Upon purging a package, it is expected that all installed data should be
removed. The package "diogenes" installs a MySQL database and a MySQL
user by prompting the user via debconf for the admin user/password.
I want to give users the possibility to remove that database and user
when the package
Hi.
Jeremy Lainé ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I want to give users the possibility to remove that database and user
> when the package is purged. However, this means knowing the MySQL admin
> password at removal time. What is the best way to go as it is probably a
> very bad idea to keep the admin
> A better solution would be detecting whether a password is needed
> (i.e. the debian-sys-maint or whatever the account is called is not
> available) and if so, prompt the user via debconf at purge.
Trying to be guess whether a password is needed seems rather risky as
the database could very well
I created a package for a program i wrote (bbacpi:
http://bbacpi.sourceforge.net). I want to integrete it into the official
debian tree. I was told on #debian to file a ITP bug, and ask on this
mailing list for a sponsor, so that's what i do.
Regards,
Max Lekeux
bbacpi is simple tool for X th
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 12:02:55AM +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> Of course you and Andreas are right. Sorry for my mistake.
> I just hate patching stuff this way and I didn't notice this patch.
>
> I rebuilt it tomorrow to use dpatch stuff.
Nice sentence ;) Very gramatical... seems I h
Hi.
Jeremy Lainé ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > A better solution would be detecting whether a password is needed
> > (i.e. the debian-sys-maint or whatever the account is called is not
> > available) and if so, prompt the user via debconf at purge.
> Trying to be guess whether a password is need
hi,
how have i to deal with bugs in the files in the debian directory of the
package? for expample i found a spelling mistake in the debian/changelog
file of kernel-package.
should i write a personla message to the maintainer of this package so
he can change this in his next package release or shou
Hi.
Nico Golde ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> should i write a personla message to the maintainer of this package so
> he can change this in his next package release or should i write a mail
> to the bts?
Submit a bug of severity minor, that way it sticks around in case the
maintainer forgets.
You m
Nico Golde wrote:
> how have i to deal with bugs in the files in the debian directory of
> the package? for expample i found a spelling mistake in the
> debian/changelog file of kernel-package.
> should i write a personla message to the maintainer of this package so
> he can change this in his nex
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 05:20:39PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> how have i to deal with bugs in the files in the debian directory of the
> package? for expample i found a spelling mistake in the debian/changelog
> file of kernel-package.
> should i write a personla message to the maintainer of this p
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 05:20:39PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> should i write a personla message to the maintainer of this package so
> he can change this in his next package release or should i write a mail
> to the bts?
Although a private mail is likely to achieve the same result I would
sent
And again a question about multiple debs.
I'm trying this:
install: build
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
dh_clean -k
dh_installdirs
# Add here co
Hi.
I've come across a great piece of software and would like to package
it for the Debian system.
Currently, there is a RFP for the package (Bug #227525). How should I
proceed?. Do I directly fill an ITP? Will that remove Bug #227525? Or it
doesn't matter if they co-exist?
Dave
On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 19:35, Matthijs Mohlmann wrote:
> And again a question about multiple debs.
>
> I'm trying this:
>
> install: build
> dh_testdir
> dh_testroot
> dh_clean -k
> dh_installdirs
>
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 08:06:37PM +0200, David López Moreno wrote:
> Currently, there is a RFP for the package (Bug #227525). How should I
> proceed?. Do I directly fill an ITP? Will that remove Bug #227525? Or it
> doesn't matter if they co-exist?
i think the correct way is to retitle the RFP
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 08:20:23PM +0200, Robert Lemmen wrote:
> On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 08:06:37PM +0200, David López Moreno wrote:
> > Currently, there is a RFP for the package (Bug #227525). How should I
> > proceed?. Do I directly fill an ITP? Will that remove Bug #227525? Or it
> > doesn't m
On 2004-05-05 Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 12:02:55AM +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> > Of course you and Andreas are right. Sorry for my mistake.
> > I just hate patching stuff this way and I didn't notice this patch.
> >
> > I rebuilt it
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 07:29:27PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> No, don't change the submitter; change the owner instead. See
> http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ for instructions.
owner makes way more sense. but i think we should definitely write down
these things somewhere. i have been told to ch
On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 19:17, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> [...]
>
> PS: for i in images/*.ppm images/*.pbm; do rm -vf $$i.gz ... hurts my
> eyes. Please quote $$i.gz, ie.: "$$i.gz". ;-)
> PPS: I'd use sind find -print0 ... | xargs -0 rm
Even better, xargs -0r rm. That way, rm won't throw an erro
Robert Lemmen wrote:
> On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 07:29:27PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > No, don't change the submitter; change the owner instead. See
> > http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ for instructions.
