Hello all.
I have simple question which I could not find in the debian policy, maybe
someone could point me out to that section or the right documentation? Or a
explanation would be nice. I'm debianizing a package that I would like to
split up in several parts, the package has a 'backgrounds'
On Mon, 2004-04-05 at 12:24, n.v.t n.v.t wrote:
package-backgrounds
package-icons
package-examples
package-name (which contains all of the above) Should I do this as a
meta-package? How do I create a meta-package?
I don't think you need a meta package. I would do this to allow
flexibility
From: Fabian Fagerholm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: n.v.t n.v.t [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Separating packages.
Date: 05 Apr 2004 13:05:45 +0300
On Mon, 2004-04-05 at 12:24, n.v.t n.v.t wrote:
package-backgrounds
package-icons
package-examples
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 09:24:10AM +, n.v.t n.v.t wrote:
I have simple question which I could not find in the debian policy, maybe
someone could point me out to that section or the right documentation? Or a
explanation would be nice. I'm debianizing a package that I would like to
split
Hello.
Is there any policy describing location of .desktop files?
I've just checked Debian Policy, FHS and Developer's Reference, but
I couldn't find anything related to these files. Maybe I searched
wrongly, then tell me where can I find it.
I tried to check some packages to find how do they
On Mon, 2004-04-05 at 05:53, Rudy Godoy wrote:
Hi, just to announce that TORCS[0] Debian package[1] is ready for testing,
Cool, no more messing with CVS. :)
you can grab it from mentors[2]. There is a i396 package and the sources, if
you are
going to compile it, I encourage you to use
Hello.
I'm looking for sponsor for package otak.
It's a visual interface for commandline programs. It can be used as
abook replacement if you use it with mutt, but it's not limited only to
that application.
Here goes relevant information:
* Package name: otak
Version : 1.3.4
I've got a package of teepeedee[1] shortly arriving in Debian via a sponsor.
It's a small package which contains a Python helper script
'teepeedee-share' to help with a basic configuration. As far as I can tell,
I have the following options:
1. Add a Depends: on Python
2. Remove
From: Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Separating packages.
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 14:31:43 +0200
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 09:24:10AM +, n.v.t n.v.t wrote:
Tom Huckstep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's a small package which contains a Python helper script
'teepeedee-share' to help with a basic configuration. As far as I can tell,
I have the following options:
1. Add a Depends: on Python
2. Remove 'teepeedee-share' from the .deb
3. Put
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2004-04-05 14:40, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
Hello.
Is there any policy describing location of .desktop files?
I've just checked Debian Policy, FHS and Developer's Reference, but
I couldn't find anything related to these files. Maybe I
On Mon, 2004-04-05 at 14:55, n.v.t n.v.t wrote:
What does the ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends} mean? I can't find the
meaning of those in the debian policy either? Why not just put depends of
the splited package in the depends line instead of this?
You can manually enter the dependencies
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 03:43:51PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
1. Add a Depends: on Python
2. Remove 'teepeedee-share' from the .deb
3. Put teepeedee-share in a separate package
4. Replace the 'teepeedee-share' with a shell wrapper, which calls the
script
if Python exists
[...]
I
Hi,
I am applied[1] for a Debian Developer role, but as I see, Front Desk
is stalling; I can't see any progress on applicants who have been
advocated. So I have a couple of questions:
- may I hope that Front Desk will assign an AM to me before Sarge is
released? (IMHO not :( ).
- is it ok that
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 05:17:47PM +0200, GCS wrote:
I am applied[1] for a Debian Developer role, but as I see, Front Desk
is stalling; I can't see any progress on applicants who have been
advocated. So I have a couple of questions:
- may I hope that Front Desk will assign an AM to me before
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 06:11:57PM +0300, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
On Mon, 2004-04-05 at 14:55, n.v.t n.v.t wrote:
What does the ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends} mean? I can't find the
meaning of those in the debian policy either? Why not just put depends of
the splited package in the
Hi,
Update: I've just tested the build on merulo.d.o (ia64), no problem
there.
This is good news. Thanks to you and Aaron for trying this out.
OTOH, you should really fix those warnings (the same ones
you see when compiling on i386).
I fixed the compile warnings. But during debuild,
Hi,
Ok, that seems to be all clear to me, what about the rules file? How do I
separate packages, the example that Andreas Metzler told me to check out,
doesn't clear things entirely. Is this the way we should learn it, by
examples? So I move files into a directory then create a deb out of
On Monday 05 April 2004 14:40, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
Is there any policy describing location of .desktop files?
I've just checked Debian Policy, FHS and Developer's Reference, but
I tried to check some packages to find how do they solve this issue,
but now I'm really confused.
On Monday 05 April 2004 14:31, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 09:24:10AM +, WHAT'SYOURNAME wrote:
I'm debianizing a package that I would like to split up, like:
package-backgrounds
package-icons
package-examples
Why? How big are the components? Would somebdy e.g
* Erik Bourget ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040405 22:48]:
I'm wondering how to build multiple packages from a single source tree,
specifically:
foobar : a daemon nominally called 'foobar'
foobar-run : a daemontools/runit svdir for the daemon
The new-maintainer faq seems to not go into this
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 02:57:14PM -0400, Erik Bourget wrote:
The new-maintainer faq seems to not go into this depth. Can anyone help me
out with this one?
Just have a look to a multi-binary packages. You can find a lot of them around.
Basically you need to distinguish binary-dep and
On Monday 05 April 2004 20:57, Erik Bourget wrote:
I'm wondering how to build multiple packages from a single source
Any specific problems?
