Hallo,
Wenn sie diesen Newsletter erhalten wollen klicken sie bitte auf die Internet-Adresse.
Falls sie diesen Newsletter nicht wollen löschen sie einfach diese E-Mail.
Aktivierungslink: http://www.0800news.de/cgi-bin/newsletter.cgi?id=tom643[EMAIL
PROTECTED]key=nI9vF5Pauzwaction=aktiv
Mit
Hello,
How do I conflict with a certain range of versions?
The package is exim4 and I want to conflict with passwd =1:* but
=1:4.0.3-8. - Both versions up to 2902-12 and later than
1:4.0.3-8 work for me and I do not want to conflict with them.
Is there a nicer way than
Conflicts: passwd
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 03:07:59AM +0100, David Weinehall wrote:
[snip]
Of course, UTF-8 whereever possible is a nice goal to strive after,
and I think that the debian-specific files are a good place to start.
Would the place to start not be to make sure that every piece of debian
supports
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 01:40:35PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 03:07:59AM +0100, David Weinehall wrote:
Of course, UTF-8 whereever possible is a nice goal to strive after,
and I think that the debian-specific files are a good place to start.
Would the place to start
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 02:48:01PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 01:40:35PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 03:07:59AM +0100, David Weinehall wrote:
Of course, UTF-8 whereever possible is a nice goal to strive after,
and I think that the
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 04:38:23PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 02:48:01PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
Depends how practical that is, I guess. For example, it's still unknown
when groff will support it properly (as in UTF-8 input; UTF-8 output is
more or less OK now),
Hi,
this question does not pertain specifically to debian-boot,
but it deals with things which i think the readers of this list have a
particular knowledge of, so here goes:
My main root partition is /dev/hda2, and it is encrypted via ppdd.
I have a maintenance/fake root partition at /dev/hda6.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 05:22:36PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 04:38:23PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 02:48:01PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
Depends how practical that is, I guess. For example, it's still unknown
when groff will support it
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 07:00:26PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 05:22:36PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 04:38:23PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
Yep, noticed that also, man simply removes the - from manpages,
which is a pain, as they get used pretty
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 07:44:35PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 07:00:26PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 05:22:36PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 04:38:23PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
Yep, noticed that also, man simply removes
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sarge systems support UTF-8 really quite well, though, with a tiny bit
of locales configuration. Even woody systems support them with only a
few unpleasant bugs.
Testing this the other day with groff: using framebuffer utf-8 console
and GNOME terminal
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Sven Luther wrote:
I choose fr_FR.UTF8 or something such in gnome GDM.
And it IS just like that in your /etc/locale.gen as well? fr_FR only won't
do.
--
One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the
I am almost finished with my debian bootsplash packages. These packages
contain the bootsplash suite, from the kernel patches to the userland
utilites, to themes (two so far). Also I am planning a package to contain
the modified rc and rcS files necessary to make bootsplash work properly
Hello,
How do I conflict with a certain range of versions?
The package is exim4 and I want to conflict with passwd =1:* but
=1:4.0.3-8. - Both versions up to 2902-12 and later than
1:4.0.3-8 work for me and I do not want to conflict with them.
Is there a nicer way than
Conflicts: passwd
Hallo,
Wenn sie diesen Newsletter erhalten wollen klicken sie bitte auf die
Internet-Adresse.
Falls sie diesen Newsletter nicht wollen löschen sie einfach diese E-Mail.
Aktivierungslink:
http://www.0800news.de/cgi-bin/newsletter.cgi?id=tom643[EMAIL
PROTECTED]key=nI9vF5Pauzwaction=aktiv
Mit
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 03:07:59AM +0100, David Weinehall wrote:
[snip]
Of course, UTF-8 whereever possible is a nice goal to strive after,
and I think that the debian-specific files are a good place to start.
Would the place to start not be to make sure that every piece of debian
supports
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 12:41:20PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On a sidenote I wonder whether I should actually bother with this. -
The version in woody and the versions currently available in sid and
sarge are ok, 1:4.0.3-9 was uploaded almost half a year ago (20 Aug
2003), is it necessary
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 01:40:35PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 03:07:59AM +0100, David Weinehall wrote:
Of course, UTF-8 whereever possible is a nice goal to strive after,
and I think that the debian-specific files are a good place to start.
Would the place to start
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 02:48:01PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 01:40:35PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 03:07:59AM +0100, David Weinehall wrote:
Of course, UTF-8 whereever possible is a nice goal to strive after,
and I think that the
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 04:38:23PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 02:48:01PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
Depends how practical that is, I guess. For example, it's still unknown
when groff will support it properly (as in UTF-8 input; UTF-8 output is
more or less OK now),
Hi,
this question does not pertain specifically to debian-boot,
but it deals with things which i think the readers of this list have a
particular knowledge of, so here goes:
My main root partition is /dev/hda2, and it is encrypted via ppdd.
I have a maintenance/fake root partition at /dev/hda6.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 05:22:36PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 04:38:23PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 02:48:01PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
Depends how practical that is, I guess. For example, it's still unknown
when groff will support it
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 07:00:26PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 05:22:36PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 04:38:23PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
Yep, noticed that also, man simply removes the - from manpages,
which is a pain, as they get used pretty
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sarge systems support UTF-8 really quite well, though, with a tiny bit
of locales configuration. Even woody systems support them with only a
few unpleasant bugs.
Testing this the other day with groff: using framebuffer utf-8 console
and GNOME terminal
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Sven Luther wrote:
I choose fr_FR.UTF8 or something such in gnome GDM.
And it IS just like that in your /etc/locale.gen as well? fr_FR only won't
do.
--
One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 07:44:35PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 07:00:26PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 05:22:36PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 04:38:23PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
Yep, noticed that also, man simply removes
26 matches
Mail list logo
