Invite

2004-07-27 Thread Benjamin Kern
Hello, Collect $20 to play our online gambling hall, Super Fast payouts Goto: gaming-money.biz in your web browser, at the cashier type in coupon: FR93P 200 Dollars credit on your first deposit Goto: gaming-money.biz in your web browser, at the cashier type in bonus code: FMJKU Allow us to sh

package with more than one license: logwatch

2004-07-27 Thread Willi Mann
Hi! I'm facing a small problem with my package logwatch[0]. Logwatch's licensing file (License) [1] doesn't match the reality in two ways: 1) Logwatch consists of many perl scripts, many of them not written by the maintainer of logwatch (Kirk Bauer), but by various contributors (including me).

Re: package with more than one license: logwatch

2004-07-27 Thread Justin Pryzby
Check out netpbm for a package with many, many licenses. I don't think your case can possibly be worse than that. Anyways, the license file is done in a very systematic way. On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 03:16:53PM +0200, Willi Mann wrote: > Hi! > > I'm facing a small problem with my package logwatch

Re: package with more than one license: logwatch

2004-07-27 Thread Frank Küster
Willi Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: For the general problems associated with different licenses in one package, you might find a look at http://bugs.debian.org/218105 informative. (Although I hope that your package isn't as mixed as ours). > I can think of these solutions for 2: > > - Distribu

Re: RFS: Folding@home

2004-07-27 Thread Frank Küster
Nick Lewycky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > First off, I'd like to thank you for spending the time to construct > this useful analysis! > > Frank Küster wrote: >> Nick Lewycky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: >> >>>Package name : folding >>>Version : 4.00 >>>Upstream : http://folding.stanford

CDBS warning

2004-07-27 Thread Nico Golde
hi, i switched my packages to cdbs and i think it is very good. but i have one problem, in the build process i get this warning: /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/buildcore.mk:59: "DEB_BUILD_MAKE_TARGET is a deprecated variable" /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/buildcore.mk:59: "DEB_CLEAN_MAKE_TARGET is a deprecated

problems with cdbs

2004-07-27 Thread Nico Golde
hi, i change my package gtksee to cdbs and have the problem, that the makefile doesn't uses the $(DESTDIR) variable. Then it tries in make install to install .mo-files in /usr/ instead of $(DESTDIR)/usr without cdbs this is no problem and it installs it correctly. i put two logs of the build proce

Re: CDBS warning

2004-07-27 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Le mardi 27 juillet 2004 à 14:39 +0200, Nico Golde a écrit : > i saw other packages build with cdbs, which had these warning too? > does anyone know, what it is? Hi, No idea on the warning, but afaik they are here for all my packages and I don't have a problem to build them. To be honest I've no

Re: CDBS warning

2004-07-27 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2004-07-27 Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i switched my packages to cdbs and i think it is very good. > but i have one problem, in the build process i get this warning: > /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/buildcore.mk:59: "DEB_BUILD_MAKE_TARGET is a deprecated > variable" [...] http://bugs.debi

Re: problems with cdbs

2004-07-27 Thread Pierre HABOUZIT
please read [1], especialy section called : "Advanced customisation" https://wiki.duckcorp.org/DebianPackagingTutorial_2fCDBS -- Pierre Habouzit http://www.madism.org/ -==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==- gpg : 1024D/A1EE76

Re: problems with cdbs

2004-07-27 Thread Sebastien Bacher
(Sorry for the dup, I've forgotten to include the list on the first reply) Le mardi 27 juillet 2004 à 19:02 +0200, Nico Golde a écrit : > hi, > i change my package gtksee to cdbs and have the problem, that the > makefile doesn't uses the $(DESTDIR) variable. > Then it tries in make install to inst

Re: RFS: Folding@home

2004-07-27 Thread Nick Lewycky
Frank Küster wrote: Nick Lewycky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: Frank Küster wrote: Nick Lewycky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: Package name : folding Version : 4.00 Upstream : http://folding.stanford.edu URL : http://wagon.dhs.org/folding/ Description : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Client (ins

fixing a woody-only bug?

2004-07-27 Thread (mag)
Hi! Please tell me how to fix a woody-only bug. I know that the uploaded version should only contain the fix. I thought that the distribution in changelog should be woody-proposed upgrades. But the upload has been rejected bu Katie: Rejected: Unknown distribution `woody-proposed-updates'. Thank

Re: fixing a woody-only bug?

