also sprach Hubert Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.04.13.0234 +0200]:
It may be of value to users of stable who want to make their own
package of the latest version of the software for some reason.
Then they should bug the maintainer to have it go into unstable.
--
Please do not send copies of
Moin, Michelle...
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 02:13:26AM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
for some hours I have tried to compile a SARGE source under SARGE
with:
8
SARGE base-install
apt-get install build-essential fakeroot
apt-get build-dep
Christoph Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
P.S.: If only I knew a way to use pbuilder with svn-buildpackage. :(
I haven't used svn-buildpackage for some time, but AFAIR,
svn-buildpackage --svn-builder=pdebuild works.
Marc
--
$_=')(hBCdzVnS})3..0}_$;//::niam/s~=)]3[))_$(rellac(=_$({pam(esrever
* Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED] [050413 02:13]:
1) What should I do in such situation?
Write a BUG report against the package ?
Yes, missing build-dependencies (or to be more correct: All FTBFS-bugs
(Fails to build from source)) are Release Critical.
If possible, try the plain
Hello Alexander,
Am 2005-04-13 11:48:53, schrieb Alexander Schmehl:
* Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED] [050413 02:13]:
1) What should I do in such situation?
Write a BUG report against the package ?
Yes, missing build-dependencies (or to be more correct: All FTBFS-bugs
(Fails
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 12:05:37PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Hello Alexander,
Am 2005-04-13 11:48:53, schrieb Alexander Schmehl:
* Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED] [050413 02:13]:
1) What should I do in such situation?
Write a BUG report against the package ?
Yes,
Hello Michael,
Am 2005-04-13 11:29:09, schrieb Michael Koch:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 12:05:37PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Thanks, now I know what FTBFS is. :-)
Only packages are in main with FTBFS are Release Critical. FTPFS in
contrib and non-free are wishlist bugs.
:-)
I am not
Can anybody suggest some good revision control systems for maintaining
Debian packages. I'm about to outgrow using RCS on the debian directory
and wanted to get an idea of what other maintainers are using for their
packages.
Thanks
Jamie
--
GPG/PGP signed mail preferred. No HTML mail. No MS
Re: Jamie Jones in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can anybody suggest some good revision control systems for maintaining
Debian packages. I'm about to outgrow using RCS on the debian directory
and wanted to get an idea of what other maintainers are using for their
packages.
svn-buildpackage.
Christoph
--
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Christoph Berg wrote:
Re: Jamie Jones in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can anybody suggest some good revision control systems for maintaining
Debian packages. I'm about to outgrow using RCS on the debian directory
and wanted to get an idea of what other maintainers are using for
On 4/13/05, martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It may be of value to users of stable who want to make their own
package of the latest version of the software for some reason.
Then they should bug the maintainer to have it go into unstable.
??? Users of __stable__ won't ever get that
Hi ,
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 22:25:43 +0900
Junichi Uekawa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The package files are available from http://www.hemamu.com/hemamu/debian/ .
I've looked at the directory.
I can point out that you have only created a Debian native package,
You will need an
also sprach Jamie Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.04.13.1317 +0200]:
Can anybody suggest some good revision control systems for maintaining
Debian packages. I'm about to outgrow using RCS on the debian directory
and wanted to get an idea of what other maintainers are using for their
packages.
also sprach Margarita Manterola [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.04.13.1359 +0200]:
??? Users of __stable__ won't ever get that piece of software, no
matter if it goes into unstable, testing, or any other distribution
you might make up.
Users of stable can just as well add unstable deb-src links to
On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 08:39 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Christoph Berg wrote:
Re: Jamie Jones in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can anybody suggest some good revision control systems for maintaining
Debian packages. I'm about to outgrow using RCS on the debian
Michelle Konzack wrote:
dpkg-buildpackage ...
8
and now it stops, because missing build dependencies.
Now two quesions:
1) What should I do in such situation?
Write a BUG report against the package ?
Yes, please file a bug
On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 14:31 +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Jamie Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.04.13.1317 +0200]:
Can anybody suggest some good revision control systems for maintaining
Debian packages. I'm about to outgrow using RCS on the debian directory
and wanted to get an
Hi,
Who I am:
A debian user since slink.
