Hi, just to announce that TORCS[0] Debian package[1] is ready for testing, you
can
grab it from mentors[2]. There is a i396 package and the sources, if you are
going to compile it, I encourage you to use libfreeglut3-dev package which is
in the same archive and actually torcs builds better with it
Hi, just to announce that TORCS[0] Debian package[1] is ready for testing, you can
grab it from mentors[2]. There is a i396 package and the sources, if you are
going to compile it, I encourage you to use libfreeglut3-dev package which is
in the same archive and actually torcs builds better with it.
At 00:24 +0200 05 Apr 2004, Stefan Fritsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Upstream supports only i386 and I somehow doubt that the source is 64bit
> clean (I currently have no way to test this, though). What is the
> preferred method of handling this? Just set architecture to any and see
> what happe
On Sun, 2004-04-04 at 19:20, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> "Bruno Barrera C." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Sun, 2004-04-04 at 18:24, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> >> On Sun, 4 Apr 2004, Bruno Barrera C. wrote:
> >> > - I Think you must read [0](Looking at the Architecture field)
> >> Upstream sup
"Bruno Barrera C." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 2004-04-04 at 18:24, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
>> On Sun, 4 Apr 2004, Bruno Barrera C. wrote:
>> > - I Think you must read [0](Looking at the Architecture field)
>> Upstream supports only i386 and I somehow doubt that the source is 64bit
>> clean
Hello,
On Sun, 2004-04-04 at 18:24, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> Hi Bruno,
>
> thanks for your comments. I have some questions though.
>
> On Sun, 4 Apr 2004, Bruno Barrera C. wrote:
>
> > - I Think you must read [0](Looking at the Architecture field)
>
> Upstream supports only i386 and I somehow d
At 00:24 +0200 05 Apr 2004, Stefan Fritsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Upstream supports only i386 and I somehow doubt that the source is 64bit
> clean (I currently have no way to test this, though). What is the
> preferred method of handling this? Just set architecture to any and see
> what happe
Hi Bruno,
thanks for your comments. I have some questions though.
On Sun, 4 Apr 2004, Bruno Barrera C. wrote:
> - I Think you must read [0](Looking at the Architecture field)
Upstream supports only i386 and I somehow doubt that the source is 64bit
clean (I currently have no way to test this, th
Hi,
Still no sponsor.
Anyone?
/Steffen
On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 09:27, Steffen Nissen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am the upstream maintainer (and initial developer of) the Fast
> Artificial Neural Network Library (fann).
> http://fann.sourceforge.net/
>
> I have made two debian packages for the new 1.1.0
On Sun, 2004-04-04 at 19:20, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> "Bruno Barrera C." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Sun, 2004-04-04 at 18:24, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> >> On Sun, 4 Apr 2004, Bruno Barrera C. wrote:
> >> > - I Think you must read [0](Looking at the Architecture field)
> >> Upstream sup
"Bruno Barrera C." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 2004-04-04 at 18:24, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
>> On Sun, 4 Apr 2004, Bruno Barrera C. wrote:
>> > - I Think you must read [0](Looking at the Architecture field)
>> Upstream supports only i386 and I somehow doubt that the source is 64bit
>> clean
Hello,
On Sun, 2004-04-04 at 18:24, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> Hi Bruno,
>
> thanks for your comments. I have some questions though.
>
> On Sun, 4 Apr 2004, Bruno Barrera C. wrote:
>
> > - I Think you must read [0](Looking at the Architecture field)
>
> Upstream supports only i386 and I somehow d
Hi Bruno,
thanks for your comments. I have some questions though.
On Sun, 4 Apr 2004, Bruno Barrera C. wrote:
> - I Think you must read [0](Looking at the Architecture field)
Upstream supports only i386 and I somehow doubt that the source is 64bit
clean (I currently have no way to test this, th
Hello,
I'm seeking a sponsor for the package rzip. rzip is very efficient in
compressing large files because it has an effective buffer of 900MB -
bzip2 has one of 32KB. It's slower than bzip2 and cannot be used in a
pipe, but the results are worth it - see the homepage for some
benchmarks.
Her
Hello mentors,
I need someone to upload a small transitional package for drgenius. This
program has been renamed to drgeo and is already packaged for Sarge.
Unfortunately, the old package is still in the archive. To provide a
smooth upgrade from Woody (and get rid of the ancient software), I ma
Hi,
Still no sponsor.
Anyone?
/Steffen
On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 09:27, Steffen Nissen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am the upstream maintainer (and initial developer of) the Fast
> Artificial Neural Network Library (fann).
> http://fann.sourceforge.net/
>
> I have made two debian packages for the new 1.1.0
Steve Langasek wrote:
IIRC, the --distribution argument only has an effect the first time you
run 'pbuilder create'.
What should I have done instead to ensure the program was being built
against sid, in that case?
On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 12:02:44PM -0600, Benjamin Cutler wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> >No, you also have to be sure that the package that is being uploaded to
> >the archive *was* built on sid, not just that it could have been.
> >For sponsored uploads, this is usually not an issue, since th
Hello,
I'm seeking a sponsor for the package rzip. rzip is very efficient in
compressing large files because it has an effective buffer of 900MB -
bzip2 has one of 32KB. It's slower than bzip2 and cannot be used in a
pipe, but the results are worth it - see the homepage for some
benchmarks.
Her
Steve Langasek wrote:
No, you also have to be sure that the package that is being uploaded to
the archive *was* built on sid, not just that it could have been.
For sponsored uploads, this is usually not an issue, since the sponsor
ought to be doing a rebuild from source before uploading.
Is
Hello mentors,
I need someone to upload a small transitional package for drgenius. This
program has been renamed to drgeo and is already packaged for Sarge.
