The buildd-logs[1] don't provide enough debug information?
I know this doesn't answer your question, but I assume the portability
issues you mention are all build problems in one of Debian's supported
architectures, am I right?
If so, the build logs[1] should give you more then enough help to track
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 08:28:55AM +, Alan Woodland wrote:
> For the next version of a package which I currently have sponsored in
> Debian (mozilla-mozgest) I want to add support for mozilla-firebird
> (preliminary packages are avalible from
> http://people.debian.org/~eric/debian/i386) and m
Mike Schacht wrote:
> I am not an official debian developer, but I maintain a couple of
> packages. One of them, kdirstat, is already in the official
> distribution. I intend to apply as a NM soon, but in the meantime,
> since the last update of kdirstat, I am having portability problems. I
> h
Hi,
Leo Costela Antunes wrote:
> The buildd-logs[1] don't provide enough debug information?
In this case not.
In many other cases also not...
Regards,
Rene
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL PROTE
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 12:25:37PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Mike Schacht wrote:
> > I am not an official debian developer, but I maintain a couple of
> > packages. One of them, kdirstat, is already in the official
> > distribution. I intend to apply as a NM soon, but in the meantime,
> > since
On Fri, 23 May 2003, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 03:06:19AM -0400, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
> > I am adopting wmakerconf and wmakerconf-data packages -- I've already
> > debianized the newest upstream versions (2.9 and 0.80.0 respectively) and
> Can you upload the packages
Mike Hommey wrote:
It's a bit much for too few. Just take a look at my mozilla-tabextensions
package, for instance. I think this is the best way to handle the situation.
BTW, I'm currently writing a mozilla extensions mini-policy, which should be
done by tomorrow, I'll send it on debian-devel f
On Tue, 27 May 2003, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 12:25:37PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Mike Schacht wrote:
> > > I am not an official debian developer, but I maintain a couple of
> > > packages. One of them, kdirstat, is already in the official
> > > distribution. I intend to ap
Hi all,
I've got a little question how to further procede with the
package scponly. There currently doesn't exist a debian
package for scponly (http://sublimation.org/scponly), but
there exists a bug report for it:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=no&bug=147456
It seems that n
Am Dienstag, 27. Mai 2003 23:06 schrieben Sie:
> On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 10:37:27PM +0200, Thomas Wana wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've got a little question how to further procede with the
> > package scponly. There currently doesn't exist a debian
> > package for scponly (http://sublimation.org/sc
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 12:25:37PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > This list of debian machines: http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi, shows
> > that some of the machines allow access by "all". There is no further
> > explanation of who qualifies as "all", or how someone who is "all" can
> > get access
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 09:24:28PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
>
> Another option is to use the compile farm at SourceForge. This is a bit
> more tricky, as you would have to be registered as a participant of one of
> project hosted there, but that is not a big problem.
Ah, now I wonder about
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 05:25:48PM -0300, Leo Costela Antunes wrote:
> The buildd-logs[1] don't provide enough debug information?
> I know this doesn't answer your question, but I assume the portability
> issues you mention are all build problems in one of Debian's supported
> architectures, am I r
For the next version of a package which I currently have sponsored in
Debian (mozilla-mozgest) I want to add support for mozilla-firebird
(preliminary packages are avalible from
http://people.debian.org/~eric/debian/i386) and mozilla-snapshot. The
problem is that in order to do this I need to d
Le 15 mai 2003, Loïc Le Guyader, à bout, prit son clavier pour
taper sur son écran:
> Hi all,
>
> Noèle Koethe is looking for someone to adopt distributed-net (client) and
> distributed-net-pproxy (personnal proxy). (see bug 185016)
>
> The two main task before adopting this package is to split i
Alan Woodland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Basicaly what I'd like to
> know is if theres a nicer way to test if a package is installed than
> just testing the existance of files that the package would create if
> it was installed?
Why not use
dpkg --get-selections $otherpackage | grep install
At 08:28 27/05/2003 +, you wrote:
For the next version of a package which I currently have sponsored in
Debian (mozilla-mozgest) I want to add support for mozilla-firebird
(preliminary packages are avalible from
http://people.debian.org/~eric/debian/i386) and mozilla-snapshot. The
problem
'dpkg -l ' has the official answer. Of course the package
_might_ have been removed manually, but in that case the user has
already messed up with all infrastructure we care to provide =]
I belive this method should be enough.
Cheers
On Ter, 2003-05-27 at 05:28, Alan Woodland wrote:
> For the nex
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 08:28:55AM +, Alan Woodland wrote:
> For the next version of a package which I currently have sponsored in
> Debian (mozilla-mozgest) I want to add support for mozilla-firebird
> (preliminary packages are avalible from
> http://people.debian.org/~eric/debian/i386) and
Hi Alan!
