Some advice for a non-binary package

I have a project that I think would be useful, it uses debian as a base. It doesn't contain any binary code, only python and shell scripts. It's an easy to use cluster installer/maintainer. It excpects a kernel to be there, and I don't mind including one, similar to the system-imager package,

subscribe

pub 1024D/DA025B59 2002-10-29 Aryix [EMAIL PROTECTED] Key fingerprint = 179D F460 E8E2 D6A6 1E3D 1D05 B152 24AE DA02 5B59 sub 1024g/DFD63464 2002-10-29

apt doesn't handle properly the depends field or I'm missing something?

Hi, maybe I'm missing something (so please don't flog me :)) but I think apt doesn't handle properly the Depends field. Here there is an example, gallery depends on: Depends: apache | apache-ssl | apache-perl, ... On my machine I haven't installed any of them, so if I run apt-get it installs

Re: Some advice for a non-binary package

tripping [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: I have a project that I think would be useful, it uses debian as a base. It doesn't contain any binary code, only python and shell scripts. It's an easy to use cluster installer/maintainer. It excpects a kernel to be there, and I don't mind including

Re: apt doesn't handle properly the depends field or I'm missing something?

On 2004-07-24 Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, maybe I'm missing something (so please don't flog me :)) but I think apt doesn't handle properly the Depends field. Here there is an example, gallery depends on: Depends: apache | apache-ssl | apache-perl, ... On my machine I

Re: apt doesn't handle properly the depends field or I'm missing something?

You have replied in private, I hope you won't mind if I answer on the list... Il sab, 2004-07-24 alle 19:36, Nick Lewycky ha scritto: Is this any different from bug 122304? Nick Yep, you are right, I think the bug is the same... But why nobody has yet taken care about it? There is a patch

Re: apt doesn't handle properly the depends field or I'm missing something?

Il sab, 2004-07-24 alle 20:03, Fabio Tranchitella ha scritto: But if I change the order of the packages apt doesn't try to install apache (and this is right, of course) but try to install apache-common and apache-utils... !!! # apt-get install apache2 gallery [ .. snip .. ] The following

Re: apt doesn't handle properly the depends field or I'm missing something?

* Fabio Tranchitella [Sat, 24 Jul 2004 21:08:23 +0200]: Is it possible to specify related alternative dependency? I'm thinking about something like this: Depends: [apache, php4] | [apache2, libapache2-mod-php4] | there was a thread [1] about this in debian-devel last month. [1]

RFS: Folding@home

Package name : folding Version : 4.00 Upstream : http://folding.stanford.edu URL : http://wagon.dhs.org/folding/ Description : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Client (install package) WNPP bug : http://bugs.debian.org/261257 Long description: [EMAIL PROTECTED] performs research by

Re: apt doesn't handle properly the depends field or I'm missing something?

On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 08:03:51PM +0200, Fabio Tranchitella wrote: But why nobody has yet taken care about it? There is a patch which (maybe) fix the bug without any answer from the maintainers. If you are interested in seeing this (minor) bug fixed, helpful actions include: - Applying the

Re: apt doesn't handle properly the depends field or I'm missing something?

On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 09:18:41PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: * Fabio Tranchitella [Sat, 24 Jul 2004 21:08:23 +0200]: Is it possible to specify related alternative dependency? I'm thinking about something like this: Depends: [apache, php4] | [apache2, libapache2-mod-php4] |

Re: apt doesn't handle properly the depends field or I'm missing something?

* Steve Langasek [Sat, 24 Jul 2004 14:29:16 -0700]: On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 09:18:41PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: there was a thread [1] about this in debian-devel last month. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/06/msg00133.html A package depends on apache | apache-ssl |

RFS for python-gd, RTA by its maintainer

Hello to all, The python-gd package has been RFA'ed by its maintainer, Ben Pfaff. I spoke with him about me taking over and he agreed, as long as I find a sponsor (he doesn't have time). Now, I changed the RFA bug (#223755) to ITA, I prepared a new version of the package, solving the one

Wow, I Really Need This! cD3

User ID: 4 drunk Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 17:15:07 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=--87873530057614470287 87873530057614470287 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Debian-laptop-request Why pay more when you can enjoy the

Re: Some advice for a non-binary package

On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 07:37:58PM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote: tripping [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: I have a project that I think would be useful, it uses debian as a base. It doesn't contain any binary code, only python and shell scripts. It's an easy to use cluster installer/maintainer.

