Hi,
Just wondering if someone would be able to have a look at my package
and point out the holes in it. I'm not really after a sponsored upload
as it's got good enough hosting at the moment. Just want to make sure
the deb's in good working order.
The package is at
http://rubyforge.org/frs/d
Hello David,
* David Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-04-30 11:07]:
> Just wondering if someone would be able to have a look at my package
> and point out the holes in it. I'm not really after a sponsored upload
> as it's got good enough hosting at the moment. Just want to make sure
> the de
On Sat, 30 Apr 2005, Nico Golde wrote:
> Sorry, but we will need the source package to check it.
> Regards Nico
Yeah, that probably would help.
http://rubyforge.org/frs/?group_id=628
Thanks,
David
--
Brevis ipsa vita est et etiam lepti
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
"Carlos Z.F. Liu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> In one of my packages, I relibtoolized it according the method on
> http://people.debian.org/%7Ekeybuk/libtool-updating.html. And then,
> generate a patch called 00_relibtoolize.patch. This patch will replace
> config.guess and config.sub
* David Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050430 19:41]:
> > Sorry, but we will need the source package to check it.
> > Regards Nico
>
> Yeah, that probably would help.
>
> http://rubyforge.org/frs/?group_id=628
Nico probably wants to see the *.dsc and *.diff.gz files
as well.
Best regards - Juerge
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 03:52:21PM +1200, Carlos Z.F. Liu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In one of my packages, I relibtoolized it according the method on
> http://people.debian.org/%7Ekeybuk/libtool-updating.html. And then,
> generate a patch called 00_relibtoolize.patch. This patch will replace
> config.gu
On Sat, 30 Apr 2005, Juergen Salk wrote:
>
> Nico probably wants to see the *.dsc and *.diff.gz files
> as well.
>
There's no diff file as it's a native package (that's right isn't it?).
A dsc should be able to be generated from that tarball, as that's where
the deb's generated from.
Thanks,
* David Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050430 20:25]:
> >
> > Nico probably wants to see the *.dsc and *.diff.gz files
> > as well.
> >
>
> There's no diff file as it's a native package (that's right isn't it?).
Oh, I see. This wasn't obvious to me, because your package has a
Debian revision numbe
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 08:25:57PM +1000, David Clarke wrote:
> > Nico probably wants to see the *.dsc and *.diff.gz files
> > as well.
> >
> There's no diff file as it's a native package (that's right isn't it?).
No that's not right.
You should make .orig.tar.gz file without your debian/* stuf
Hello Juergen,
* Juergen Salk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-04-30 14:15]:
> * David Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050430 19:41]:
>
> > > Sorry, but we will need the source package to check it.
> > > Regards Nico
> >
> > Yeah, that probably would help.
> >
> > http://rubyforge.org/frs/?group_id=628
>
Hello David,
* David Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-04-30 14:15]:
> On Sat, 30 Apr 2005, Juergen Salk wrote:
> >
> > Nico probably wants to see the *.dsc and *.diff.gz files
> > as well.
> >
>
> There's no diff file as it's a native package (that's right isn't it?).
> A dsc should be able to
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 11:54:19AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Read /usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz please.
>
Thanks for the pointer. But it doesn't answer my question.
--
Best Regards,
Carlos
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscrib
On Sat, 30 Apr 2005, Nico Golde wrote:
> No it is defenetly not a native package. This program isn't
> debian specific and its originin isn't debian.
I see, my idea of what made a package native wasn't right. I'll look
into setting it up with the orig source, dsc, and others.
Why is it better to
On Sun, 01 May 2005, Carlos Z.F. Liu wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 11:54:19AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Read /usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz please.
> >
> Thanks for the pointer. But it doesn't answer my question.
I can't really add documentation on autotools-dev abo
"Carlos Z.F. Liu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 11:54:19AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Read /usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz please.
>>
> Thanks for the pointer. But it doesn't answer my question.
That file recommends some best practices.
You have
Hallo David,
* David Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-04-30 14:55]:
> On Sat, 30 Apr 2005, Nico Golde wrote:
> > No it is defenetly not a native package. This program isn't
> > debian specific and its originin isn't debian.
>
> I see, my idea of what made a package native wasn't right. I'll look
Hi David,
On Saturday 30 April 2005 14:46, David Clarke wrote:
> Why is it better to have the debian directory separate to the main
> tarball? I had a read of the thread a little while ago about the
> developers including a debian directory, and am still unsure why this is
> neccessarily a bad t
David Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why is it better to have the debian directory separate to the main
> tarball? I had a read of the thread a little while ago about the
> developers including a debian directory, and am still unsure why this is
> neccessarily a bad thing if the person produ
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 03:40:21PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> That file recommends some best practices.
>
> You have to check what cdbs does (which is copy the autotools-dev
> files iirc) and compare that with what you do and the best practice.
>
> But if I had to recommend something no
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 09:53:42AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> That said, I *really* recommend you to simply use the symlink method
> manually. It is clean, effective, hassle-free and does not bloat the diff or
> require patches. Heck, the only difference is that after you do a
>
Hello i would like to find a nice and friendly sponsor/mentor for my
jatx project.
you can read more information about the project on
http://www.rosiello.net/jatx/
The jatx project is there to help admin (super) users to maintain
process accounting processes on there systems. For example if your
Hello,
I have a question: In which case, a package can go into main or must go
into contrib/non-free is described in the Debian policy. But when do I
need to put the source into contrib/non-free? The situation: I have a
GPL licensed, python based application, which needs python2.3-profiler
(non-fr
On Sat, 30 Apr 2005, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> need to put the source into contrib/non-free? The situation: I have a
> GPL licensed, python based application, which needs python2.3-profiler
> (non-free), so the binary package can't go into main. Therefor i will
> put it into contrib. Do I have to ass
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 08:40:41PM +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a question: In which case, a package can go into main or must go
> into contrib/non-free is described in the Debian policy. But when do I
> need to put the source into contrib/non-free? The situation: I have a
> GP
Am Samstag, den 30.04.2005, 15:56 -0300 schrieb Henrique de Moraes
Holschuh:
> On Sat, 30 Apr 2005, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> > need to put the source into contrib/non-free? The situation: I have a
> > GPL licensed, python based application, which needs python2.3-profiler
> > (non-free), so the binar
On Sat, 30 Apr 2005, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Only that I really understand it: Following your answer, let's say there
> is an application which provides some extra functionality, but these
> extra-functions need a package outside main to compile. The core
> functionality does not need a package out
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 08:40:41PM +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have a question: In which case, a package can go into main or must go
>> into contrib/non-free is described in the Debian policy. But when do I
>> need to put the
Thanks all, I've seen the error of my ways :) . I'll split off the
debian directory.
David
--
Quantitas magna anaticula cumminosa est
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
My name is Julie :)
Most of the time I like to do something I've never done before.. so I decided
to have my first website featuring me (pics and videos). My girlfriends want
to join me to on my website. -) Verify your age and connect to my webcam today
-)
Come I want to share my life experie
29 matches
Mail list logo