You wrote:
> For the next version of a package which I currently have sponsored in
> Debian (mozilla-mozgest) I want to add support for mozilla-firebird
> (preliminary packages are avalible from
> http://people.debian.org/~eric/debian/i386) and mozilla-snapshot. The
> problem is that
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 10:42:23AM -0300, Leo Costela Antunes wrote:
> 'dpkg -l ' has the official answer. Of course the
> package _might_ have been removed manually, but in that case the user
> has already messed up with all infrastructure we care to provide =] I
> belive this method should be eno
Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 11:53:08 +0200
To: Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: José Luis Tallón <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Querying what packages are installed in postinst
At 11:26 27/05/2003 +0200, you wrote:
Hi Alan!
You wrote:
> For the next version of a package which I currently
On Tuesday 27 May 2003 11:53, José Luis Tallón wrote:
[snip]
> >mozgest-mozilla:
> > Depends: mozilla-browser
> > Conflicts: mozgest-firebird, firebird
> > Replaces: mozgest-firebird
> > Provides: mozilla-gestures
> >
> >mozgest-firebird:
> > Depends: firebir
Hello,
I am not an official debian developer, but I maintain a couple of
packages. One of them, kdirstat, is already in the official
distribution. I intend to apply as a NM soon, but in the meantime,
since the last update of kdirstat, I am having portability problems. I
have no resources for
The buildd-logs[1] don't provide enough debug information?
I know this doesn't answer your question, but I assume the portability
issues you mention are all build problems in one of Debian's supported
architectures, am I right?
If so, the build logs[1] should give you more then enough help to track
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 08:28:55AM +, Alan Woodland wrote:
> For the next version of a package which I currently have sponsored in
> Debian (mozilla-mozgest) I want to add support for mozilla-firebird
> (preliminary packages are avalible from
> http://people.debian.org/~eric/debian/i386) and m
Mike Schacht wrote:
> I am not an official debian developer, but I maintain a couple of
> packages. One of them, kdirstat, is already in the official
> distribution. I intend to apply as a NM soon, but in the meantime,
> since the last update of kdirstat, I am having portability problems. I
> h
Hi,
Leo Costela Antunes wrote:
> The buildd-logs[1] don't provide enough debug information?
In this case not.
In many other cases also not...
Regards,
Rene
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL PROTE
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 12:25:37PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Mike Schacht wrote:
> > I am not an official debian developer, but I maintain a couple of
> > packages. One of them, kdirstat, is already in the official
> > distribution. I intend to apply as a NM soon, but in the meantime,
> > since
On Fri, 23 May 2003, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 03:06:19AM -0400, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
> > I am adopting wmakerconf and wmakerconf-data packages -- I've already
> > debianized the newest upstream versions (2.9 and 0.80.0 respectively) and
> Can you upload the packages
Mike Hommey wrote:
It's a bit much for too few. Just take a look at my mozilla-tabextensions
package, for instance. I think this is the best way to handle the situation.
BTW, I'm currently writing a mozilla extensions mini-policy, which should be
done by tomorrow, I'll send it on debian-devel
On Tue, 27 May 2003, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 12:25:37PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Mike Schacht wrote:
> > > I am not an official debian developer, but I maintain a couple of
> > > packages. One of them, kdirstat, is already in the official
> > > distribution. I intend to ap
Hi all,
I've got a little question how to further procede with the
package scponly. There currently doesn't exist a debian
package for scponly (http://sublimation.org/scponly), but
there exists a bug report for it:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=no&bug=147456
It seems that n
Am Dienstag, 27. Mai 2003 23:06 schrieben Sie:
> On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 10:37:27PM +0200, Thomas Wana wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've got a little question how to further procede with the
> > package scponly. There currently doesn't exist a debian
> > package for scponly (http://sublimation.org/sc
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 12:25:37PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > This list of debian machines: http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi, shows
> > that some of the machines allow access by "all". There is no further
> > explanation of who qualifies as "all", or how someone who is "all" can
> > get access
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 09:24:28PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
>
> Another option is to use the compile farm at SourceForge. This is a bit
> more tricky, as you would have to be registered as a participant of one of
> project hosted there, but that is not a big problem.
Ah, now I wonder about
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 05:25:48PM -0300, Leo Costela Antunes wrote:
> The buildd-logs[1] don't provide enough debug information?
> I know this doesn't answer your question, but I assume the portability
> issues you mention are all build problems in one of Debian's supported
> architectures, am I r
37 matches
Mail list logo
