On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 09:25:50PM +0100, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> This means that either :
> a foobillard goes to non-free, which would be a pity.
> b The fonts are removed from the package, which gets foobillard to
> contrib, but with dependencies on ttf-larabie-straight and
> ttf-la
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 09:25:50PM +0100, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> This means that either :
> a foobillard goes to non-free, which would be a pity.
> b The fonts are removed from the package, which gets foobillard to
> contrib, but with dependencies on ttf-larabie-straight and
> ttf-la
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 08 Jan 2003 20:25, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to package foobillard (http://foobillard.sunsite.dk/) for
> debian. I have the following problems :
[snip]
> Should I file an ITP bug?
Yes.
Paul Cupis
- --
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 08 Jan 2003 20:25, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to package foobillard (http://foobillard.sunsite.dk/) for
> debian. I have the following problems :
[snip]
> Should I file an ITP bug?
Yes.
Paul Cupis
- --
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I'm trying to package foobillard (http://foobillard.sunsite.dk/) for
debian. I have the following problems :
- I am not a DD, so I will need a sponsor (or the package will have to
remain unofficial)
- foobillard is GPL, but is distributed with 3 non-free fonts (larabie).
This means that e
Hi,
I'm trying to package foobillard (http://foobillard.sunsite.dk/) for
debian. I have the following problems :
- I am not a DD, so I will need a sponsor (or the package will have to
remain unofficial)
- foobillard is GPL, but is distributed with 3 non-free fonts (larabie).
This means that e
Le Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 01:37:01PM +0100, Karolina Lindqvist écrivait:
> Only that I don't know what to tell apt-get to reinstall such files. And
> then,
> if another file should not be reinstalled, only the essential ones, how to
> deal with that?
>
> There does not appear to be any option to
Le Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 01:37:01PM +0100, Karolina Lindqvist écrivait:
> Only that I don't know what to tell apt-get to reinstall such files. And then,
> if another file should not be reinstalled, only the essential ones, how to
> deal with that?
>
> There does not appear to be any option to apt
I have a problem with files in /etc
As I understand, they are marked as "conffiles". The problem is if such a file
is missing, it won't be reinstalled. How to tell the package system that this
file should be reinstalled if it is deleted?
i.e. The file is essential, and can't be missing.
This has
I have a problem with files in /etc
As I understand, they are marked as "conffiles". The problem is if such a file
is missing, it won't be reinstalled. How to tell the package system that this
file should be reinstalled if it is deleted?
i.e. The file is essential, and can't be missing.
This has
Hi Tommaso!
You wrote:
> Should I wait for my application to be approved or look for a sponsor?
No, just go ahead and find a sponsor.
> Should I report an ITP even if I'm not a Debian Developer?
Yes, definately.
--
Kind regards,
+
Hi Tommaso!
You wrote:
> Should I wait for my application to be approved or look for a sponsor?
No, just go ahead and find a sponsor.
> Should I report an ITP even if I'm not a Debian Developer?
Yes, definately.
--
Kind regards,
+
12 matches
Mail list logo