Hi francesco!
You wrote:
it is also multi user because profiles are stored in /usr/share so every
system user can access it, while it stores information in a home
subdirectory.
User profiles should not be stored in /usr, but probably in /var (if the
data changes, that is).
--
Kind regards,
On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 01:07:25PM +0200, francesco levorato wrote:
I am looking for sponsor for the package minido.
App site: http://michaelo.free.fr/minido/
Deb download from : http://flevour.mine.nu/debian/
thanks,
--
francesco levorato
flevour [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://flevour.mine.nu/
[Please CC me, as I'm not on debian-mentors.]
Thomas Viehmann wrote:
Aside from the results of the thread that followed (discuss with web people who
maintain WNPP lists etc.), I still think it uneccessarily lowers visibility of RFSs.
How's that? Rather than being available in the archives of
Hi.
Matt Kraai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote*:
[Please CC me, as I'm not on debian-mentors.]
Voluntary.
Thomas Viehmann wrote:
Aside from the results of the thread that followed (discuss with web people who
maintain WNPP lists etc.), I still think it uneccessarily lowers visibility of RFSs.
How's
Howdy,
Bug #198304 reports that the move of /usr/bin/svnshell from
subversion to subversion-tools broke upgrades, and suggests
subversion-tools conflict with older versions of subversion.
I was planning to add
Conflicts: subversion ( 0.22.1-1)
to subversion-tools's control fields (0.22.1-1
Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is this an almost never case?
No, this is what Replaces is for.
--
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 01:07:25PM +0200, francesco levorato wrote:
I am looking for sponsor for the package minido.
App site: http://michaelo.free.fr/minido/
Deb download from : http://flevour.mine.nu/debian/
thanks,
--
francesco levorato
flevour [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://flevour.mine.nu/
[Please CC me, as I'm not on debian-mentors.]
Thomas Viehmann wrote:
Aside from the results of the thread that followed (discuss with web people
who
maintain WNPP lists etc.), I still think it uneccessarily lowers visibility
of RFSs.
How's that? Rather than being available in the archives
Hi.
Matt Kraai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote*:
[Please CC me, as I'm not on debian-mentors.]
Voluntary.
Thomas Viehmann wrote:
Aside from the results of the thread that followed (discuss with web people
who
maintain WNPP lists etc.), I still think it uneccessarily lowers visibility
of RFSs.
Howdy,
Bug #198304 reports that the move of /usr/bin/svnshell from
subversion to subversion-tools broke upgrades, and suggests
subversion-tools conflict with older versions of subversion.
I was planning to add
Conflicts: subversion ( 0.22.1-1)
to subversion-tools's control fields (0.22.1-1
Hi!
* Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-07-01 23:20]:
Is this an almost never case?
I can't really answer your question, but:
[toto:~]$ grep-available -s Conflicts . | wc -l
461
[toto:~]$ grep-available -s Conflicts . | grep \\ | wc -l
212
So of all 461 Packages which declare a
Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is this an almost never case?
No, this is what Replaces is for.
--
James
Hi francesco!
You wrote:
it is also multi user because profiles are stored in /usr/share so every
system user can access it, while it stores information in a home
subdirectory.
User profiles should not be stored in /usr, but probably in /var (if the
data changes, that is).
--
Kind regards,
13 matches
Mail list logo