On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 02:25:17PM -0600, Wesley J Landaker wrote:
> On Friday 09 April 2004 2:15 pm, elijah wright wrote:
> > > For the C programming language, this means the following
> > > compilation parameters should be used:
> > >
> > > CC = gcc
> > > CFLAGS = -O
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 02:25:17PM -0600, Wesley J Landaker wrote:
> On Friday 09 April 2004 2:15 pm, elijah wright wrote:
> > > For the C programming language, this means the following
> > > compilation parameters should be used:
> > >
> > > CC = gcc
> > > CFLAGS = -O
> Gianluca Ciarcelluti wrote:
>
>> I tried to install my package with apt-get install mypackage; when I
>> run apt-get update && apt-get upgrade it download and install it
>> againg instead of display the "Already installed package" message.
>
> As Matt Zimmerman suggested, it sounds like your Pack
> Gianluca Ciarcelluti wrote:
>
>> I tried to install my package with apt-get install mypackage; when I
>> run apt-get update && apt-get upgrade it download and install it
>> againg instead of display the "Already installed package" message.
>
> As Matt Zimmerman suggested, it sounds like your Pack
Gianluca Ciarcelluti wrote:
> I tried to install my package with apt-get install mypackage; when I
> run apt-get update && apt-get upgrade it download and install it
> againg instead of display the "Already installed package" message.
As Matt Zimmerman suggested, it sounds like your Packages file
Hi,
I tried to install my package with apt-get install mypackage;
when I run apt-get update && apt-get upgrade it download
and install it againg instead of display the "Already installed
package" message.
Any help to make it work?
Here is my control file:
> ---
Hi!
I'm searching for a sponsor for my ripmime package:
Package name: ripmime
Version : 1.3.1.1
Upstream Author : Paul L Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://www.pldaniels.com/ripmime
License : 3-clause BSD
Description : extracts attachments from mails
ri
Gianluca Ciarcelluti wrote:
> I tried to install my package with apt-get install mypackage; when I
> run apt-get update && apt-get upgrade it download and install it
> againg instead of display the "Already installed package" message.
As Matt Zimmerman suggested, it sounds like your Packages file
Jepri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Benjamin Cutler wrote:
>> Nicolas Kratz wrote:
>>>
>> Point made. While I, personally, don't feel any regret (I've been a
>> Premium Keenspot member for two years, have every Sluggy book). I'll
>> be sticking a splash screen into the next build saying just
>> th
On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 10:18:57AM +0200, Arvind Autar wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-04-06 at 07:42, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 09:24:10AM +, n.v.t n.v.t wrote:
> >
> > > Hello all.
> > >
> > > I have simple question which I could not find in the debian policy, maybe
> > > som
Hi,
I tried to install my package with apt-get install mypackage;
when I run apt-get update && apt-get upgrade it download
and install it againg instead of display the "Already installed
package" message.
Any help to make it work?
Here is my control file:
> ---
* Matt Brubeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote [040409 12:42]:
> I think in most cases it is best if you simply install the files as part
> of package A, regardless of whether B is installed.
>
> For example, look at the packages "msql-server" and "ntpdate". Both of
> these contain support files for t
On Friday 09 April 2004 2:15 pm, elijah wright wrote:
> > For the C programming language, this means the following
> > compilation parameters should be used:
> >
> > CC = gcc
> > CFLAGS = -O2 -g -Wall
> >
> > though -O3 is probably OK in most cases. You should keep th
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 03:15:20PM -0500, elijah wright wrote:
>
> > For the C programming language, this means the following
> > compilation parameters should be used:
> >
> > CC = gcc
> > CFLAGS = -O2 -g -Wall
> >
> > though -O3 is probably OK in most cases. You sh
> For the C programming language, this means the following
> compilation parameters should be used:
>
> CC = gcc
> CFLAGS = -O2 -g -Wall
>
> though -O3 is probably OK in most cases. You should keep the
> optimizations options as conservative as possible, unless you r
Michael Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What is the best way to handle the following situation:
>
> package A (unofficial "beamer" in my case) contains some support
> files for an official package B ("lyx-common"). These support files
> have to be copied into the directory tree of package B
> http://www.cs.colostate.edu/~cutlerbc/stripclub/
My bad, correct url is:
http://www.cs.colostate.edu/~cutler/stripclub/
Brian Nelson wrote:
Oops, I didn't realize you're also the upstream author. That makes the
copyright more OK than I realized. Still, you should include more on
the GPL (versioning, etc.), like in the example in that email.
