Re: ITA: yadex -- WAD file editor for doom-style WADs

2003-07-28 Thread Frederic Wagner
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 04:06:55PM +0200, Roland Mas wrote: Frederic Wagner (2003-07-25 15:33:31 +0200) : hi, sorry for the little delay, the network connection has been down at the university. You should also close the ITA in the changelog, and change the Maintainer: field in debian/control.

Re: ITA: yadex -- WAD file editor for doom-style WADs

2003-07-28 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Hi. Frederic Wagner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: everything seems ok, except lintian gives me the following warning : W: yadex: copyright-lists-upstream-authors-with-dh_make-boilerplate which I don't fully understand. Try lintian -i. You've probably left Author(s): in there. As it is decidable

Re: ITA: yadex -- WAD file editor for doom-style WADs

2003-07-28 Thread Roland Mas
Frederic Wagner (2003-07-28 10:10:34 +0200) : everything seems ok, except lintian gives me the following warning : W: yadex: copyright-lists-upstream-authors-with-dh_make-boilerplate which I don't fully understand. There's a nice switch called -i for lintian that gives you more info on

Build-Recommends?

2003-07-28 Thread David Roundy
Is there such a thing as a Build-Recommends? Or a workaround that would give you its equivalent? The problem is that darcs can be compiled either with or without libcurl2-dev. The configure script will nicely notice if libcurl isn't available, in which case it just uses an external program

Re: Build-Recommends?

2003-07-28 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 08:14:03AM -0400, David Roundy wrote: Is there such a thing as a Build-Recommends? Or a workaround that would give you its equivalent? The problem is that darcs can be compiled either with or without libcurl2-dev. The configure script will nicely notice if libcurl

Re: Build-Recommends?

2003-07-28 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 08:14:03AM -0400, David Roundy wrote: Is there such a thing as a Build-Recommends? Or a workaround that would give you its equivalent? The problem is that darcs can be compiled either with or without libcurl2-dev. The configure script will nicely notice if libcurl

Re: Build-Recommends?

2003-07-28 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 14:14, David Roundy wrote: Is there such a thing as a Build-Recommends? Or a workaround that would give you its equivalent? The problem is that darcs can be compiled either with or without libcurl2-dev. The configure script will nicely notice if libcurl isn't

Re: Build-Recommends?

2003-07-28 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Michel! You wrote: Build-Depends: libcurl2-dev | curl | wget might serve as a workaround? I guees he would need something like (Build-Depends: libcurl2-dev) | (Depends: curl | wget) which isn't possible. -- Kind regards,

RFS: libi18n-java -- internationalization library for java

2003-07-28 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Hi all! I'm looking for a sponsor to upload libi18n-java which is a library I'll need for the next stable release of ArgoUML. http://vbstefi60.fapse.ulg.ac.be/~arnaud/libi18n-java-0.1.tar.gz Many thanks for your time and help, -- Arnaud Vandyck http://alioth.debian.org/users/arnaud-guest/

Sponsor vs. Developer Process?

2003-07-28 Thread Adam Kessel
I'm a little confused about the timeline of the sponsor vs. developer process. I have read the relevant documents at debian.org/devel. I filed an ITP on salonify, bug #201878. Salonify is an image gallery program. One developer on debian-devel complained that there were perhaps already too many

Re: Sponsor vs. Developer Process?

2003-07-28 Thread Joe Wreschnig
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 15:20, Adam Kessel wrote: I am wondering if it makes sense to try to find a sponsor to upload my package now, or wait to go through the entire DD process before trying to include salonify in Debian, or if it really matters which way I go? I understand it can take many

vimoutliner -- plea for sponsoring

2003-07-28 Thread Matej Cepl
Hi, I have created a package for vimoutliner. Is there anybody who would like to sponsor me? Package: vimoutliner Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Section: editors Installed-Size: 204 Maintainer: Matej Cepl [EMAIL PROTECTED] Version: 0.3.0-1 Depends: vim (=

Re: Sponsor vs. Developer Process?

2003-07-28 Thread Laurent Fousse
Hi, Le Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 04:20:33PM -0400, Adam Kessel écrivait: I am wondering if it makes sense to try to find a sponsor to upload my package now, or wait to go through the entire DD process before trying to include salonify in Debian, or if it really matters which way I go? I

RFS: vimoutliner

2003-07-28 Thread Matej Cepl
Hi, I have created a package for vimoutliner. Is there anybody who would like to sponsor me? Package: vimoutliner Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Section: editors Installed-Size: 204 Maintainer: Matej Cepl [EMAIL PROTECTED] Version: 0.3.0-1 Depends: vim (=

Re: RFS: pose - Palm OS Emulator (5th -and last- try)

2003-07-28 Thread Andreas Barth
* Marcin Orlowski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030728 23:05]: www.apt-get.org counts over 15000 packages at the moment and Juan shall register there too, to at least not waste all his efforts. But we can only guess how many of packages out there has been not requested for mention here due to others'

Re: Sponsor vs. Developer Process?