Unfortunately, the old package is still in the archive. To provide a
smooth upgrade from Woody (and get rid of the ancient software), I ma
On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 07:21:10PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 06:12:52PM -0700, Benjamin Cutler wrote:
> > Just how important is it that a package be created on a box running sid?
> > I'm currently running sarge, and would like to package a program myself
> > instead o
Steve Langasek wrote:
IIRC, the --distribution argument only has an effect the first time you
run 'pbuilder create'.
What should I have done instead to ensure the program was being built
against sid, in that case?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 12:02:44PM -0600, Benjamin Cutler wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> >No, you also have to be sure that the package that is being uploaded to
> >the archive *was* built on sid, not just that it could have been.
> >For sponsored uploads, this is usually not an issue, since th
Steve Langasek wrote:
No, you also have to be sure that the package that is being uploaded to
the archive *was* built on sid, not just that it could have been.
For sponsored uploads, this is usually not an issue, since the sponsor
ought to be doing a rebuild from source before uploading.
Is usi
On Sun, 2004-04-04 at 10:37, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for mp3gain, a program to automatically
> adjust the volume of MP3s without reencoding. AFAIK there is no such
> program in Debian (please correct me if I am wrong). It is a very
> simple one binary package.
Hello.
I'm looking for sponsor for my another package netwag.
Netwag is a graphical frontend for netwox, which is
very powerful network utility combined with many small
"sub-utilities"[1].
Here goes relevant information:
Package name : netwag
Version : 5.12.0
Upstream Author : Laurent Constant
On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 07:21:10PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 06:12:52PM -0700, Benjamin Cutler wrote:
> > Just how important is it that a package be created on a box running sid?
> > I'm currently running sarge, and would like to package a program myself
> > instead o
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for mp3gain, a program to automatically
adjust the volume of MP3s without reencoding. AFAIK there is no such
program in Debian (please correct me if I am wrong). It is a very
simple one binary package.
* Package name: mp3gain
Version : 1.4.3
Upstr
> I am responsible for the package htdig. Htdig is a full-text indexer for
> (local) sites, ie. will generate a full-text (searchable) index of that
> site.
> The thing is written in C++, and comes with loads of libraries. While
> the procedure described in the various manuals (the shlibs syste
On Sun, 2004-04-04 at 10:37, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for mp3gain, a program to automatically
> adjust the volume of MP3s without reencoding. AFAIK there is no such
> program in Debian (please correct me if I am wrong). It is a very
> simple one binary package.
Hello.
I'm looking for sponsor for my another package netwag.
Netwag is a graphical frontend for netwox, which is
very powerful network utility combined with many small
"sub-utilities"[1].
Here goes relevant information:
Package name : netwag
Version : 5.12.0
Upstream Author : Laurent Constant
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for mp3gain, a program to automatically
adjust the volume of MP3s without reencoding. AFAIK there is no such
program in Debian (please correct me if I am wrong). It is a very
simple one binary package.
* Package name: mp3gain
Version : 1.4.3
Upstr
> I am responsible for the package htdig. Htdig is a full-text indexer for
> (local) sites, ie. will generate a full-text (searchable) index of that
> site.
> The thing is written in C++, and comes with loads of libraries. While
> the procedure described in the various manuals (the shlibs syste
Hello,
I am responsible for the package htdig. Htdig is a full-text indexer for
(local) sites, ie. will generate a full-text (searchable) index of that
site.
The thing is written in C++, and comes with loads of libraries. While
the procedure described in the various manuals (the shlibs system)
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 06:12:52PM -0700, Benjamin Cutler wrote:
> Just how important is it that a package be created on a box running sid?
> I'm currently running sarge, and would like to package a program myself
> instead of waiting for somebody else, but I'm not sure I want to start
> running
Hello.
I'm looking for sponsor for my newly created package netwox.
Netwox is very powerful utility combained with many small
"sub-utilities"[1].
Here goes relevant information:
Package name : netwox
Version : 5.12.0
Upstream Author : Laurent Constantin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://www.laur
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 06:12:52PM -0700, Benjamin Cutler wrote:
> Just how important is it that a package be created on a box running sid?
> I'm currently running sarge, and would like to package a program myself
> instead of waiting for somebody else, but I'm not sure I want to start
> running
Benjamin Cutler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just how important is it that a package be created on a box running
> sid?
Very important.
> I'm currently running sarge, and would like to package a program myself
> instead of waiting for somebody else, but I'm not sure I want to start
> running si
Hello,
I am responsible for the package htdig. Htdig is a full-text indexer for
(local) sites, ie. will generate a full-text (searchable) index of that
site.
The thing is written in C++, and comes with loads of libraries. While
the procedure described in the various manuals (the shlibs system)
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 06:12:52PM -0700, Benjamin Cutler wrote:
> Just how important is it that a package be created on a box running sid?
> I'm currently running sarge, and would like to package a program myself
> instead of waiting for somebody else, but I'm not sure I want to start
> running
Hello.
I'm looking for sponsor for my newly created package netwox.
Netwox is very powerful utility combained with many small
"sub-utilities"[1].
Here goes relevant information:
Package name : netwox
Version : 5.12.0
Upstream Author : Laurent Constantin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://www.laur
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 06:12:52PM -0700, Benjamin Cutler wrote:
> Just how important is it that a package be created on a box running sid?
> I'm currently running sarge, and would like to package a program myself
> instead of waiting for somebody else, but I'm not sure I want to start
> running
Benjamin Cutler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just how important is it that a package be created on a box running
> sid?
Very important.
> I'm currently running sarge, and would like to package a program myself
> instead of waiting for somebody else, but I'm not sure I want to start
> running si
44 matches
Mail list logo