Fixed, I believe.
Normally you create a package using the curr
Hi!
I'm searching for a sponsor for my ripmime package:
Package name: ripmime
Version : 1.3.1.1
Upstream Author : Paul L Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://www.pldaniels.com/ripmime
License : 3-clause BSD
Description : extracts attachments from mails
ripM
Jepri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Benjamin Cutler wrote:
>> Nicolas Kratz wrote:
>>>
>> Point made. While I, personally, don't feel any regret (I've been a
>> Premium Keenspot member for two years, have every Sluggy book). I'll
>> be sticking a splash screen into the next build saying just
>> th
On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 10:18:57AM +0200, Arvind Autar wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-04-06 at 07:42, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 09:24:10AM +, n.v.t n.v.t wrote:
> >
> > > Hello all.
> > >
> > > I have simple question which I could not find in the debian policy, maybe
> > > som
* Matt Brubeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote [040409 12:42]:
> I think in most cases it is best if you simply install the files as part
> of package A, regardless of whether B is installed.
>
> For example, look at the packages "msql-server" and "ntpdate". Both of
> these contain support files for t
On Friday 09 April 2004 2:15 pm, elijah wright wrote:
> > For the C programming language, this means the following
> > compilation parameters should be used:
> >
> > CC = gcc
> > CFLAGS = -O2 -g -Wall
> >
> > though -O3 is probably OK in most cases. You should keep th
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 03:15:20PM -0500, elijah wright wrote:
>
> > For the C programming language, this means the following
> > compilation parameters should be used:
> >
> > CC = gcc
> > CFLAGS = -O2 -g -Wall
> >
> > though -O3 is probably OK in most cases. You sh
Привет "Debian-mentors"! Как дела?
Предлагаем быстро выучить Разговорный английский язык
Уникальная методика обучения - МЫШЛЕНИЕ, произношение, стиль речи.
Тел.995-8241 Moscow Russia Звоните сейчас! Приходите сегодня!
Наш сайт .amercenterpub.info -start learning english Today!
> For the C programming language, this means the following
> compilation parameters should be used:
>
> CC = gcc
> CFLAGS = -O2 -g -Wall
>
> though -O3 is probably OK in most cases. You should keep the
> optimizations options as conservative as possible, unless you r
Benjamin Cutler wrote:
Jepri wrote:
In Debian, /etc/alternatives/x-www-browser is a link to an installed
browser.
That might not be the users first choice of browser, but that's
another fight for another time.
Alright, that works for Debian, but I'm guessing there's not much of a
standa
Jepri wrote:
In Debian, /etc/alternatives/x-www-browser is a link to an installed
browser.
That might not be the users first choice of browser, but that's
another fight for another time.
Alright, that works for Debian, but I'm guessing there's not much of a
standard Linux-wide?
Привет "Debian-mentors"! Как дела?
Предлагаем быстро выучить Разгорворный английсркий язык
Уникальная методпика обучения - МЫШЛЕНИЕ, произношюение, стиль речи.
Тел.995-8-2-41 Moscow Russiqa Звоните сейчас! Прихкодите сегодня!
Benjamin Cutler wrote:
Nicolas Kratz wrote:
Point made. While I, personally, don't feel any regret (I've been a
Premium Keenspot member for two years, have every Sluggy book). I'll be
sticking a splash screen into the next build saying just that. Perhaps I
should move the "Per-comic donation
* Erik Bourget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote [040409 12:30]:
> I think that this final option is the only sane way. See the following
> scenarios that happen if beamer does install-time detection:
This sounds reasonable for me.
Now I need some starting point how to setup such a "multiple binary
pac
Nicolas Kratz wrote:
Ahem. You DO know that tools like this one are actively damaging online
comic creators?
Most of them are getting a fair share of their revenue from ad sales,
which stripclub, komics etc. pp. are bypassing, or merchandise, which
the user of stripclub will not know about sinc
Michael Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What is the best way to handle the following situation:
>
> package A (unofficial "beamer" in my case) contains some support
> files for an official package B ("lyx-common"). These support files
> have to be copied into the directory tree of package B
> http://www.cs.colostate.edu/~cutlerbc/stripclub/
My bad, correct url is:
http://www.cs.colostate.edu/~cutler/stripclub/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jepri wrote:
I've attached the debug log. In my first mail I was adding the issue
as a footnote to what I thought were the bigger problems. Looks like
this one is the biggie.