Why I post here:
I prefer minimalistic window managers, but would like to have calendar
on desktop nicely integrated with wallpaper - xdkcal just does it.
It had however a nasty bug, that caused it to display wrong month name.
I submitted that bug, but it
Hello, all
Please consult me. A bad checking of unexpected command-line arguments
causing segmentation fault - is that behaviour must be counted as a
grave/normal/minor bug?
--
Regards,
Al Nikolov
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 06:52:37PM +0400, Al Nikolov wrote:
Hello, all
Please consult me. A bad checking of unexpected command-line arguments
causing segmentation fault - is that behaviour must be counted as a
grave/normal/minor bug?
normal/minor, the behaviour is more or less correct
On 13 Apr 2005, at 13:20, Christoph Berg wrote:
Re: Jamie Jones in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can anybody suggest some good revision control systems for maintaining
Debian packages. I'm about to outgrow using RCS on the debian
directory
and wanted to get an idea of what other maintainers are using for
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI a écrit :
What about the case in which the upstream maintainer is the Debian
maintainer? I create packages for a piece of sofware I've written.
That's my case (well...) and I decided to apply the Separation of
Concerns paradigm: software development and packaging are
Hello,
I just added a NEWS.Debian file to one of my packages and the
Developers Reference, (sec. 6.3.4) suggests that one should check the
formatting with dpkg-parsechangelogs.
I read the man page for dpkg-parsechangelogs and played around a
little but it's unclear to me how I can check this
Jereme Corrado wrote:
I just added a NEWS.Debian file to one of my packages and the
Developers Reference, (sec. 6.3.4) suggests that one should check the
formatting with dpkg-parsechangelogs.
I read the man page for dpkg-parsechangelogs and played around a
little but it's unclear to me how
also sprach Jereme Corrado [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.04.13.2026 +0200]:
I just added a NEWS.Debian file to one of my packages and the
Developers Reference, (sec. 6.3.4) suggests that one should check the
formatting with dpkg-parsechangelogs.
dpkg-parsechangelog -l debian/NEWS.Debian
--
Please
I've packaged a tool named ed2k-hash, which is a command-line program
for generating eDonkey-compliant MD4 hashlinks from files. It's quite
useful when scripting any of the already packaged eDonkey clients
(mldonkey for example) and supplements them well. I'm now looking for a
sponsor to help me
Also, the package built is available for download from
http://www.neuro-tech.net/debian/. Thanks again,
Luke Reeves
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 10:10:50AM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
IIRC the problem with 'public domain' is that in some parts of the
world (most of europe certainly, perhaps others) there is no such
concept.
There is a concept of public domain, but it is impossible for the
author to elevate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I recently upgraded the version of a program which has a debian
package, but it's outdated[1][2][3] at this point. My original
sponsor[4] seems unresponsive, I assume he's busy, so I'm requesting
another interim sponsor so that I can get the upgraded
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello
Would anyone like to sponsor the Swedish language/region package for
Mozilla ?
The debian package is just a debianization (largely copied from
mozilla-locale-da) of the xpi package from:
http://www.mozilla.se/
The licence is MPL 1.1/GPL
Am 2005-04-13 08:36:57, schrieb Kevin B. McCarty:
1) What should I do in such situation?
Write a BUG report against the package ?
Yes, please file a bug against the package with severity grave. If
the package can be built on sid, but not on sarge, then also tag the bug
sarge.
Hi,
Thank you for this comment .
I put a necessary file.
Files are availabele at :
http://www.hemamu.com/hemamu/debian/
1.
I think you've misspelt
debian/manpeges should be debian/manpages
2.
Is the priority '50' for x-window-manager alternatives
correct? How did you calculate
Hello mentors!
I intend to adopt the orphaned package 'wpp'. Therefore I'm looking for
a kind DD to sponsor this package. You can find an updated version in
my repository:
deb http://tiborius.net/debian/ binary/
deb-src http://tiborius.net/debian/ source/
Package: wpp
Version: 2.13.1.35
33 matches
Mail list logo
