Hi,
I decided to adopt the package regexx (a C++ wrapper to the GNU regex
functions). It is orphoned last month (#263873), because the original
maintainer is leaving debian.
On close inspcetion of the source package, I found something
interesting. The upstream source code tarball actually
On Sun, Sep 12, 2004 at 12:48:54PM +0100, Qingning Huo wrote:
On close inspcetion of the source package, I found something
interesting. The upstream source code tarball actually contains a copy
of pcre (Perl-compatible regular expression library), but libpcre3 is
already in the deabin
On Sun, Sep 12, 2004 at 12:48:54PM +0100, Qingning Huo wrote:
I think it would be better to use the libpcre3 library, make regexx
easier to maintain, and more up to date. Before I start working on it,
I would like know whether this is the best practice, and whether there
are any pitfalls.
As
Matthew and Jeroen,
Many thanks for your advice. I will take the optimol way to use
libpcre3, and take compatibility into considertation.
Thanks and regards,
Qingning
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Sep 12, 2004 at 02:13:22PM +0100, Qingning Huo wrote:
Many thanks for your advice. I will take the optimol way to use
libpcre3, and take compatibility into considertation.
I also think attempting to use libpcre3 would be a good idea for reasons
mentioned prevously. What would be even
Hi,
I decided to adopt the package regexx (a C++ wrapper to the GNU regex
functions). It is orphoned last month (#263873), because the original
maintainer is leaving debian.
On close inspcetion of the source package, I found something
interesting. The upstream source code tarball actually
On Sun, Sep 12, 2004 at 12:48:54PM +0100, Qingning Huo wrote:
On close inspcetion of the source package, I found something
interesting. The upstream source code tarball actually contains a copy
of pcre (Perl-compatible regular expression library), but libpcre3 is
already in the deabin
On Sun, Sep 12, 2004 at 12:48:54PM +0100, Qingning Huo wrote:
I think it would be better to use the libpcre3 library, make regexx
easier to maintain, and more up to date. Before I start working on it,
I would like know whether this is the best practice, and whether there
are any pitfalls.
As
Matthew and Jeroen,
Many thanks for your advice. I will take the optimol way to use
libpcre3, and take compatibility into considertation.
Thanks and regards,
Qingning
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Sep 12, 2004 at 02:13:22PM +0100, Qingning Huo wrote:
Many thanks for your advice. I will take the optimol way to use
libpcre3, and take compatibility into considertation.
I also think attempting to use libpcre3 would be a good idea for reasons
mentioned prevously. What would be even
10 matches
Mail list logo