2003-07-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Adam Kessel wrote: I am wondering if it makes sense to try to find a sponsor to upload my package now, or wait to go through the entire DD process before trying to include salonify in Debian, or if it really matters which way I go? I yes. You won't be approved with no package in the

Re: RFS: pose - Palm OS Emulator (5th -and last- try)

2003-07-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Marcin Orlowski wrote: On Sunday of July 27 2003 20:09, Juan Manuel García Molina wrote: Over a month ago, pose package was orphaned. I'd like to take care of it, so I placed an ITA on wnpp. I've been working for a while in this package, but I can't upload it because I'm not yet a

Problems when packaging KTrack for Debian unstable

2003-07-28 Thread Jaime Robles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello all! I am trying to fix a ktrack's bug (Bug#203080) and i am having some problems as KTrack does not compile since i updated my unstable debian system... (apt-get upgrade). Some of the kdelibs has been upgraded (i suppose that) and maybe i am

Re: Problems when packaging KTrack for Debian unstable

2003-07-28 Thread Joshua Kwan
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:44:31PM +0200, Jaime Robles wrote: transponderdefinitionwidget.cpp: In constructor ` transponderDefinitionWidget::transponderDefinitionWidget(QWidget*, const char*, unsigned int)': transponderdefinitionwidget.cpp:46: error: invalid use of undefined type `

Re: Build-Recommends?

2003-07-28 Thread Craig Small
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 08:14:03AM -0400, David Roundy wrote: Is there such a thing as a Build-Recommends? Or a workaround that would give you its equivalent? The problem is that darcs can be compiled either with or without libcurl2-dev. The configure script will nicely notice if libcurl

Re: Sponsor vs. Developer Process?

2003-07-28 Thread Craig Small
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 04:20:33PM -0400, Adam Kessel wrote: I filed an ITP on salonify, bug #201878. Salonify is an image gallery program. One developer on debian-devel complained that there were perhaps already too many image gallery programs in Debian, but, as several other people

Re: Sponsor vs. Developer Process?

2003-07-28 Thread Craig Small
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:22:20PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: You won't be approved with no package in the archive. I don't think it is as clear-cut as that, but its probably a good way to think of it. Probably a better way of looking at it is if you don't have a package in the archive, you

Re: Sponsor vs. Developer Process?

2003-07-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Matthew Palmer wrote: On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:22:20PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: You won't be approved with no package in the archive. coughbullshitcough Unless things have changed in the 18 months or so I've been a DD. I had no packages sponsored or otherwise in the archive

Re: RFS: pose - Palm OS Emulator (5th -and last- try)

2003-07-28 Thread Larry Gilbert
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Matthew Palmer wrote: In the case of software for Palmpilots and whatnot, unless a DD has compatible hardware, they can't test it. (Incidentally, if someone really wants to get pose in, they can donate a Palm to me and I'll happily test and sponsor). Would you settle

Re: RFS: pose - Palm OS Emulator (5th -and last- try)

2003-07-28 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 05:56:07PM -0600, Larry Gilbert wrote: On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Matthew Palmer wrote: In the case of software for Palmpilots and whatnot, unless a DD has compatible hardware, they can't test it. (Incidentally, if someone really wants to get pose in, they can donate a

Re: Sponsor vs. Developer Process?

2003-07-28 Thread Joe Wreschnig
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 18:31, Rene Engelhard wrote: It _is_ so. Definitely. I was approved 7 months ago, with no package in the archive. This is clearly *not* exclusively the case. -- Joe Wreschnig [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: RFS: vimoutliner

2003-07-28 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:20:29PM +0200, Matej Cepl wrote: I have created a package for vimoutliner. Is there anybody who would like to sponsor me? [...] All relevant files are on ftp://ftp.ceplovi.cz/data/www/ceplovi/matej/progs/debian/ I'd be happy to, but: $ lftp

Re: Build-Recommends?

2003-07-28 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 04:20:06PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: You wrote: Build-Depends: libcurl2-dev | curl | wget might serve as a workaround? I guees he would need something like (Build-Depends: libcurl2-dev) | (Depends: curl | wget) which isn't possible. It is possible

RFS: libi18n-java -- internationalization library for java

2003-07-28 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Hi all! I'm looking for a sponsor to upload libi18n-java which is a library I'll need for the next stable release of ArgoUML. http://vbstefi60.fapse.ulg.ac.be/~arnaud/libi18n-java-0.1.tar.gz Many thanks for your time and help, -- Arnaud Vandyck http://alioth.debian.org/users/arnaud-guest/

Re: ITA: yadex -- WAD file editor for doom-style WADs

2003-07-28 Thread Frederic Wagner
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 04:06:55PM +0200, Roland Mas wrote: Frederic Wagner (2003-07-25 15:33:31 +0200) : hi, sorry for the little delay, the network connection has been down at the university. You should also close the ITA in the changelog, and change the Maintainer: field in debian/control.

