On Sun, 8 Jun 2003 15:11:59 -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, you could do the chown at install time inside the postinst. That should
solve the problem nicely.
Which is what my package already does, but it does not even build with
the account not present. I am very
On Sun, 8 Jun 2003 21:01:07 -0400, Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 08:51:00PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
How am I supposed to handle this? Shall I change the build mechanisms
so that the account is not needed at build time, shall I pester
upstream to have that
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 09:30:11AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
Which is what my package already does, but it does not even build with
the account not present. I am very unsure about handling this.
Just kill the parts of the Makefile that insist on the chowning, and
after adding the user in
Hi Marc!
You wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2003 15:11:59 -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, you could do the chown at install time inside the postinst. That should
solve the problem nicely.
Which is what my package already does, but it does not even build with
the account
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 09:37:10AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2003 21:01:07 -0400, Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In either case, just disable whatever code is doing this.
It is acceptable to add code testing for account presence and not
chowning if the account is not
Hi.
Marc Haber wrote:
It is acceptable to add code testing for account presence and not
chowning if the account is not present? That way, I would be able to
give back patches to upstream.
I tend to agree with Colin's comment. How about asking upstream to provide an
option to specify whether to
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 10:50:04AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 10:10:33AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
However, before you do anything like this, you should check that
binary compatibilty was indeed broken and that the soname change was
correct.
Mmm, how do i
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 08:35:00AM +0300, Shaul Karl wrote:
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 09:01:07PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
If the files need
certain ownership on the installed system, set the permissions in postinst
(allowing for
Monday, June 9, 2003, 3:30:11 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (debian-mentors) wrote:
Marc On Sun, 8 Jun 2003 15:11:59 -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
Marc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, you could do the chown at install time inside the postinst. That should
solve the problem nicely.
Marc Which is what my
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 12:49:50PM -0400, Ed McMan wrote:
Monday, June 9, 2003, 3:30:11 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(debian-mentors) wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2003 15:11:59 -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, you could do the chown at install time inside the postinst.
That
I am attempting to find some information on packaging frozen
foods. We are a start up looking to package on of our products, can you
recommend someone or a company? Thanks.
Elliott Price wrote:
I am attempting to find some information on packaging frozen foods. We are
a start up looking to package on of our products, can you recommend someone
or a company? Thanks.
For packaging instructions, you should consult policy, the new maintainer's
guide, and the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello all again.
I have rebuilt the packages i asked you to try...
I have built them using pbuilder.
They have still linda warning and two lintian errors... the problem is that i
don't know how to fix them yet.
Could you please try them and give
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 09:01:07PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
If the files need
certain ownership on the installed system, set the permissions in postinst
(allowing for the user to dpkg-statoverride them if they want).
On Sun, 8 Jun 2003 15:11:59 -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, you could do the chown at install time inside the postinst. That should
solve the problem nicely.
Which is what my package already does, but it does not even build with
the account not present. I am very
On Sun, 8 Jun 2003 21:01:07 -0400, Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 08:51:00PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
How am I supposed to handle this? Shall I change the build mechanisms
so that the account is not needed at build time, shall I pester
upstream to have that
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 09:30:11AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
Which is what my package already does, but it does not even build with
the account not present. I am very unsure about handling this.
Just kill the parts of the Makefile that insist on the chowning, and
after adding the user in
Hi Marc!
You wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2003 15:11:59 -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, you could do the chown at install time inside the postinst. That
should
solve the problem nicely.
Which is what my package already does, but it does not even build with
the
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 09:37:10AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2003 21:01:07 -0400, Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In either case, just disable whatever code is doing this.
It is acceptable to add code testing for account presence and not
chowning if the account is not
Hi.
Marc Haber wrote:
It is acceptable to add code testing for account presence and not
chowning if the account is not present? That way, I would be able to
give back patches to upstream.
I tend to agree with Colin's comment. How about asking upstream to provide an
option to specify whether to
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 10:50:04AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 10:10:33AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
However, before you do anything like this, you should check that
binary compatibilty was indeed broken and that the soname change was
correct.
Mmm, how do i
Monday, June 9, 2003, 3:30:11 AM, debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
(debian-mentors) wrote:
Marc On Sun, 8 Jun 2003 15:11:59 -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
Marc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, you could do the chown at install time inside the postinst. That
should
solve the problem nicely.
Marc
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 12:49:50PM -0400, Ed McMan wrote:
Monday, June 9, 2003, 3:30:11 AM, debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
(debian-mentors) wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2003 15:11:59 -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, you could do the chown at install time inside the
I am attempting to find some information on packaging frozen
foods. We are a start up looking to package on of our products, can you
recommend someone or a company? Thanks.
Elliott Price wrote:
I am attempting to find some information on packaging frozen foods. We are
a start up looking to package on of our products, can you recommend someone
or a company? Thanks.
For packaging instructions, you should consult policy, the new maintainer's
guide, and the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello all again.
I have rebuilt the packages i asked you to try...
I have built them using pbuilder.
They have still linda warning and two lintian errors... the problem is that i
don't know how to fix them yet.
Could you please try them and give
26 matches
Mail list logo
