On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
As far as I can tell, no modules depend on it - Maybe I am searching for
this the wrong way, but...
There's an apt-cache command which shows reverse depends... Aah, there it
is, showpkg. Run that over any package, and it'll show you Reverse Depends
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 02:41:00AM -0500, sean finney wrote:
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 10:35:43PM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote:
so... is there anything i can do other than putting some more
documentation in /usr/share/doc?
Err, README.Debian?
that is what i was implying there, but was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
I'm looking for a sponsor for the following package.
The addition of libchipcard to Debian would substantially increase the number of
users benefitting from gnucash's hbci (home banking) extensions (cf. packages
gnucash-hbci, libopenhbci, and
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 01:21:32AM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote:
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 02:41:00AM -0500, sean finney wrote:
that is what i was implying there, but was wondering if there was
something *other* than that :) but with the above suggestion, i think
it'll be moot, so thanks again.
Hello,
I ITP'ed FXRuby (libfox-ruby) some time ago. But in the meantime I've
been cought up in another project (typical ;) and also found unofficial
libfox-ruby packages[0] (for the unstable ruby interpreter). So I have
kind of lost interest in packaging it and want to RFP it instead as I
still
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 01:22:30PM +0100, Jonas Fonseca wrote:
Should I just file an RFP bug somehow or what should I do ?
Don't file a new one, retitle the old one to RFP.
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Jonas!
You wrote:
Should I just file an RFP bug somehow or what should I do ?
Just retitle the existing bug to an RFP.
--
Kind regards,
++
| Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7 |
Hi all
I'm trying to package a mozilla plugin (enigmail), but i have a
problem with build dependences because I need a precompiled mozilla tree.
I have several options.
Option a)
I omit the tar.gz sources and I use a xpi compiled by my own
The deb installs this xpi like the mozilla-locale
Celso,
Option c)
Create a mozilla-dev? package and use this one like build dependence
Guess what? There is already a mozilla-dev package. :-)
Simon
--
GPG Fingerprint: 040E B5F7 84F1 4FBC CEAD ADC6 18A0 CC8D 5706 A4B4
msg08482/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 10:15:31PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
I'm using dh_perl to calculate the package dependencies for a perl
script in the cupsys-driver-gimpprint package. I thought this was
working, but it's not getting the dependencies right.
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 12:57:31PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
dh_perl doesn't (currently) attempt to calculate general module
dependencies, only core dependencies.
OK, thanks.
I guess that, due to the nature of the perl parser, adding this
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 05:00:19PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
The module package may not even be installed, the module may be used
conditionally, a versioned dependency may be needed, multiple packages
may provide the same module (and a dependency on a virtual package or an
ored dependency
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 01:39:43PM -0500, sean finney wrote:
i'm working on a package that has a directory in /etc/sugarplum
and in this directory two conffiles and one other (empty) directory.
when i purge the package, i get:
balthasar[/home/seanius/sugarplum]13:17:02# dpkg --purge
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 10:35:43PM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote:
i'm throwing together a cgi script package that requires certain
lines be added to the apache configuration file on the webserver
in order to work, so there's no way it can work out of the box as
far as i can figure, at least
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
As far as I can tell, no modules depend on it - Maybe I am searching for
this the wrong way, but...
There's an apt-cache command which shows reverse depends... Aah, there it
is, showpkg. Run that over any package, and it'll show you Reverse Depends
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Ian.
Ian Wilkinson wrote:
I am currently the developer of a cgi application (BlueLava, if anyone's
interested :-)). I've read as much as I can find about making .debs but
I can find nothing about producing a none-architecture specific .deb.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
I'm looking for a sponsor for the following package.
The addition of libchipcard to Debian would substantially increase the number of
users benefitting from gnucash's hbci (home banking) extensions (cf. packages
gnucash-hbci, libopenhbci, and
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 01:21:32AM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote:
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 02:41:00AM -0500, sean finney wrote:
that is what i was implying there, but was wondering if there was
something *other* than that :) but with the above suggestion, i think
it'll be moot, so thanks again.