Re: ITA: yadex -- WAD file editor for doom-style WADs

2003-07-28 Thread Roland Mas
Frederic Wagner (2003-07-28 10:10:34 +0200) : everything seems ok, except lintian gives me the following warning : W: yadex: copyright-lists-upstream-authors-with-dh_make-boilerplate which I don't fully understand. There's a nice switch called -i for lintian that gives you more info on

Build-Recommends?

2003-07-28 Thread David Roundy
Is there such a thing as a Build-Recommends? Or a workaround that would give you its equivalent? The problem is that darcs can be compiled either with or without libcurl2-dev. The configure script will nicely notice if libcurl isn't available, in which case it just uses an external program

Re: Build-Recommends?

2003-07-28 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 08:14:03AM -0400, David Roundy wrote: Is there such a thing as a Build-Recommends? Or a workaround that would give you its equivalent? The problem is that darcs can be compiled either with or without libcurl2-dev. The configure script will nicely notice if libcurl

Re: Build-Recommends?

2003-07-28 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 08:14:03AM -0400, David Roundy wrote: Is there such a thing as a Build-Recommends? Or a workaround that would give you its equivalent? The problem is that darcs can be compiled either with or without libcurl2-dev. The configure script will nicely notice if libcurl

Re: Build-Recommends?

2003-07-28 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 14:14, David Roundy wrote: Is there such a thing as a Build-Recommends? Or a workaround that would give you its equivalent? The problem is that darcs can be compiled either with or without libcurl2-dev. The configure script will nicely notice if libcurl isn't

Re: Build-Recommends?

2003-07-28 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Michel! You wrote: Build-Depends: libcurl2-dev | curl | wget might serve as a workaround? I guees he would need something like (Build-Depends: libcurl2-dev) | (Depends: curl | wget) which isn't possible. -- Kind regards,

Sponsor vs. Developer Process?

2003-07-28 Thread Adam Kessel
I'm a little confused about the timeline of the sponsor vs. developer process. I have read the relevant documents at debian.org/devel. I filed an ITP on salonify, bug #201878. Salonify is an image gallery program. One developer on debian-devel complained that there were perhaps already too many

Re: Sponsor vs. Developer Process?

2003-07-28 Thread Joe Wreschnig
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 15:20, Adam Kessel wrote: I am wondering if it makes sense to try to find a sponsor to upload my package now, or wait to go through the entire DD process before trying to include salonify in Debian, or if it really matters which way I go? I understand it can take many

vimoutliner -- plea for sponsoring

2003-07-28 Thread Matej Cepl
Hi, I have created a package for vimoutliner. Is there anybody who would like to sponsor me? Package: vimoutliner Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Section: editors Installed-Size: 204 Maintainer: Matej Cepl [EMAIL PROTECTED] Version: 0.3.0-1 Depends: vim (=

Re: RFS: pose - Palm OS Emulator (5th -and last- try)

2003-07-28 Thread Marcin Orlowski
On Sunday of July 27 2003 20:09, Juan Manuel García Molina wrote: Over a month ago, pose package was orphaned. I'd like to take care of it, so I placed an ITA on wnpp. I've been working for a while in this package, but I can't upload it because I'm not yet a Debian Developer. It's my 5th try

Re: Sponsor vs. Developer Process?

2003-07-28 Thread Laurent Fousse
Hi, Le Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 04:20:33PM -0400, Adam Kessel écrivait: I am wondering if it makes sense to try to find a sponsor to upload my package now, or wait to go through the entire DD process before trying to include salonify in Debian, or if it really matters which way I go? I

RFS: vimoutliner

2003-07-28 Thread Matej Cepl
Hi, I have created a package for vimoutliner. Is there anybody who would like to sponsor me? Package: vimoutliner Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Section: editors Installed-Size: 204 Maintainer: Matej Cepl [EMAIL PROTECTED] Version: 0.3.0-1 Depends: vim (=

Re: RFS: pose - Palm OS Emulator (5th -and last- try)

2003-07-28 Thread Andreas Barth
* Marcin Orlowski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030728 23:05]: www.apt-get.org counts over 15000 packages at the moment and Juan shall register there too, to at least not waste all his efforts. But we can only guess how many of packages out there has been not requested for mention here due to others'

Re: Sponsor vs. Developer Process?

