Re: pearpc_0.3.1-2_i386.changes UNACCEPT

2004-10-15 Thread Thorsten Gunkel
Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 04:15:40PM -0300, Leo Costela Antunes wrote: >> Rejected: pearpc_0.3.1-2.dsc refers to pearpc_0.3.1.orig.tar.gz,=20 >> but I can't find it in the queue or in the pool. Has it already been discussed that at http://incomi

Re: pearpc_0.3.1-2_i386.changes UNACCEPT

2004-10-15 Thread Thorsten Gunkel
Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 04:15:40PM -0300, Leo Costela Antunes wrote: >> Rejected: pearpc_0.3.1-2.dsc refers to pearpc_0.3.1.orig.tar.gz,=20 >> but I can't find it in the queue or in the pool. Has it already been discussed that at http://incomi

Re: pearpc_0.3.1-2_i386.changes UNACCEPT

2004-10-15 Thread Leo \"Costela\" Antunes
On Sex, 2004-10-15 at 16:29, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote: > > Rejected: pearpc_0.3.1-2.dsc refers to pearpc_0.3.1.orig.tar.gz, > > but I can't find it in the queue or in the pool. > > Are you sure you made your package with the same (md5) orig file as the > previous version? Yes, both -1 and

Re: pearpc_0.3.1-2_i386.changes UNACCEPT

2004-10-15 Thread Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo
On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 04:15:40PM -0300, Leo Costela Antunes wrote: > Hi all > > What can I do about the forwarded problem? > I tried reuploading the files + the orig.tar.gz, but it generated the > same problem. > Any pointers? > > Rejected: pearpc_0.3.1-2.dsc refers to pearpc_0.3.1.orig.tar.gz,

pearpc_0.3.1-2_i386.changes UNACCEPT

2004-10-15 Thread Leo \"Costela\" Antunes
Hi all What can I do about the forwarded problem? I tried reuploading the files + the orig.tar.gz, but it generated the same problem. Any pointers? Cheers and thanks -Forwarded Message- > From: Debian Installer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Leo Costela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Debian Instal

Re: pearpc_0.3.1-2_i386.changes UNACCEPT

2004-10-15 Thread Leo \"Costela\" Antunes
On Sex, 2004-10-15 at 16:29, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote: > > Rejected: pearpc_0.3.1-2.dsc refers to pearpc_0.3.1.orig.tar.gz, > > but I can't find it in the queue or in the pool. > > Are you sure you made your package with the same (md5) orig file as the > previous version? Yes, both -1 and

Re: pearpc_0.3.1-2_i386.changes UNACCEPT

2004-10-15 Thread Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo
On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 04:15:40PM -0300, Leo Costela Antunes wrote: > Hi all > > What can I do about the forwarded problem? > I tried reuploading the files + the orig.tar.gz, but it generated the > same problem. > Any pointers? > > Rejected: pearpc_0.3.1-2.dsc refers to pearpc_0.3.1.orig.tar.gz,

pearpc_0.3.1-2_i386.changes UNACCEPT

2004-10-15 Thread Leo \"Costela\" Antunes
Hi all What can I do about the forwarded problem? I tried reuploading the files + the orig.tar.gz, but it generated the same problem. Any pointers? Cheers and thanks -Forwarded Message- > From: Debian Installer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Leo Costela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Debian Instal

Re: debian applicant

2004-10-15 Thread Guglielmo Dapavo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David Moreno Garza wrote: | On Fri, 2004-10-15 at 15:32 +0200, Guglielmo Dapavo wrote: | |> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 |> |> Hi I'm a Debian applicantt, is there anyone willing to be my |> sponsor, I have already chosen a package t

Re: debian applicant

2004-10-15 Thread Guglielmo Dapavo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Guglielmo Dapavo wrote: | Hi I'm a Debian applicantt, is there anyone willing to be my | sponsor, I have already chosen a package to work with. | | OK, I only wanted to know what I have to do. Thanks - -- Guglielmo Dapavo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE

Re: debian applicant

2004-10-15 Thread David Moreno Garza
On Fri, 2004-10-15 at 15:32 +0200, Guglielmo Dapavo wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi I'm a Debian applicantt, is there anyone willing to be my sponsor, > I have already chosen a package to work with. You ought read something like this, before anything: http://people

