On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Vineet Kumar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was thinking about packaging jta as well. I then noticed that it was
> already on the prospective packages page already. Then I noticed that
> it looks like nothing has happened on it in a long time. Is it still
> being worked on? Or should
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Vineet Kumar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was thinking about packaging jta as well. I then noticed that it was
> already on the prospective packages page already. Then I noticed that
> it looks like nothing has happened on it in a long time. Is it still
> being worked on? Or should
There have been some discussions pertaining to my package, gnat-gdb.
The consensus was that it was a nice and desirable addition to Debian.
My package is ready for download[1,2]. I would like someone to sponsor
it for me. Here is the head of the changelog:
gnat-gdb (5.3.gnat.0.0.20030225-1) uns
There have been some discussions pertaining to my package, gnat-gdb.
The consensus was that it was a nice and desirable addition to Debian.
My package is ready for download[1,2]. I would like someone to sponsor
it for me. Here is the head of the changelog:
gnat-gdb (5.3.gnat.0.0.20030225-1) uns
Sven Luther wrote:
BTW, the attachement is of md5sum b09e26c292759d654633d3c8ed00d18d.
Anyone know of an easy way to filter out emails where a given
attachement has a particular md5sum ? My tries with uudeview, grep, sed
and med5sum where not that much of a success.
I personnaly use the sanitiz
Hi, Bob Proulx wrote:
> As packages are normally upgraded through the life of a system I train
> people to always say 'Y' to the replace a conffile question. Sure
> this may leave the system in a generic and locally unworkable state.
So why not "N"? That may leave the package, at worst, in a "I
Sven Luther wrote:
BTW, the attachement is of md5sum b09e26c292759d654633d3c8ed00d18d.
Anyone know of an easy way to filter out emails where a given
attachement has a particular md5sum ? My tries with uudeview, grep, sed
and med5sum where not that much of a success.
I personnaly use the sanitizer f
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Thomas -Balu- Walter wrote:
> Please get your machines offline and scan them with a recent
The d.o ML addresses can be found everywhere on the net (html pages,
archives, such as
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2003/debian-mentors-200308/msg00352.html)
and therefore even
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 05:01:25PM +0200, Thomas -Balu- Walter wrote:
> Okay guys, this is fairly offtopic, but I keep getting _massive_ amounts
> of email to my debian-lists address [EMAIL PROTECTED] which makes me
> believe, that many subscribers here are infected with W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
>
Thomas -Balu- Walter wrote:
Okay guys, this is fairly offtopic, but I keep getting _massive_ amounts
of email to my debian-lists address [EMAIL PROTECTED] which makes me
believe, that many subscribers here are infected with W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
AOL.
Please do this especially if your IP is o
Hi, Bob Proulx wrote:
> As packages are normally upgraded through the life of a system I train
> people to always say 'Y' to the replace a conffile question. Sure
> this may leave the system in a generic and locally unworkable state.
So why not "N"? That may leave the package, at worst, in a "I
Okay guys, this is fairly offtopic, but I keep getting _massive_ amounts
of email to my debian-lists address [EMAIL PROTECTED] which makes me
believe, that many subscribers here are infected with W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Thomas -Balu- Walter wrote:
> Please get your machines offline and scan them with a recent
The d.o ML addresses can be found everywhere on the net (html pages,
archives, such as
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2003/debian-mentors-200308/msg00352.html)
and therefore even
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 05:01:25PM +0200, Thomas -Balu- Walter wrote:
> Okay guys, this is fairly offtopic, but I keep getting _massive_ amounts
> of email to my debian-lists address [EMAIL PROTECTED] which makes me
> believe, that many subscribers here are infected with W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
>
Thomas -Balu- Walter wrote:
Okay guys, this is fairly offtopic, but I keep getting _massive_ amounts
of email to my debian-lists address [EMAIL PROTECTED] which makes me
believe, that many subscribers here are infected with W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
AOL.
Please do this especially if your IP is on the
Okay guys, this is fairly offtopic, but I keep getting _massive_ amounts
of email to my debian-lists address [EMAIL PROTECTED] which makes me
believe, that many subscribers here are infected with W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http:
Hi, Craig Small wrote:
> Why cannot objectclasses be added? I have done that several times.
That's a limitation in the LDAP server. I filed a bug about this a few
months ago, but they said this is how things are supposed to work. :-/
Clients usually do that by deleting and recreating the object
17 matches
Mail list logo