2003-07-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Adam Kessel wrote: I am wondering if it makes sense to try to find a sponsor to upload my package now, or wait to go through the entire DD process before trying to include salonify in Debian, or if it really matters which way I go? I yes. You won't be approved with no package in the

Re: RFS: pose - Palm OS Emulator (5th -and last- try)

2003-07-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Marcin Orlowski wrote: On Sunday of July 27 2003 20:09, Juan Manuel García Molina wrote: Over a month ago, pose package was orphaned. I'd like to take care of it, so I placed an ITA on wnpp. I've been working for a while in this package, but I can't upload it because I'm not yet a

Problems when packaging KTrack for Debian unstable

2003-07-28 Thread Jaime Robles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello all! I am trying to fix a ktrack's bug (Bug#203080) and i am having some problems as KTrack does not compile since i updated my unstable debian system... (apt-get upgrade). Some of the kdelibs has been upgraded (i suppose that) and maybe i am

Re: Problems when packaging KTrack for Debian unstable

2003-07-28 Thread Joshua Kwan
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:44:31PM +0200, Jaime Robles wrote: transponderdefinitionwidget.cpp: In constructor ` transponderDefinitionWidget::transponderDefinitionWidget(QWidget*, const char*, unsigned int)': transponderdefinitionwidget.cpp:46: error: invalid use of undefined type `

Re: Build-Recommends?

2003-07-28 Thread Craig Small
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 08:14:03AM -0400, David Roundy wrote: Is there such a thing as a Build-Recommends? Or a workaround that would give you its equivalent? The problem is that darcs can be compiled either with or without libcurl2-dev. The configure script will nicely notice if libcurl

Re: Sponsor vs. Developer Process?

2003-07-28 Thread Craig Small
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 04:20:33PM -0400, Adam Kessel wrote: I filed an ITP on salonify, bug #201878. Salonify is an image gallery program. One developer on debian-devel complained that there were perhaps already too many image gallery programs in Debian, but, as several other people

Re: Sponsor vs. Developer Process?

2003-07-28 Thread Craig Small
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:22:20PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: You won't be approved with no package in the archive. I don't think it is as clear-cut as that, but its probably a good way to think of it. Probably a better way of looking at it is if you don't have a package in the archive, you

Re: Sponsor vs. Developer Process?

2003-07-28 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:22:20PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: You won't be approved with no package in the archive. coughbullshitcough Unless things have changed in the 18 months or so I've been a DD. I had no packages sponsored or otherwise in the archive for about the first month or so

Re: Sponsor vs. Developer Process?

2003-07-28 Thread Adam Kessel
Thanks for your response-- On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 08:47:46AM +1000, Craig Small wrote: So I applied to become a DD, got my key signed and my application verified, and now I am waiting for an AM assignment. Make sure you've done your homework. The key is signed, good! Is the package

Re: RFS: pose - Palm OS Emulator (5th -and last- try)

2003-07-28 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:04:34PM +0200, Marcin Orlowski wrote: all doing your Debian work in own spare time, but doesn't this ring a bell that there is something in the whole procedure that simply does not work? OK, please suggest a better way. Criteria to be fulfilled are: 1) Nobody should

Re: Sponsor vs. Developer Process?

2003-07-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Matthew Palmer wrote: On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:22:20PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: You won't be approved with no package in the archive. coughbullshitcough Unless things have changed in the 18 months or so I've been a DD. I had no packages sponsored or otherwise in the archive

Re: RFS: pose - Palm OS Emulator (5th -and last- try)

2003-07-28 Thread Larry Gilbert
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Matthew Palmer wrote: In the case of software for Palmpilots and whatnot, unless a DD has compatible hardware, they can't test it. (Incidentally, if someone really wants to get pose in, they can donate a Palm to me and I'll happily test and sponsor). Would you settle

Re: RFS: pose - Palm OS Emulator (5th -and last- try)

2003-07-28 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 05:56:07PM -0600, Larry Gilbert wrote: On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Matthew Palmer wrote: In the case of software for Palmpilots and whatnot, unless a DD has compatible hardware, they can't test it. (Incidentally, if someone really wants to get pose in, they can donate a

Re: Sponsor vs. Developer Process?

2003-07-28 Thread Joe Wreschnig
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 18:31, Rene Engelhard wrote: It _is_ so. Definitely. I was approved 7 months ago, with no package in the archive. This is clearly *not* exclusively the case. -- Joe Wreschnig [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: RFS: vimoutliner

2003-07-28 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:20:29PM +0200, Matej Cepl wrote: I have created a package for vimoutliner. Is there anybody who would like to sponsor me? [...] All relevant files are on ftp://ftp.ceplovi.cz/data/www/ceplovi/matej/progs/debian/ I'd be happy to, but: $ lftp

Re: Build-Recommends?

2003-07-28 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 04:20:06PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: You wrote: Build-Depends: libcurl2-dev | curl | wget might serve as a workaround? I guees he would need something like (Build-Depends: libcurl2-dev) | (Depends: curl | wget) which isn't possible. It is possible