Re: problems with debconf

2003-03-30 Thread Joey Hess
Frank Küster wrote: then debconf-show netenv says nothing, i.e. all the debconf items should be purged from the database Try 'debconf-how unknown' And now it is back. Is it possible that the problem comes from my testing of the scripts? Since the config script got fairly complex, I have

Searching for a sponsor for KSambaPlugin

2003-03-30 Thread Robert Grummt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey, people! I intent to package the KSambaPlugin Tool, but I'am not a Debian-Developer. So I need a sponsor, to create this Package. Here is a summary of this tool: * Package name : KSambaPlugin * Version : 0.4.2 * Upstream Authors :

Request for sponsor: mozilla-radialcontext package

2003-03-30 Thread David Pritchard
Hi, I've put together a new Debian package, mozilla-radialcontext. I'd like to find a sponsor to help me through the process of packaging. I've already put the package together, and it meets the Debian requirements (robust, passes almost all lintian tests). I'd just like someone to look it

Re: Request for sponsor: mozilla-radialcontext package

2003-03-30 Thread Mike Hommey
Hi David On Sunday 30 March 2003 21:38, David Pritchard wrote: Hi, I've put together a new Debian package, mozilla-radialcontext. I'd like to find a sponsor to help me through the process of packaging. [snip] I'm not a DD, but in the NM queue, and currently maintaining livehttpheaders,

Re: greetings! - PennMUSH debian package

2003-03-30 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Sat, 29 Mar 2003, Titus Barik wrote: 1. Is the license for PennMUSH okay? If it's standard artistic, then yes. 2. Is there any interest for such a package? From the incredibly long list of Packages of Dubious Interest (which I can't find now, but which was very funny when I

Re: upstream bugs

2003-03-30 Thread Russell Coker
On Sat, 29 Mar 2003 19:57, Tommaso Moroni wrote: I'm maintaining two Debian packages and both have an upstream bug, which I've already reported to the upstream authors. The bug fixes will be included in the next upstream release. My question is: Should I wait for a new upstream release or

Re: problems with debconf

2003-03-30 Thread Joey Hess
Frank Küster wrote: then debconf-show netenv says nothing, i.e. all the debconf items should be purged from the database Try 'debconf-how unknown' And now it is back. Is it possible that the problem comes from my testing of the scripts? Since the config script got fairly complex, I have

Searching for a sponsor for KSambaPlugin

2003-03-30 Thread Robert Grummt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey, people! I intent to package the KSambaPlugin Tool, but I'am not a Debian-Developer. So I need a sponsor, to create this Package. Here is a summary of this tool: * Package name : KSambaPlugin * Version : 0.4.2 * Upstream Authors :

Request for sponsor: mozilla-radialcontext package

2003-03-30 Thread David Pritchard
Hi, I've put together a new Debian package, mozilla-radialcontext. I'd like to find a sponsor to help me through the process of packaging. I've already put the package together, and it meets the Debian requirements (robust, passes almost all lintian tests). I'd just like someone to look it

Re: Request for sponsor: mozilla-radialcontext package

2003-03-30 Thread Mike Hommey
Hi David On Sunday 30 March 2003 21:38, David Pritchard wrote: Hi, I've put together a new Debian package, mozilla-radialcontext. I'd like to find a sponsor to help me through the process of packaging. [snip] I'm not a DD, but in the NM queue, and currently maintaining livehttpheaders,

Re: greetings! - PennMUSH debian package

2003-03-30 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Sat, 29 Mar 2003, Titus Barik wrote: 1. Is the license for PennMUSH okay? If it's standard artistic, then yes. 2. Is there any interest for such a package? From the incredibly long list of Packages of Dubious Interest (which I can't find now, but which was very funny when I

Re: greetings! - PennMUSH debian package

2003-03-30 Thread Jon Eisenstein
A few months back, I attempted to package TinyMUSH 3.0, but ran into some trouble with a few clauses that seemed to imply something wasn't quite DFSG free. I had submitted a report to the developers, and they expressed interest in making it compliant. I haven't really done much with the package