released.
I think that it is far more stable that the version from
GCC so it would be nice to make it available to Ada coders.
I recall that some people were
Ganhe uma boa grana simplesmente por estar online cadastre-se agora mesmo é grátis e
sem nenhum investimento http://www.ganhosdanet.hpg.ig.com.br/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi there!
I am in the position to have to maintain a library package from a
source where the upstream maintainer isn't familar with libtool and
SONAME. Unfortunately me neither. I have read through the libtool-doc
info pages about it and read the Library Packaging Guide, but still have
Hello,
Am looking for a sponsor for my package `libnet-easytcp-perl'
Debian related files can be found here:
http://madhu.homelinux.org/debian/libnet-easytcp-perl/
Package: libnet-easytcp-perl
Version: 0.17-1
Section: interpreters
Priority: optional
Architecture: all
Depends: perl (=
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frédéric,
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 11:35:26PM +1100, Frederic Schutz wrote:
1) I'd like to add a binary file to the upstream source (an image, so that
all images are available locally and no Internet connection is needed).
Obviously, the diff file
If you use g++ 3.2, all c++ libraries you link with should also be compiled
by gcc 3.2
Hello all,
I am trying to build a new version of one of my packages, as upstream
has ported it to gcc/g++-3.2 and KDE3. It would be nice to have the
kinks ironed out before the transition actually
Jon Ward wrote:
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 08:47:35PM +0100, J?r?me Marant wrote:
This is just a reminder that GNAT 3.15p has been released.
I think that it is far more stable that the version from
GCC so it would be nice to make it available to Ada coders.
I recall that some people were
Ganhe uma boa grana simplesmente por estar online cadastre-se agora mesmo é
grátis e sem nenhum investimento http://www.ganhosdanet.hpg.ig.com.br/
Hi there!
I am in the position to have to maintain a library package from a
source where the upstream maintainer isn't familar with libtool and
SONAME. Unfortunately me neither. I have read through the libtool-doc
info pages about it and read the Library Packaging Guide, but still have
Hello,
Am looking for a sponsor for my package `libnet-easytcp-perl'
Debian related files can be found here:
http://madhu.homelinux.org/debian/libnet-easytcp-perl/
Package: libnet-easytcp-perl
Version: 0.17-1
Section: interpreters
Priority: optional
Architecture: all
Depends: perl (=
[please cc: me if possible]
Hi everyone,
I'm currently packaging the w3c-markup-validator
(http://validator.w3.org:8001) and I have a few questions -- nothing that
stopped me while doing the package, but I'd just like to make sure I used
the best practice...
1) I'd like to add a binary file to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frédéric,
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 11:35:26PM +1100, Frederic Schutz wrote:
1) I'd like to add a binary file to the upstream source (an image, so that
all images are available locally and no Internet connection is needed).
Obviously, the diff file
If you use g++ 3.2, all c++ libraries you link with should also be compiled
by gcc 3.2
Hello all,
I am trying to build a new version of one of my packages, as upstream
has ported it to gcc/g++-3.2 and KDE3. It would be nice to have the
kinks ironed out before the transition actually
On 24 Nov 2002, Rob Bradford wrote:
I think it would be nice to achieve some kind of convention on the
format of messages requesting sponsors for packages.
Not a bad idea, on the whole. Feel like writing this up in a webpage
somewhere, sort of a Requesting Sponsorship HOWTO. That way, anyone
14 matches
Mail list logo
