On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 01:48:26AM +0200, Frederik Dannemare wrote:
BTW, what is the deal with motion and 2.6 kernels ? I am under the
understanding that it requires the videoloop or whatever module,
which is not only abandoned upstream, but also not yet ported to 2.6
kernels.
I have
Hi guys, gonna make this quick, as I'm in a public Knoppix box:
I've just finished a very *late* deb of gtklp-0.9u. Nothing really worth
noting, except that it might get into Sarge (but, in all probability, it won't
:()
Here's the signed-changes file:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash:
--
|=-ZAK B. ELEP (Registered Linux User #327585)-=|
|| Web: http://zakame.spunge.org GPG ID: 0xFA53851D ||
|| http://zakame.homelinux.orgICQ UIN: 33236644 ||
|| Location: Daet, Camarines Norte Running Linux 2.6
From now on save up to 82% off
Save on all your RX Medication order directly from our FDA-approved manufacturers
Over 60 products, Save up to 82% on your RX drugs
Type in rx-factory.com into your web browser
No more notifications rx-factory.com/u
Nancy Simmons
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Hi,
when we last had a freeze, I wasn't a DD yet, therefore this was new for
me:
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in debian-devel:
These packages are frozen, i.e. newer uploads to unstable won't go into
testing. The official way is to upload also a package to testing. To upload
a
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 03:28:29PM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote:
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in debian-devel:
These packages are frozen, i.e. newer uploads to unstable won't go into
testing. The official way is to upload also a package to testing. To upload
a package to testing (or:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 03:28:29PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in debian-devel:
These packages are frozen, i.e. newer uploads to unstable won't go
into testing. The official way is to upload also a package to
testing. To upload a package to testing
On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 03:34:57PM -0400, Alexander Baranov wrote:
So, the readline seems to work fine with standard input-output, but somehow
goes wrong when I try to use non-standard stream (dirstream, associated
with a socket in my case)
Can anybody give an advise?
Thanks in advance,
Hi,
this night I made some small bugfixes to the mpg321 code and send it
to Joe Drew, the upstream author and Debian maintainer of mpg321.
Looking at the BTS and the changelogs I came to the thought, that
development on the mpg321 code and package has been dead (except
the 2 NMUs of course) for
On Wed, 2004-08-25 at 17:35, Stephan Beyer wrote:
I hope I don't look like a hijacker and I hope I'm not that monkey
with a tin tool because I didn't wait for a reply :)
You definitely need to wait for a reply for at least a week, then
generally try one last time to contact him. Hijacking it
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 11:35:12PM +0200, Stephan Beyer wrote:
Hi,
this night I made some small bugfixes to the mpg321 code and send it
to Joe Drew, the upstream author and Debian maintainer of mpg321.
Looking at the BTS and the changelogs I came to the thought, that
development on the
Chris Anderson wrote:
You definitely need to wait for a reply for at least a week, then
generally try one last time to contact him. Hijacking it after 1 day
isn't responsible and is sometimes considered rude, not everyone has
access to email 24x7.
I will sponsor in Stephan's NMUs and patches to
Hi,
Chris Anderson wrote:
You definitely need to wait for a reply for at least a week, then
generally try one last time to contact him. Hijacking it after 1 day
isn't responsible and is sometimes considered rude, not everyone has
access to email 24x7.
It *is* rude :) It's just... in my
Joe Drew wrote:
Chris Anderson wrote:
You definitely need to wait for a reply for at least a week, then
generally try one last time to contact him. Hijacking it after 1 day
isn't responsible and is sometimes considered rude, not everyone has
access to email 24x7.
I do agree that not waiting for
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 01:48:26AM +0200, Frederik Dannemare wrote:
BTW, what is the deal with motion and 2.6 kernels ? I am under the
understanding that it requires the videoloop or whatever module,
which is not only abandoned upstream, but also not yet ported to 2.6
kernels.
I have
Hi guys, gonna make this quick, as I'm in a public Knoppix box:
I've just finished a very *late* deb of gtklp-0.9u. Nothing really worth
noting, except that it might get into Sarge (but, in all probability, it won't
:()
Here's the signed-changes file:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash:
--
|=-ZAK B. ELEP (Registered Linux User #327585)-=|
|| Web: http://zakame.spunge.org GPG ID: 0xFA53851D ||
|| http://zakame.homelinux.orgICQ UIN: 33236644 ||
|| Location: Daet, Camarines Norte Running Linux 2.6
Hi,
when we last had a freeze, I wasn't a DD yet, therefore this was new for
me:
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in debian-devel:
These packages are frozen, i.e. newer uploads to unstable won't go into
testing. The official way is to upload also a package to testing. To upload
a
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 03:28:29PM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote:
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in debian-devel:
These packages are frozen, i.e. newer uploads to unstable won't go into
testing. The official way is to upload also a package to testing. To upload
a package to testing (or:
Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[clear explanation]
thanks very much.
Unfortunately, -3sarge1 sorts before -3.1, so if you want as maintainer
to backport a NMU to sarge, you're out of luck for straightforward
solutions.
I'll see that there won't be NMU's to be backported...
On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 03:34:57PM -0400, Alexander Baranov wrote:
So, the readline seems to work fine with standard input-output, but somehow
goes wrong when I try to use non-standard stream (dirstream, associated
with a socket in my case)
Can anybody give an advise?
Thanks in advance,
On Wed, 2004-08-25 at 17:35, Stephan Beyer wrote:
I hope I don't look like a hijacker and I hope I'm not that monkey
with a tin tool because I didn't wait for a reply :)
You definitely need to wait for a reply for at least a week, then
generally try one last time to contact him. Hijacking it
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 11:35:12PM +0200, Stephan Beyer wrote:
Hi,
this night I made some small bugfixes to the mpg321 code and send it
to Joe Drew, the upstream author and Debian maintainer of mpg321.
Looking at the BTS and the changelogs I came to the thought, that
development on the
Chris Anderson wrote:
You definitely need to wait for a reply for at least a week, then
generally try one last time to contact him. Hijacking it after 1 day
isn't responsible and is sometimes considered rude, not everyone has
access to email 24x7.
I will sponsor in Stephan's NMUs and patches
Hi,
Chris Anderson wrote:
You definitely need to wait for a reply for at least a week, then
generally try one last time to contact him. Hijacking it after 1 day
isn't responsible and is sometimes considered rude, not everyone has
access to email 24x7.
It *is* rude :) It's just... in my
Hi,
Please have a look at:
http://noxa.de/~sbeyer/debian/packages/?main,src,mpg321
Is that the sf.net CVS?
yes. Oh, are there other CVS? Any with more recent changes?
Because I'm not a DD, I hope somebody will sponsor it... perhaps Joe
Drew himself :)
I hope so too! I have a
Joe Drew wrote:
Chris Anderson wrote:
You definitely need to wait for a reply for at least a week, then
generally try one last time to contact him. Hijacking it after 1 day
isn't responsible and is sometimes considered rude, not everyone has
access to email 24x7.
I do agree that not
27 matches
Mail list logo