Create two trees from debian/rules
(man dpkg-deb ! and related (man deb) !!).
You may want to do this using debhelper scripts (man debhelper, watch
out
Hi folks,
I'd like to upload konversation pretty soon. Matthew Palmer offered back in
December to do uploads, but I think he has become too busy, as I have
received no response to my latest email.
So, if someone here is willing to do a few uploads of this package, please let
me know. The
On Mon, 2004-04-05 at 12:24, n.v.t n.v.t wrote:
package-backgrounds
package-icons
package-examples
package-name (which contains all of the above) Should I do this as a
meta-package? How do I create a meta-package?
I don't think you need a meta package. I would do this to allow
flexibility
From: Fabian Fagerholm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: n.v.t n.v.t [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Separating packages.
Date: 05 Apr 2004 13:05:45 +0300
On Mon, 2004-04-05 at 12:24, n.v.t n.v.t wrote:
package-backgrounds
package-icons
package-examples
package-name (which contains
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 09:24:10AM +, n.v.t n.v.t wrote:
I have simple question which I could not find in the debian policy, maybe
someone could point me out to that section or the right documentation? Or a
explanation would be nice. I'm debianizing a package that I would like to
split
Hello.
Is there any policy describing location of .desktop files?
I've just checked Debian Policy, FHS and Developer's Reference, but
I couldn't find anything related to these files. Maybe I searched
wrongly, then tell me where can I find it.
I tried to check some packages to find how do they
Hello.
I'm looking for sponsor for package otak.
It's a visual interface for commandline programs. It can be used as
abook replacement if you use it with mutt, but it's not limited only to
that application.
Here goes relevant information:
* Package name: otak
Version : 1.3.4
I've got a package of teepeedee[1] shortly arriving in Debian via a sponsor.
It's a small package which contains a Python helper script
'teepeedee-share' to help with a basic configuration. As far as I can tell,
I have the following options:
1. Add a Depends: on Python
2. Remove
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2004-04-05 14:40, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
Hello.
Is there any policy describing location of .desktop files?
I've just checked Debian Policy, FHS and Developer's Reference, but
I couldn't find anything related to these files. Maybe I
On Mon, 2004-04-05 at 14:55, n.v.t n.v.t wrote:
What does the ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends} mean? I can't find the
meaning of those in the debian policy either? Why not just put depends of
the splited package in the depends line instead of this?
You can manually enter the dependencies
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 03:43:51PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
1. Add a Depends: on Python
2. Remove 'teepeedee-share' from the .deb
3. Put teepeedee-share in a separate package
4. Replace the 'teepeedee-share' with a shell wrapper, which calls the script
if Python exists
[...]
I
Hi,
I am applied[1] for a Debian Developer role, but as I see, Front Desk
is stalling; I can't see any progress on applicants who have been
advocated. So I have a couple of questions:
- may I hope that Front Desk will assign an AM to me before Sarge is
released? (IMHO not :( ).
- is it ok that
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 05:17:47PM +0200, GCS wrote:
I am applied[1] for a Debian Developer role, but as I see, Front Desk
is stalling; I can't see any progress on applicants who have been
advocated. So I have a couple of questions:
- may I hope that Front Desk will assign an AM to me before
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 06:11:57PM +0300, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
On Mon, 2004-04-05 at 14:55, n.v.t n.v.t wrote:
What does the ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends} mean? I can't find the
meaning of those in the debian policy either? Why not just put depends of
the splited package in the
Hi,
Update: I've just tested the build on merulo.d.o (ia64), no problem
there.
This is good news. Thanks to you and Aaron for trying this out.
OTOH, you should really fix those warnings (the same ones
you see when compiling on i386).
I fixed the compile warnings. But during debuild,
Hi,
Ok, that seems to be all clear to me, what about the rules file? How do I
separate packages, the example that Andreas Metzler told me to check out,
doesn't clear things entirely. Is this the way we should learn it, by
examples? So I move files into a directory then create a deb out of each
I'm sorry I forgot to give a example , the structure of the packge looks
like this:
dir/icon
dir/backgrounds
dir/examples
They all have a Makefile ofcourse in each directory.
Joe
_
Hotmail en Messenger on the move
On Monday 05 April 2004 14:31, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 09:24:10AM +, WHAT'SYOURNAME wrote:
I'm debianizing a package that I would like to split up, like:
package-backgrounds
package-icons
package-examples
Why? How big are the components? Would somebdy e.g
* Erik Bourget ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040405 22:48]:
I'm wondering how to build multiple packages from a single source tree,
specifically:
foobar : a daemon nominally called 'foobar'
foobar-run : a daemontools/runit svdir for the daemon
The new-maintainer faq seems to not go into this
On Monday 05 April 2004 20:57, Erik Bourget wrote:
I'm wondering how to build multiple packages from a single source
Any specific problems?
Create two trees from debian/rules
(man dpkg-deb ! and related (man deb) !!).
You may want to do this using debhelper scripts (man debhelper, watch
out
Hi folks,
I'd like to upload konversation pretty soon. Matthew Palmer offered back in
December to do uploads, but I think he has become too busy, as I have
received no response to my latest email.
So, if someone here is willing to do a few uploads of this package, please let
me know. The
On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 01:24:59PM +0200, Robert Ribnitz wrote:
I am responsible for the package htdig. Htdig is a full-text indexer for
(local) sites, ie. will generate a full-text (searchable) index of that
site.
The thing is written in C++, and comes with loads of libraries. While
the
44 matches
Mail list logo