>
> owner makes way more sense. but i think we should definitely write
> down these things
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 12:16:40PM -0700, Matt Brubeck wrote:
> > owner makes way more sense. but i think we should definitely write
> > down these things somewhere.
>
> The WNPP page (linked above, and from the Developer's Reference) says:
>
> RFP: If you are going to package this, retitle th
* Robert Lemmen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040505 21:25]:
> On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 07:29:27PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > No, don't change the submitter; change the owner instead. See
> > http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ for instructions.
> owner makes way more sense. but i think we should definite
Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> hi,
> how have i to deal with bugs in the files in the debian directory of the
> package? for expample i found a spelling mistake in the debian/changelog
> file of kernel-package.
> should i write a personla message to the maintainer of this package so
> he
"Adam D. Barratt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 19:17, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> PS: for i in images/*.ppm images/*.pbm; do rm -vf $$i.gz ... hurts my
>> eyes. Please quote $$i.gz, ie.: "$$i.gz". ;-)
>> PPS: I'd use sind find -print0 ... | xargs -0 rm
>
> Ev
Buy your drug of choice, NO prescription required
Today's special: Free overnight Fedex delivery
Vicodin.$2.56/dose
Hydrocodone$2.18/dose
Xanax...$2.51/dose
Valium..$2.63/dose
Phentermine..$0.84/dose
Stock is limit
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 09:31:10PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Robert Lemmen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040505 21:25]:
> > On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 07:29:27PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > No, don't change the submitter; change the owner instead. See
> > > http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ for inst
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 09:26:20PM +0200, Robert Lemmen wrote:
> On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 12:16:40PM -0700, Matt Brubeck wrote:
> > The WNPP page (linked above, and from the Developer's Reference) says:
> >
> > RFP: If you are going to package this, retitle the bug report to
> > replace 'RFP'
On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 12:23:59AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > ok, so we wrote it down and still tell people who ask (like me)
> > different things...
>
> I evidently missed the previous discussion, but I correct misconceptions
> where I can.
no offense meant whatsoever!
cu robert
--
Rober
On Wednesday 05 May 2004 20.20, you wrote:
> On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 08:06:37PM +0200, David LÃpez Moreno wrote:
> > Currently, there is a RFP for the package (Bug #227525). How
...
Hi Robert,
All of your messages I see in this list are reported as having a bad
signature by kmail here.
kmail
Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
>> Seems, that nobody knows exactly?
There's supposed to be a standard location for .desktop files once everyone
switches to the freedesktop.org standard. Unfortunately, I think neither
the GNOME nor the KDE in Debian actually has yet -- but they will in
future.
Th
Arrangement with a sould mate
Make your profile:
http://thesitefordating.com/web/?oc=53034054
The dating web site
created by women
Upon purging a package, it is expected that all installed data should be
removed. The package "diogenes" installs a MySQL database and a MySQL
user by prompting the user via debconf for the admin user/password.
I want to give users the possibility to remove that database and user
when the package
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 12:02:55AM +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> Of course you and Andreas are right. Sorry for my mistake.
> I just hate patching stuff this way and I didn't notice this patch.
>
> I rebuilt it tomorrow to use dpatch stuff.
Nice sentence ;) Very gramatical... seems I h
> A better solution would be detecting whether a password is needed
> (i.e. the debian-sys-maint or whatever the account is called is not
> available) and if so, prompt the user via debconf at purge.
Trying to be guess whether a password is needed seems rather risky as
the database could very well
I created a package for a program i wrote (bbacpi:
http://bbacpi.sourceforge.net). I want to integrete it into the official
debian tree. I was told on #debian to file a ITP bug, and ask on this
mailing list for a sponsor, so that's what i do.
Regards,
Max Lekeux
bbacpi is simple tool for X t
Hi.
Jeremy Lainé ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > A better solution would be detecting whether a password is needed
> > (i.e. the debian-sys-maint or whatever the account is called is not
> > available) and if so, prompt the user via debconf at purge.
> Trying to be guess whether a password is need
Hi.
Jeremy Lainé ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I want to give users the possibility to remove that database and user
> when the package is purged. However, this means knowing the MySQL admin
> password at removal time. What is the best way to go as it is probably a
> very bad idea to keep the admin
hi,
how have i to deal with bugs in the files in the debian directory of the
package? for expample i found a spelling mistake in the debian/changelog
file of kernel-package.
should i write a personla message to the maintainer of this package so
he can change this in his next package release or shou
Hi.
Nico Golde ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> should i write a personla message to the maintainer of this package so
> he can change this in his next package release or should i write a mail
> to the bts?
Submit a bug of severity minor, that way it sticks around in case the
maintainer forgets.
You m
Nico Golde wrote:
> how have i to deal with bugs in the files in the debian directory of
> the package? for expample i found a spelling mistake in the
> debian/changelog file of kernel-package.