Re: debian applicant

2004-10-15 Thread Ricardo Mones
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 15:32:34 +0200 Guglielmo Dapavo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi I'm a Debian applicantt, is there anyone willing to be my sponsor, > I have already chosen a package to work with. The usual way is to work with the package and then post the URL[1] with your packaging efforts,

Re: debian applicant

2004-10-15 Thread Guglielmo Dapavo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David Moreno Garza wrote: | On Fri, 2004-10-15 at 15:32 +0200, Guglielmo Dapavo wrote: | |> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 |> |> Hi I'm a Debian applicantt, is there anyone willing to be my |> sponsor, I have already chosen a package to w

debian applicant

2004-10-15 Thread Guglielmo Dapavo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi I'm a Debian applicantt, is there anyone willing to be my sponsor, I have already chosen a package to work with. Thanks - -- Guglielmo Dapavo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - h

Re: debian applicant

2004-10-15 Thread Guglielmo Dapavo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Guglielmo Dapavo wrote: | Hi I'm a Debian applicantt, is there anyone willing to be my | sponsor, I have already chosen a package to work with. | | OK, I only wanted to know what I have to do. Thanks - -- Guglielmo Dapavo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- V

Re: debian applicant

2004-10-15 Thread David Moreno Garza
On Fri, 2004-10-15 at 15:32 +0200, Guglielmo Dapavo wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi I'm a Debian applicantt, is there anyone willing to be my sponsor, > I have already chosen a package to work with. You ought read something like this, before anything: http://people

Re: debian applicant

2004-10-15 Thread Ricardo Mones
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 15:32:34 +0200 Guglielmo Dapavo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi I'm a Debian applicantt, is there anyone willing to be my sponsor, > I have already chosen a package to work with. The usual way is to work with the package and then post the URL[1] with your packaging efforts,

Re: Where to submit a bug?

2004-10-15 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 03:59:44PM +0200, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote: > Problem: as user of a random package X, I'd need to judge somehow if the > packager works well with upstream or not. The number of 'upstream' tagged > bugs, or untagged upstream bugs, or forwarded bugs etc.

Re: Where to submit a bug?

2004-10-15 Thread Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
On Friday 15 October 2004 01.21, Craig Small wrote: > On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 04:50:22PM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote: > > My experience is that if you can take the time to track down the > > upstream bug tracking system and learn how it is used, it is much > > better (== you get more reactions)

debian applicant

2004-10-15 Thread Guglielmo Dapavo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi I'm a Debian applicantt, is there anyone willing to be my sponsor, I have already chosen a package to work with. Thanks - -- Guglielmo Dapavo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http

Re: transitioning from conffile to ucf

2004-10-15 Thread Vincent Danjean
En réponse à Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Darren Salt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > > > You mean /usr/share/doc/tetex-base/remove-oldmaps :-) > > Err, yes. And it isn't even executable. That way, I hope to make > people think before typing. When I use such a script, I like it prints w

Re: Where to submit a bug?

2004-10-15 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 03:59:44PM +0200, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote: > Problem: as user of a random package X, I'd need to judge somehow if the > packager works well with upstream or not. The number of 'upstream' tagged > bugs, or untagged upstream bugs, or forwarded bugs etc. c

Re: Where to submit a bug?

2004-10-15 Thread Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
On Friday 15 October 2004 01.21, Craig Small wrote: > On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 04:50:22PM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote: > > My experience is that if you can take the time to track down the > > upstream bug tracking system and learn how it is used, it is much > > better (== you get more reactions)

Re: transitioning from conffile to ucf

2004-10-15 Thread Frank Küster
Darren Salt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > I demand that Frank Küster may or may not have written... > > [snip] >> If you happen to have tetex-base installed in sid or sarge and have >> continuously updated since woody, you'll find lots of useless *.map files >> in /etc/texmf/dvips which are no lo

Re: transitioning from conffile to ucf

2004-10-15 Thread Vincent Danjean
En réponse à Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Darren Salt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > > > You mean /usr/share/doc/tetex-base/remove-oldmaps :-) > > Err, yes. And it isn't even executable. That way, I hope to make > people think before typing. When I use such a script, I like it prints w

Re: transitioning from conffile to ucf

2004-10-15 Thread Frank Küster
Darren Salt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > I demand that Frank Küster may or may not have written... > > [snip] >> If you happen to have tetex-base installed in sid or sarge and have >> continuously updated since woody, you'll find lots of useless *.map files >> in /etc/texmf/dvips which are no lo