I would like to maintain the aeromail package that is currently
orphaned. I am not a debian maintainer and therefore am looking for a
sponser.
Regards,
Russell
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 11:19:48AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
#include hallo.h
* martin f krafft [Sun, Oct 17 2004, 10:35:21PM]:
Apart, yes, why not delete dh_* calls?
Because you need to remember them again when you need them or look
around. Okay, it makes no difference when the day ends.
On Tuesday 19 October 2004 13.47, Russell Kliese wrote:
I would like to maintain the aeromail package that is currently
orphaned. I am not a debian maintainer and therefore am looking for a
sponser.
You should start by reading the documentation, if you didn't already:
Hi,
I've prepared a package for gpsd, a GPS (Global Positioning System)
daemon. See [0] for the ITP.
I'm not looking for a sponsor (someone already offered to upload it as
soon it is in good shape), but for opinions. Generally regarding
quality, and a couple of specific questions.
- The package
also sprach Tilman Koschnick [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.10.19.1546 +0200]:
I'm not looking for a sponsor (someone already offered to upload
it as soon it is in good shape), but for opinions. Generally
regarding quality, and a couple of specific questions.
IMHO, nobody should upload a package they
Hello,
I've been having a little problem in debian/control, on a package.
What happen if I have ${shlibs:Depends}, which will be replaced by the
packages needed by the configure script, but I need one of those
packages to be tested against other? Let me explain.
debian/control hardcore: xmms |
also sprach David Moreno Garza [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.10.19.1555 +0200]:
debian/control hardcore: xmms | beep-media-player
What's hardcore?
The shlibs:Depends returns, among others, xmms. But I need to be
compared with another package, as in the first example. In the
case, beep media
On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 16:11 +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach David Moreno Garza [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.10.19.1555 +0200]:
debian/control hardcore: xmms | beep-media-player
What's hardcore?
I meant hardcore for using direct package names, instead what
${shlibs:Depends} yields.
also sprach Tilman Koschnick [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.10.19.1637 +0200]:
I have some experience with shared libs, and some experience with
deb packaging, just not with official packages yet, so they never
had to withstand the scrutiny of debian developers...
I would suggest finding a good
* martin f krafft [Tue, 19 Oct 2004 16:11:34 +0200]:
Do you want your dependency to be satisfyable by either xmms (which
shlibs suggests), or beep-media-player (which shlibs does not
suggest). If so, you are either going to have to provide your own
shlibs.local file and put in an appropriate
Adeodato Simó [u] wrote on 19/10/2004 17:25:
what I was trying to point out on irc was: if ${shlibs:Depends}
expands to xmms, that's because a binary in the package links against
/usr/lib/libxmms.so.1. if you workaround that, you'll end up with a
broken (*) binary in the system.
(*)
#include hallo.h
* David Moreno Garza [Tue, Oct 19 2004, 09:33:52AM]:
Do you want your dependency to be satisfyable by either xmms (which
shlibs suggests), or beep-media-player (which shlibs does not
suggest). If so, you are either going to have to provide your own
shlibs.local file and
Russell Kliese [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I would like to maintain the aeromail package that is currently
orphaned. I am not a debian maintainer and therefore am looking for a
sponser.
I also had a look over aeromail a while ago. (See bug #229960)
Please let me tell my opinion:
Do you really mean
Hi,
I'm building a package, but the makefile needs a commandline argument to
build a particular type of binary. How should I run dh_make etc to do
this?
Cheers,
Ben
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.seigan.org
GPG Fingerprint: 4309 1C58 5143 AFAC F69E 11CD 76FD 56D4 1223 E387
--
To
On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 17:45 +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
I am not sure what you guys are talking about (unless I am completely
confused). shlibs files are for library packages that _provide_
something to link against (SONAMEd shared libraries). shlibs:Depends
gets a list that is created by
also sprach Ben Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.10.20.0016 +0200]:
I'm building a package, but the makefile needs a commandline argument to
build a particular type of binary. How should I run dh_make etc to do
this?
dh_make has nothing to do with Makefiles. I puts a template
debian/rules files in
Ben Hill [u] wrote on 20/10/2004 00:16:
I'm building a package, but the makefile needs a commandline argument to
build a particular type of binary. How should I run dh_make etc to do
this?
?
dh_make only builds a base set of files in debian/
Following that, customization is certainly needed. The
Erik Schanze wrote:
Russell Kliese [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I would like to maintain the aeromail package that is currently
orphaned. I am not a debian maintainer and therefore am looking for a
sponsor.
I also had a look over aeromail a while ago. (See bug #229960)
Please let me tell my
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 08:32:24AM +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
I'm looking for one-time-sponsor for my package asc.
Usually Matthew Palmer uploads asc package for me, but he doesn't respond
for my mails so I'm looking for someone else to upload it this time.