Hello,
I ITP'ed FXRuby (libfox-ruby) some time ago. But in the meantime I've
been cought up in another project (typical ;) and also found unofficial
libfox-ruby packages[0] (for the unstable ruby interpreter). So I have
kind of lost interest in packaging it and want to RFP it instead as I
still
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 01:22:30PM +0100, Jonas Fonseca wrote:
Should I just file an RFP bug somehow or what should I do ?
Don't file a new one, retitle the old one to RFP.
Michael
Hi Jonas!
You wrote:
Should I just file an RFP bug somehow or what should I do ?
Just retitle the existing bug to an RFP.
--
Kind regards,
++
| Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7 |
Hi all
I'm trying to package a mozilla plugin (enigmail), but i have a
problem with build dependences because I need a precompiled mozilla tree.
I have several options.
Option a)
I omit the tar.gz sources and I use a xpi compiled by my own
The deb installs this xpi like the mozilla-locale
Hi Chad
On Sonntag, 26. Januar 2003 23:55, Chad Miller wrote:
This is something you should do if and when you're pretty sure that
you don't want your work to be just exercise. There's nothing
wrong with packaging something just for the experience, note; you
don't have to be a package
Celso,
Option c)
Create a mozilla-dev? package and use this one like build dependence
Guess what? There is already a mozilla-dev package. :-)
Simon
--
GPG Fingerprint: 040E B5F7 84F1 4FBC CEAD ADC6 18A0 CC8D 5706 A4B4
pgpBEej03Ntyk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 10:15:31PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
I'm using dh_perl to calculate the package dependencies for a perl
script in the cupsys-driver-gimpprint package. I thought this was
working, but it's not getting the dependencies right.
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 12:57:31PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
dh_perl doesn't (currently) attempt to calculate general module
dependencies, only core dependencies.
OK, thanks.
I guess that, due to the nature of the perl parser, adding this
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 02:25:46PM +0100, Simon Richter wrote:
Celso,
Option c)
Create a mozilla-dev? package and use this one like build dependence
Guess what? There is already a mozilla-dev package. :-)
Ups :-)
Great but terrible, now I have to fight with a long Makefile
I hope in
hey mentors
i'm working on a package that has a directory in /etc/sugarplum
and in this directory two conffiles and one other (empty) directory.
when i purge the package, i get:
balthasar[/home/seanius/sugarplum]13:17:02# dpkg --purge sugarplum
(Reading database ... 69541 files and directories
Colin Watson wrote:
I would use the various introspection-related modules to do this (maybe
Devel::Symdump or B?), but it's not possible to get it reliably correct
automatically. I think there are plenty of not-particularly-pathological
scripts and modules in the distribution that would easily
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 01:55:53PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Yes, it's very hard to get right and even if you do, mostly, there is
still the issue of mapping perl modules into debian packages, which
would be hard for debhelper to do, as it would have to depend on having
Mapping from a perl
Steve Kemp wrote:
Mapping from a perl module to a Debian package should be trivial,
I would have thought.
Given the system upon which dh_perl would be run would have the
modules installed it should be a simple matter of running
'dpkg --search path/to/perl/module.pm' - or am I missing
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 05:00:19PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
The module package may not even be installed, the module may be used
conditionally, a versioned dependency may be needed, multiple packages
may provide the same module (and a dependency on a virtual package or an
ored dependency
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 01:39:43PM -0500, sean finney wrote:
i'm working on a package that has a directory in /etc/sugarplum
and in this directory two conffiles and one other (empty) directory.
when i purge the package, i get:
balthasar[/home/seanius/sugarplum]13:17:02# dpkg --purge
sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
hey -mentors
i'm throwing together a cgi script package that requires certain
lines be added to the apache configuration file on the webserver
in order to work, so there's no way it can work out of the box as
far as i can figure, at least until apache
34 matches
Mail list logo