Regrettably I can't seem to find my .comic file (I think the download
overwrote it, I called mine 'sluggy' as well)
Brian Nelson wrote:
Oops, I didn't realize you're also the upstream author. That makes the
copyright more OK than I realized. Still, you should include more on
the GPL (versioning, etc.), like in the example in that email.
Fixed, I believe.
Normally you create a package using the current
Benjamin Cutler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Brian Nelson wrote:
>
>>Benjamin Cutler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>
>>
>>>After dinking around with the build tools for a bit, I'm reasonably sure
>>>this is put together correctly, so here goes.
>>>
>>>I'm looking for a sponsor for my package st
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 07:46:51PM -0600, Benjamin Cutler wrote:
> I'm looking for a sponsor for my package stripclub, an online comic
> reader and archiver. It supports the vast majority of webcomics so far
> tested, though a few kinks still exist, mostly dealing with server
> oddities. The pac
Привет "Debian-mentors"! Как дела?
Предлагаем быстро выучить Разговорный английский язык
Уникальная методика обучения - МЫШЛЕНИЕ, произношение, стиль речи.
Тел.995-8241 Moscow Russia Звоните сейчас! Приходите сегодня!
Наш сайт .amercenterpub.info -start learning english Today!
--
To UNSU
Benjamin Cutler wrote:
Jepri wrote:
In Debian, /etc/alternatives/x-www-browser is a link to an installed
browser.
That might not be the users first choice of browser, but that's
another fight for another time.
Alright, that works for Debian, but I'm guessing there's not much of a
standard Lin
Jepri wrote:
In Debian, /etc/alternatives/x-www-browser is a link to an installed
browser.
That might not be the users first choice of browser, but that's
another fight for another time.
Alright, that works for Debian, but I'm guessing there's not much of a
standard Linux-wide?
--
To UNSUBSC
Привет "Debian-mentors"! Как дела?
Предлагаем быстро выучить Разгорворный английсркий язык
Уникальная методпика обучения - МЫШЛЕНИЕ, произношюение, стиль речи.
Тел.995-8-2-41 Moscow Russiqa Звоните сейчас! Прихкодите сегодня!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "un
Benjamin Cutler wrote:
Nicolas Kratz wrote:
Point made. While I, personally, don't feel any regret (I've been a
Premium Keenspot member for two years, have every Sluggy book). I'll be
sticking a splash screen into the next build saying just that. Perhaps I
should move the "Per-comic donation li
* Erik Bourget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote [040409 12:30]:
> I think that this final option is the only sane way. See the following
> scenarios that happen if beamer does install-time detection:
This sounds reasonable for me.
Now I need some starting point how to setup such a "multiple binary
pac
Nicolas Kratz wrote:
Ahem. You DO know that tools like this one are actively damaging online
comic creators?
Most of them are getting a fair share of their revenue from ad sales,
which stripclub, komics etc. pp. are bypassing, or merchandise, which
the user of stripclub will not know about since s
Benjamin Cutler wrote:
Also, the downloading thing is very nice, but it would be nice to also
include the current comics list in case the user can't get through to
sourceforge.
Oops, that's what I get for hitting send too fast.
No worries, same problem on this end.
Another user sent me
Jepri wrote:
I've attached the debug log. In my first mail I was adding the issue
as a footnote to what I thought were the bigger problems. Looks like
this one is the biggie.
Regrettably I can't seem to find my .comic file (I think the download
overwrote it, I called mine 'sluggy' as well)
Benjamin Cutler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Brian Nelson wrote:
>
>>Benjamin Cutler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>
>>
>>>After dinking around with the build tools for a bit, I'm reasonably sure
>>>this is put together correctly, so here goes.
>>>
>>>I'm looking for a sponsor for my package st
1) You could pop up a message box saying "You can now import your
comics from "/home/.../.../whatever". Or even better, you could pop
up the import dialog, already open to the right directory. That would
make it feel a little bit more user-orientated, and people like me
wouldn't get conf
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 07:46:51PM -0600, Benjamin Cutler wrote:
> I'm looking for a sponsor for my package stripclub, an online comic
> reader and archiver. It supports the vast majority of webcomics so far
> tested, though a few kinks still exist, mostly dealing with server
> oddities. The pac
Jepri wrote:
'Kay, couple of points here.