Some advice for a non-binary package

I have a project that I think would be useful, it uses debian as a base. It doesn't contain any binary code, only python and shell scripts. It's an easy to use cluster installer/maintainer. It excpects a kernel to be there, and I don't mind including one, similar to the system-imager package,

subscribe

pub 1024D/DA025B59 2002-10-29 Aryix [EMAIL PROTECTED] Key fingerprint = 179D F460 E8E2 D6A6 1E3D 1D05 B152 24AE DA02 5B59 sub 1024g/DFD63464 2002-10-29 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

apt doesn't handle properly the depends field or I'm missing something?

Hi, maybe I'm missing something (so please don't flog me :)) but I think apt doesn't handle properly the Depends field. Here there is an example, gallery depends on: Depends: apache | apache-ssl | apache-perl, ... On my machine I haven't installed any of them, so if I run apt-get it installs

Re: Some advice for a non-binary package

tripping [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: I have a project that I think would be useful, it uses debian as a base. It doesn't contain any binary code, only python and shell scripts. It's an easy to use cluster installer/maintainer. It excpects a kernel to be there, and I don't mind including

Re: apt doesn't handle properly the depends field or I'm missing something?

On 2004-07-24 Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, maybe I'm missing something (so please don't flog me :)) but I think apt doesn't handle properly the Depends field. Here there is an example, gallery depends on: Depends: apache | apache-ssl | apache-perl, ... On my machine I

Re: apt doesn't handle properly the depends field or I'm missing something?

You have replied in private, I hope you won't mind if I answer on the list... Il sab, 2004-07-24 alle 19:36, Nick Lewycky ha scritto: Is this any different from bug 122304? Nick Yep, you are right, I think the bug is the same... But why nobody has yet taken care about it? There is a patch

Re: apt doesn't handle properly the depends field or I'm missing something?

Il sab, 2004-07-24 alle 20:03, Fabio Tranchitella ha scritto: But if I change the order of the packages apt doesn't try to install apache (and this is right, of course) but try to install apache-common and apache-utils... !!! # apt-get install apache2 gallery [ .. snip .. ] The following

Re: apt doesn't handle properly the depends field or I'm missing something?

* Fabio Tranchitella [Sat, 24 Jul 2004 21:08:23 +0200]: Is it possible to specify related alternative dependency? I'm thinking about something like this: Depends: [apache, php4] | [apache2, libapache2-mod-php4] | there was a thread [1] about this in debian-devel last month. [1]

RFS: Folding@home

Package name : folding Version : 4.00 Upstream : http://folding.stanford.edu URL : http://wagon.dhs.org/folding/ Description : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Client (install package) WNPP bug : http://bugs.debian.org/261257 Long description: [EMAIL PROTECTED] performs research by

Re: apt doesn't handle properly the depends field or I'm missing something?

On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 08:03:51PM +0200, Fabio Tranchitella wrote: But why nobody has yet taken care about it? There is a patch which (maybe) fix the bug without any answer from the maintainers. If you are interested in seeing this (minor) bug fixed, helpful actions include: - Applying the

Re: apt doesn't handle properly the depends field or I'm missing something?

On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 09:18:41PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: * Fabio Tranchitella [Sat, 24 Jul 2004 21:08:23 +0200]: Is it possible to specify related alternative dependency? I'm thinking about something like this: Depends: [apache, php4] | [apache2, libapache2-mod-php4] |

Re: apt doesn't handle properly the depends field or I'm missing something?

* Steve Langasek [Sat, 24 Jul 2004 14:29:16 -0700]: On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 09:18:41PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: there was a thread [1] about this in debian-devel last month. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/06/msg00133.html A package depends on apache | apache-ssl |

RFS for python-gd, RTA by its maintainer

Hello to all, The python-gd package has been RFA'ed by its maintainer, Ben Pfaff. I spoke with him about me taking over and he agreed, as long as I find a sponsor (he doesn't have time). Now, I changed the RFA bug (#223755) to ITA, I prepared a new version of the package, solving the one

Wow, I Really Need This! cD3

User ID: 4 drunk Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 17:15:07 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=--87873530057614470287 87873530057614470287 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Debian-laptop-request Why pay more when you can enjoy the

Re: Some advice for a non-binary package

On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 07:37:58PM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote: tripping [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: I have a project that I think would be useful, it uses debian as a base. It doesn't contain any binary code, only python and shell scripts. It's an easy to use cluster installer/maintainer.