2004-07-27 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 07:36:43AM +0200, Magosányi Árpád (mag) wrote: > Please tell me how to fix a woody-only bug. I know that the uploaded > version should only contain the fix. I thought that the distribution > in changelog should be woody-proposed upgrades. > But the upload has been rejected b

Re: fixing a woody-only bug?

2004-07-27 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2004-07-28 "Magosányi Árpád (mag)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please tell me how to fix a woody-only bug. I know that the uploaded > version should only contain the fix. I thought that the distribution > in changelog should be woody-proposed upgrades. [...] No, "stable". Afaict from developer

Invite

2004-07-27 Thread Benjamin Kern
Hello, Collect $20 to play our online gambling hall, Super Fast payouts Goto: gaming-money.biz in your web browser, at the cashier type in coupon: FR93P 200 Dollars credit on your first deposit Goto: gaming-money.biz in your web browser, at the cashier type in bonus code: FMJKU Allow us to sh

package with more than one license: logwatch

2004-07-27 Thread Willi Mann
Hi! I'm facing a small problem with my package logwatch[0]. Logwatch's licensing file (License) [1] doesn't match the reality in two ways: 1) Logwatch consists of many perl scripts, many of them not written by the maintainer of logwatch (Kirk Bauer), but by various contributors (including me

Re: package with more than one license: logwatch

2004-07-27 Thread Justin Pryzby
Check out netpbm for a package with many, many licenses. I don't think your case can possibly be worse than that. Anyways, the license file is done in a very systematic way. On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 03:16:53PM +0200, Willi Mann wrote: > Hi! > > I'm facing a small problem with my package logwatch

Re: package with more than one license: logwatch

2004-07-27 Thread Frank Küster
Willi Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: For the general problems associated with different licenses in one package, you might find a look at http://bugs.debian.org/218105 informative. (Although I hope that your package isn't as mixed as ours). > I can think of these solutions for 2: > > - Distribu

Re: RFS: Folding@home

2004-07-27 Thread Frank Küster
Nick Lewycky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > First off, I'd like to thank you for spending the time to construct > this useful analysis! > > Frank Küster wrote: >> Nick Lewycky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: >> >>>Package name : folding >>>Version : 4.00 >>>Upstream : http://folding.stanford

CDBS warning

2004-07-27 Thread Nico Golde
hi, i switched my packages to cdbs and i think it is very good. but i have one problem, in the build process i get this warning: /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/buildcore.mk:59: "DEB_BUILD_MAKE_TARGET is a deprecated variable" /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/buildcore.mk:59: "DEB_CLEAN_MAKE_TARGET is a deprecated

problems with cdbs

2004-07-27 Thread Nico Golde
hi, i change my package gtksee to cdbs and have the problem, that the makefile doesn't uses the $(DESTDIR) variable. Then it tries in make install to install .mo-files in /usr/ instead of $(DESTDIR)/usr without cdbs this is no problem and it installs it correctly. i put two logs of the build proce

Re: CDBS warning

2004-07-27 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Le mardi 27 juillet 2004 à 14:39 +0200, Nico Golde a écrit : > i saw other packages build with cdbs, which had these warning too? > does anyone know, what it is? Hi, No idea on the warning, but afaik they are here for all my packages and I don't have a problem to build them. To be honest I've no

Re: CDBS warning

2004-07-27 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2004-07-27 Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i switched my packages to cdbs and i think it is very good. > but i have one problem, in the build process i get this warning: > /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/buildcore.mk:59: "DEB_BUILD_MAKE_TARGET is a > deprecated variable" [...] http://bugs.debi

Re: problems with cdbs

2004-07-27 Thread Pierre HABOUZIT
please read [1], especialy section called : "Advanced customisation" https://wiki.duckcorp.org/DebianPackagingTutorial_2fCDBS -- Pierre Habouzit http://www.madism.org/ -==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==- gpg : 1024D/A1EE76

Re: problems with cdbs

2004-07-27 Thread Sebastien Bacher
(Sorry for the dup, I've forgotten to include the list on the first reply) Le mardi 27 juillet 2004 à 19:02 +0200, Nico Golde a écrit : > hi, > i change my package gtksee to cdbs and have the problem, that the > makefile doesn't uses the $(DESTDIR) variable. > Then it tries in make install to inst

Re: RFS: Folding@home

2004-07-27 Thread Nick Lewycky
Frank Küster wrote: Nick Lewycky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: Frank Küster wrote: Nick Lewycky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: Package name : folding Version : 4.00 Upstream : http://folding.stanford.edu URL : http://wagon.dhs.org/folding/ Description : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cli