1) You could pop up a message box saying "You can now import your
comics from "/home/.../.../whatever". Or even better, you could pop
up the import dialog, already open to the right directory. That would
make it feel a little bit more user-orient
Benjamin Cutler wrote:
Jepri wrote:
U... your program downloads its comics list and then doesn't
display any of them. When I entered some manually, it was unable to
parse the document correctly becaues it kept interpeting the first
line of the document as the header ( kept saying it coul
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 08:12:02AM -0600, Benjamin Cutler wrote:
> Brian Nelson wrote:
> >Benjamin Cutler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> >* You should change the RFP for stripclub to an ITP (just change the bug
> > title), and then close the bug in the changelog.
> My first attempt to do this
Brian Nelson wrote:
Benjamin Cutler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
After dinking around with the build tools for a bit, I'm reasonably sure
this is put together correctly, so here goes.
I'm looking for a sponsor for my package stripclub, an online comic
reader and archiver. It supports the va
What is the best way to handle the following situation:
package A (unofficial "beamer" in my case) contains some support
files for an official package B ("lyx-common"). These support files have
to be copied into the directory tree of package B.
How can I determine at installation time whether pac
Benjamin Cutler wrote:
Also, the downloading thing is very nice, but it would be nice to also
include the current comics list in case the user can't get through to
sourceforge.
Oops, that's what I get for hitting send too fast.
No worries, same problem on this end.
Another user sent me an e-
Hallo Brian,
* Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-09 13:38]:
[...]
alot of problems :)
> * The md5sums don't match the upstream tarball. It looks like upstream
> distributes the file as a bz2, so the .orig.tar.gz can't match, but
> the .tar file inside should still be identical.
sen
1) You could pop up a message box saying "You can now import your
comics from "/home/.../.../whatever". Or even better, you could pop
up the import dialog, already open to the right directory. That would
make it feel a little bit more user-orientated, and people like me
wouldn't get confuse
Jepri wrote:
'Kay, couple of points here.
1) You could pop up a message box saying "You can now import your
comics from "/home/.../.../whatever". Or even better, you could pop
up the import dialog, already open to the right directory. That would
make it feel a little bit more user-orientate
Benjamin Cutler wrote:
Jepri wrote:
U... your program downloads its comics list and then doesn't
display any of them. When I entered some manually, it was unable to
parse the document correctly becaues it kept interpeting the first
line of the document as the header ( kept saying it couldn
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 08:12:02AM -0600, Benjamin Cutler wrote:
> Brian Nelson wrote:
> >Benjamin Cutler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> >* You should change the RFP for stripclub to an ITP (just change the bug
> > title), and then close the bug in the changelog.
> My first attempt to do this
Brian Nelson wrote:
Benjamin Cutler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
After dinking around with the build tools for a bit, I'm reasonably sure
this is put together correctly, so here goes.
I'm looking for a sponsor for my package stripclub, an online comic
reader and archiver. It supports the vast m
What is the best way to handle the following situation:
package A (unofficial "beamer" in my case) contains some support
files for an official package B ("lyx-common"). These support files have
to be copied into the directory tree of package B.
How can I determine at installation time whether pac
Hallo Brian,
* Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-09 13:38]:
[...]
alot of problems :)
> * The md5sums don't match the upstream tarball. It looks like upstream
> distributes the file as a bz2, so the .orig.tar.gz can't match, but
> the .tar file inside should still be identical.
sen
Hi Martin,
> * Package name: dcc
> Version : 1.2.39
> Upstream Author : "Vernon Schryver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'll take a look at the package.
Please look at #164842 and #199510 and retitle them as ITP. Close both of
them in your changelog, as well :-)
--jochen
Hi Martin,
> * Package name: dcc
> Version : 1.2.39
> Upstream Author : "Vernon Schryver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'll take a look at the package.
Please look at #164842 and #199510 and retitle them as ITP. Close both of
them in your changelog, as well :-)
--jochen
--
To UNSUBSC
Benjamin Cutler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> After dinking around with the build tools for a bit, I'm reasonably sure
> this is put together correctly, so here goes.
>
> I'm looking for a sponsor for my package stripclub, an online comic
> reader and archiver. It supports the vast majority of web
67 matches
Mail list logo
