> Lintian, however, can't know that this particular library usually is
> preloaded, not linked to. Hence the override.
If its use is going to be something like that, please don't put it in
/usr/lib. That's what the lintian warning is about.
regards,
junichi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
> Lintian, however, can't know that this particular library usually is
> preloaded, not linked to. Hence the override.
If its use is going to be something like that, please don't put it in
/usr/lib. That's what the lintian warning is about.
regards,
junichi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
Hi there,
Thanks Roland for presenting the situation objectively. He has taken time to
elaborate on what led to the current undesirable situation and our IRC
discussion today. It is as he has said. I didn't see any significant
misrepresentation. [*]
I am very busy writing a paper and doing a b
Hi, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 07:07:01PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
>> My personal preference is to add a Lintian override, and leave it at
>> that.
>
> But the error says that it isn't a shared library at all, which is
> equally applicable to LD_PRELOADed libraries. The r
Hi there,
Thanks Roland for presenting the situation objectively. He has taken time to
elaborate on what led to the current undesirable situation and our IRC
discussion today. It is as he has said. I didn't see any significant
misrepresentation. [*]
I am very busy writing a paper and doing a b
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 07:07:01PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> My personal preference is to add a Lintian override, and leave it at
> that.
But the error says that it isn't a shared library at all, which is
equally applicable to LD_PRELOADed libraries. The right approach is to
find out *why*
Hi, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 07:07:01PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
>> My personal preference is to add a Lintian override, and leave it at
>> that.
>
> But the error says that it isn't a shared library at all, which is
> equally applicable to LD_PRELOADed libraries. The r
Hi, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> correct, so it does not belong in /usr/lib, it belongs in
> /usr/lib/snoopy or some such location.
IMHO it doesn't make much sense to create a subdirectory for a single
file. Besides, when developing sometimes you _do_ want to link to this
shared library. (I've do
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 07:07:01PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> My personal preference is to add a Lintian override, and leave it at
> that.
But the error says that it isn't a shared library at all, which is
equally applicable to LD_PRELOADed libraries. The right approach is to
find out *why*
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 06:25:55PM +0200, Roland Mas wrote:
>
..
>
> So he showed up on IRC today, demanded to talk to elmo (who didn't
> answer), started to be not-quite-rude-but-still-not-very-smooth to
> people present, and stated a few things that really got the heat
> started. Namely,
Hi, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> correct, so it does not belong in /usr/lib, it belongs in
> /usr/lib/snoopy or some such location.
IMHO it doesn't make much sense to create a subdirectory for a single
file. Besides, when developing sometimes you _do_ want to link to this
shared library. (I've do
Frederic Wagner (2003-07-25 15:33:31 +0200) :
> I'd like to maintain yadex, which I'm using quite often, for debian.
> Anyway it was about time for me to do something for debian, so
> adopting an existing package should be the right way to start.
>
> I've packaged it, changed changelog, and closed
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 06:25:55PM +0200, Roland Mas wrote:
>
..
>
> So he showed up on IRC today, demanded to talk to elmo (who didn't
> answer), started to be not-quite-rude-but-still-not-very-smooth to
> people present, and stated a few things that really got the heat
> started. Namely,
retitle 201391 ITA: yadex -- WAD file editor for doom-style WADs
stop
Hi,
I'd like to maintain yadex, which I'm using quite often, for debian.
Anyway it was about time for me to do something for debian, so adopting an
existing package should be the right way to start.
I've packaged it, changed c
Frederic Wagner (2003-07-25 15:33:31 +0200) :
> I'd like to maintain yadex, which I'm using quite often, for debian.
> Anyway it was about time for me to do something for debian, so
> adopting an existing package should be the right way to start.
>
> I've packaged it, changed changelog, and closed
retitle 201391 ITA: yadex -- WAD file editor for doom-style WADs
stop
Hi,
I'd like to maintain yadex, which I'm using quite often, for debian.
Anyway it was about time for me to do something for debian, so adopting an
existing package should be the right way to start.
I've packaged it, changed c
16 matches
Mail list logo