I haven't gotten any
I would like to maintain the aeromail package that is currently
orphaned. I am not a debian maintainer and therefore am looking for a
sponser.
Regards,
Russell
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 11:19:48AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
#include hallo.h
* martin f krafft [Sun, Oct 17 2004, 10:35:21PM]:
Apart, yes, why not delete dh_* calls?
Because you need to remember them again when you need them or look
around. Okay, it makes no difference when the day ends.
On Tuesday 19 October 2004 13.47, Russell Kliese wrote:
I would like to maintain the aeromail package that is currently
orphaned. I am not a debian maintainer and therefore am looking for a
sponser.
You should start by reading the documentation, if you didn't already:
Hi,
I've prepared a package for gpsd, a GPS (Global Positioning System)
daemon. See [0] for the ITP.
I'm not looking for a sponsor (someone already offered to upload it as
soon it is in good shape), but for opinions. Generally regarding
quality, and a couple of specific questions.
- The package
also sprach Tilman Koschnick [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.10.19.1546 +0200]:
I'm not looking for a sponsor (someone already offered to upload
it as soon it is in good shape), but for opinions. Generally
regarding quality, and a couple of specific questions.
IMHO, nobody should upload a package they
Hello,
I've been having a little problem in debian/control, on a package.
What happen if I have ${shlibs:Depends}, which will be replaced by the
packages needed by the configure script, but I need one of those
packages to be tested against other? Let me explain.
debian/control hardcore: xmms |
also sprach David Moreno Garza [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.10.19.1555 +0200]:
debian/control hardcore: xmms | beep-media-player
What's hardcore?
The shlibs:Depends returns, among others, xmms. But I need to be
compared with another package, as in the first example. In the
case, beep media
On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 15:52 +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Tilman Koschnick [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.10.19.1546 +0200]:
I'm not looking for a sponsor (someone already offered to upload
it as soon it is in good shape), but for opinions. Generally
regarding quality, and a couple of
On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 16:11 +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach David Moreno Garza [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.10.19.1555 +0200]:
debian/control hardcore: xmms | beep-media-player
What's hardcore?
I meant hardcore for using direct package names, instead what
${shlibs:Depends} yields.
also sprach Tilman Koschnick [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.10.19.1637 +0200]:
I have some experience with shared libs, and some experience with
deb packaging, just not with official packages yet, so they never
had to withstand the scrutiny of debian developers...
I would suggest finding a good
* martin f krafft [Tue, 19 Oct 2004 16:11:34 +0200]:
Do you want your dependency to be satisfyable by either xmms (which
shlibs suggests), or beep-media-player (which shlibs does not
suggest). If so, you are either going to have to provide your own
shlibs.local file and put in an appropriate
Adeodato Simó [u] wrote on 19/10/2004 17:25:
what I was trying to point out on irc was: if ${shlibs:Depends}
expands to xmms, that's because a binary in the package links against
/usr/lib/libxmms.so.1. if you workaround that, you'll end up with a
broken (*) binary in the system.
#include hallo.h
* David Moreno Garza [Tue, Oct 19 2004, 09:33:52AM]:
Do you want your dependency to be satisfyable by either xmms (which
shlibs suggests), or beep-media-player (which shlibs does not
suggest). If so, you are either going to have to provide your own
shlibs.local file and
Russell Kliese [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I would like to maintain the aeromail package that is currently
orphaned. I am not a debian maintainer and therefore am looking for a
sponser.
I also had a look over aeromail a while ago. (See bug #229960)
Please let me tell my opinion:
Do you really mean
Hi,
I'm building a package, but the makefile needs a commandline argument to
build a particular type of binary. How should I run dh_make etc to do
this?
Cheers,
Ben
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.seigan.org
GPG Fingerprint: 4309 1C58 5143 AFAC F69E 11CD 76FD 56D4 1223 E387
On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 17:45 +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
I am not sure what you guys are talking about (unless I am completely
confused). shlibs files are for library packages that _provide_
something to link against (SONAMEd shared libraries). shlibs:Depends
gets a list that is created by
also sprach Ben Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.10.20.0016 +0200]:
I'm building a package, but the makefile needs a commandline argument to
build a particular type of binary. How should I run dh_make etc to do
this?
dh_make has nothing to do with Makefiles. I puts a template
debian/rules files in
Ben Hill [u] wrote on 20/10/2004 00:16:
I'm building a package, but the makefile needs a commandline argument to
build a particular type of binary. How should I run dh_make etc to do
this?
?
dh_make only builds a base set of files in debian/
Following that, customization is certainly needed.
Erik Schanze wrote:
Russell Kliese [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I would like to maintain the aeromail package that is currently
orphaned. I am not a debian maintainer and therefore am looking for a
sponsor.
I also had a look over aeromail a while ago. (See bug #229960)
Please let me tell my
38 matches
Mail list logo
