Some time tommorrow (aka in the morning/afternoon) I should release
updated (and IMO improved) versons of my bootsplash packages. I have
moved some stuff around and added some config options. Right now the only
thing keeping me from uploading these packages to mentors.debian.net are
licence c
Le Lundi 29 Décembre 2003 23:54, Jochen Friedrich a écrit :
> Hi Benoit,
>
> > i just uploaded ike-scan 1.5.1 to mentors.debian.net and i'am looking
> > for a sponsor.
> >
> > The package is lintian and linda clean, here is the control file
>
> - you should provide the file downloaded from
> http
On 30.12.03 12:12 Benoit Mortier wrote:
Le Lundi 29 Décembre 2003 23:54, Jochen Friedrich a écrit :
[...]
- do you really need to link /usr/share/doc/ike-scan to /usr/doc?
If not, you might remove the postinst and prerm scripts.
thats what lintian wanted but linda not so i removed it
You should u
Hello,
I packaged [1] sipcalc [2] and I'm looking for a sponsor for the
package. I already have the dnstop package in Debian. Sipcalc is lintian
and linda clean and available for review [3].
Bernhard, I am cc-ing this to you, because you sponsor my dnstop
package.
---
Sipcalc is an advanced conso
Hi.
I just wanted to ask again for a sponsor for
for eli.
Packages are available at:
deb http://www.lichtenheld.de/debian ./
deb-src http://www.lichtenheld.de/debian ./
I've also attached the changelog for eli which is already rather
long since I'm maintaining this package locally for over a yea
Le Mardi 30 Décembre 2003 14:20, Andreas Metzler a écrit :
> On 30.12.03 12:12 Benoit Mortier wrote:
> > Le Lundi 29 Décembre 2003 23:54, Jochen Friedrich a écrit :
>
> [...]
>
> >> - do you really need to link /usr/share/doc/ike-scan to /usr/doc?
> >> If not, you might remove the postinst and pr
Although philosophically more aligned with Debian, I had been a RedHat
user for almost 8 years largely pragmatic reasons that aren't
relevant. As such, I have developed a large rpm-based infrastructure
for releasing my company's own software to our production facilities
and have become quite fami
Hi.
I suppose you have already found the most generic pointers like new
maintainer guide ans such.
Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> As far as I can tell, a Debian package consists of a single source
> tarball and a single diff. Is this right, or have I missed something?
> Coming from an rpm perspective,
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> As far as I can tell, a Debian package consists of a single source
> tarball and a single diff. Is this right, or have I missed something?
It's right, a Debian source package is usually distributed as a single
source and a single diff (sometimes there
(B $BL$>5Bz9-9p"((B $B$4LBOG$JJ}$O:o=|$7$F$/[EMAIL PROTECTED](B
$B!!Ev9-9p$rkM[;T;{ED#8!]#2(B
(B$BBeI=uBV$G$9!#:#Bg>fIW$G$b(B
$B$"$J$?$K$$$D%j%9%H%iEy$NIT9,$,=1$C$F$/$k$+$o$+$j$^$;$s!#(B
$B$^$?0lHL=nL1$,2?$+;v6H$r$d$m$&$H;
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 11:06:35AM -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> Now I'm strongly considering making the switch to Debian and am
> evaluating moving my whole installation system over to dpkg. dpkg
> seems superior to rpm in almost all respects (richer dependencies,
> better documentation, more r
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 05:56:33PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is also not uncommon to make an orig.tar.gz of (possibly multiple)
> upstream tarballs by putting them in a directory and tarring that.
Ofcourse you mean tar+gzip that, as orig is always tar.gz; alhough I
thi
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 08:55:55PM +0100, GCS wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 05:56:33PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It is also not uncommon to make an orig.tar.gz of (possibly multiple)
> > upstream tarballs by putting them in a directory and tarring that.
> Ofcourse y
Some time tommorrow (aka in the morning/afternoon) I should release
updated (and IMO improved) versons of my bootsplash packages. I have
moved some stuff around and added some config options. Right now the only
thing keeping me from uploading these packages to mentors.debian.net are
licence c
Le Lundi 29 Décembre 2003 23:54, Jochen Friedrich a écrit :
> Hi Benoit,
>
> > i just uploaded ike-scan 1.5.1 to mentors.debian.net and i'am looking
> > for a sponsor.
> >
> > The package is lintian and linda clean, here is the control file
>
> - you should provide the file downloaded from
> http
On 30.12.03 12:12 Benoit Mortier wrote:
Le Lundi 29 Décembre 2003 23:54, Jochen Friedrich a écrit :
[...]
- do you really need to link /usr/share/doc/ike-scan to /usr/doc?
If not, you might remove the postinst and prerm scripts.
thats what lintian wanted but linda not so i removed it
You
Hello,
I packaged [1] sipcalc [2] and I'm looking for a sponsor for the
package. I already have the dnstop package in Debian. Sipcalc is lintian
and linda clean and available for review [3].
Bernhard, I am cc-ing this to you, because you sponsor my dnstop
package.
---
Sipcalc is an advanced conso
Hi.
I just wanted to ask again for a sponsor for
for eli.
Packages are available at:
deb http://www.lichtenheld.de/debian ./
deb-src http://www.lichtenheld.de/debian ./
I've also attached the changelog for eli which is already rather
long since I'm maintaining this package locally for over a yea
Le Mardi 30 Décembre 2003 14:20, Andreas Metzler a écrit :
> On 30.12.03 12:12 Benoit Mortier wrote:
> > Le Lundi 29 Décembre 2003 23:54, Jochen Friedrich a écrit :
>
> [...]
>
> >> - do you really need to link /usr/share/doc/ike-scan to /usr/doc?
> >> If not, you might remove the postinst and pr
Although philosophically more aligned with Debian, I had been a RedHat
user for almost 8 years largely pragmatic reasons that aren't
relevant. As such, I have developed a large rpm-based infrastructure
for releasing my company's own software to our production facilities
and have become quite fami
Hi.
I suppose you have already found the most generic pointers like new
maintainer guide ans such.
Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> As far as I can tell, a Debian package consists of a single source
> tarball and a single diff. Is this right, or have I missed something?
> Coming from an rpm perspective,
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> As far as I can tell, a Debian package consists of a single source
> tarball and a single diff. Is this right, or have I missed something?
It's right, a Debian source package is usually distributed as a single
source and a single diff (sometimes there
未承諾広告※ ご迷惑な方は削除してください。
当広告を受信拒否の方は次のメールアドレスに〔受信拒否〕
として送信してください。その日のうちに削除いたします。ご迷惑でしょうがよろしくお願いいたします
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 販売者 ギフト 所在地 京都府城陽市寺田８−２
代表者 山本しおり TEL 0774-56-6428
5000円で開業しませんか！！
世の中不景気がいつまでも続き先が見え
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 05:56:33PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> It is also not uncommon to make an orig.tar.gz of (possibly multiple)
> upstream tarballs by putting them in a directory and tarring that.
Ofcourse you mean tar+gzip that, as orig is always tar.gz; alhough I
th
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 11:06:35AM -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> Now I'm strongly considering making the switch to Debian and am
> evaluating moving my whole installation system over to dpkg. dpkg
> seems superior to rpm in almost all respects (richer dependencies,
> better documentation, more r
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 08:55:55PM +0100, GCS wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 05:56:33PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > It is also not uncommon to make an orig.tar.gz of (possibly multiple)
> > upstream tarballs by putting them in a directory and tarring that.
> Ofcours
26 matches
Mail list logo