> should i write a personla message to the maintainer of this package so
> he can change this in his nex
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 05:20:39PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> how have i to deal with bugs in the files in the debian directory of the
> package? for expample i found a spelling mistake in the debian/changelog
> file of kernel-package.
> should i write a personla message to the maintainer of this p
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 05:20:39PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> should i write a personla message to the maintainer of this package so
> he can change this in his next package release or should i write a mail
> to the bts?
Although a private mail is likely to achieve the same result I would
sent
And again a question about multiple debs.
I'm trying this:
install: build
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
dh_clean -k
dh_installdirs
# Add here co
Hi.
I've come across a great piece of software and would like to package
it for the Debian system.
Currently, there is a RFP for the package (Bug #227525). How should I
proceed?. Do I directly fill an ITP? Will that remove Bug #227525? Or it
doesn't matter if they co-exist?
Dave
On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 19:35, Matthijs Mohlmann wrote:
> And again a question about multiple debs.
>
> I'm trying this:
>
> install: build
> dh_testdir
> dh_testroot
> dh_clean -k
> dh_installdirs
>
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 08:06:37PM +0200, David López Moreno wrote:
> Currently, there is a RFP for the package (Bug #227525). How should I
> proceed?. Do I directly fill an ITP? Will that remove Bug #227525? Or it
> doesn't matter if they co-exist?
i think the correct way is to retitle the RFP
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 08:20:23PM +0200, Robert Lemmen wrote:
> On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 08:06:37PM +0200, David López Moreno wrote:
> > Currently, there is a RFP for the package (Bug #227525). How should I
> > proceed?. Do I directly fill an ITP? Will that remove Bug #227525? Or it
> > doesn't m
On 2004-05-05 Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 12:02:55AM +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> > Of course you and Andreas are right. Sorry for my mistake.
> > I just hate patching stuff this way and I didn't notice this patch.
> >
> > I rebuilt it
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 07:29:27PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> No, don't change the submitter; change the owner instead. See
> http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ for instructions.
owner makes way more sense. but i think we should definitely write down
these things somewhere. i have been told to ch
On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 19:17, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> [...]
>
> PS: for i in images/*.ppm images/*.pbm; do rm -vf $$i.gz ... hurts my
> eyes. Please quote $$i.gz, ie.: "$$i.gz". ;-)
> PPS: I'd use sind find -print0 ... | xargs -0 rm
Even better, xargs -0r rm. That way, rm won't throw an erro
Robert Lemmen wrote:
> On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 07:29:27PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > No, don't change the submitter; change the owner instead. See
> > http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ for instructions.
>
> owner makes way more sense. but i think we should definitely write
> down these things
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 12:16:40PM -0700, Matt Brubeck wrote:
> > owner makes way more sense. but i think we should definitely write
> > down these things somewhere.
>
> The WNPP page (linked above, and from the Developer's Reference) says:
>
> RFP: If you are going to package this, retitle th
* Robert Lemmen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040505 21:25]:
> On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 07:29:27PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > No, don't change the submitter; change the owner instead. See
> > http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ for instructions.
> owner makes way more sense. but i think we should definite
Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> hi,
> how have i to deal with bugs in the files in the debian directory of the
> package? for expample i found a spelling mistake in the debian/changelog
> file of kernel-package.
> should i write a personla message to the maintainer of this package so
> he
"Adam D. Barratt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 19:17, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> PS: for i in images/*.ppm images/*.pbm; do rm -vf $$i.gz ... hurts my
>> eyes. Please quote $$i.gz, ie.: "$$i.gz". ;-)
>> PPS: I'd use sind find -print0 ... | xargs -0 rm
>
> Ev
Buy your drug of choice, NO prescription required
Today's special: Free overnight Fedex delivery
Vicodin.$2.56/dose
Hydrocodone$2.18/dose
Xanax...$2.51/dose
Valium..$2.63/dose
Phentermine..$0.84/dose
Stock is limit
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 09:31:10PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Robert Lemmen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040505 21:25]:
> > On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 07:29:27PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > No, don't change the submitter; change the owner instead. See
> > > http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ for inst
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 09:26:20PM +0200, Robert Lemmen wrote:
> On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 12:16:40PM -0700, Matt Brubeck wrote:
> > The WNPP page (linked above, and from the Developer's Reference) says:
> >
> > RFP: If you are going to package this, retitle the bug report to
> > replace 'RFP'
On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 12:23:59AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > ok, so we wrote it down and still tell people who ask (like me)
> > different things...
>
> I evidently missed the previous discussion, but I correct misconceptions
> where I can.
no offense meant whatsoever!
cu robert
--
Rober
59 matches
Mail list logo
