Re: New maintainer checklist

2005-05-09 Thread Andreas Fester
Hi Ben, Ben Finney wrote: Howdy mentors, I'm attempting to start my long slide into package maintainership :-) Welcome :-) I also started this journey some weeks ago, maybe some hints can help you: - In addition to the documents below, reading the New Maintainers Guide:

Re: New maintainer checklist

2005-05-09 Thread Ben Finney
On 09-May-2005, Andreas Fester wrote: Hi Ben, [Andreas and others: please respect my Mail-Followup-To header field when posting a followup to the list.] - In addition to the documents below, reading the New Maintainers Guide: http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/ is a must Forgot that

True Debian spirit

2005-05-09 Thread Ben Finney
On 09-May-2005, martin f krafft wrote: I also encourage you to take a look at guessnet, which is the only autoconfiguration tool in true Debian spirit. Care to elaborate? How does it gain the true Debian spirit that others lack? -- \No one ever went broke underestimating the

Re: New maintainer checklist

2005-05-09 Thread Ben Finney
On 09-May-2005, Ben Finney wrote: On 09-May-2005, Andreas Fester wrote: - You should subscribe to debian-devel; this is where development and packaging issues are discussed At what point is this necessary? I usually read debian-devel by proxy (DWN); it's *way* too high-traffic for me to

Re: True Debian spirit

2005-05-09 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Ben Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.05.09.0905 +0200]: I also encourage you to take a look at guessnet, which is the only autoconfiguration tool in true Debian spirit. Care to elaborate? How does it gain the true Debian spirit that others lack? It integrates with ifupdown

Re: cogito_0.10-1 available

2005-05-09 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Sebastian Kuzminsky] Before 0.10, the upstream installed both the binaries (actually shell scripts) and the shell libraries in /usr/bin. Starting with 0.10, the shell libraries are moved to /usr/lib/cogito. Correct, except that it should be /usr/share/cogito/. Thanks for packaging this.

Re: New maintainer checklist

2005-05-09 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 02:33:27PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote: Howdy mentors, I'm attempting to start my long slide into package maintainership :-) There is a wealth of material available on how to be a Debian package maintainer. I'm trying to find my way through it slowly. Here's what I've

Re: New maintainer checklist

2005-05-09 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Ben Finney [Mon, 09 May 2005 14:33:27 +1000]: What else should I be doing before I embark on getting a package ready? Does an overall checklist like the above already exist, that I should be following? IME, reading bits from d-devel-changes [1] will teach you things you won't learn

asciidoc makes ugly man pags (was: cogito_0.10-1 available)

2005-05-09 Thread Lars Wirzenius
su, 2005-05-08 kello 22:15 -0600, Sebastian Kuzminsky kirjoitti: The only lintian/linda complaints are from missing manpages. Some upstream folks are working on translating the existing docs from .txt to manpages (actually asciidoc), so it'll hopefully get cleaner soon without me lifting a

RFS: celestia - a real-time visual space simulation

2005-05-09 Thread Mathias Weyland
Hello I packaged the current release of celestia (1.3.2). Version 1.3.0 which is in debian is old and has been removed from sarge because of RC bugs. The current version contains loads of new features and closes several bugs and whishlist items. I'm already maintaining the 3ddesktop package,

Re: RFS: celestia - a real-time visual space simulation

2005-05-09 Thread Mathias Weyland
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 04:59:29PM +0200, Mathias Weyland wrote: Hello I packaged the current release of celestia (1.3.2). Version 1.3.0 which is in debian is old and has been removed from sarge because of RC bugs. I forgot to mention that the package has been orphaned, sorry Mathias

Re: New maintainer checklist

2005-05-09 Thread Kevin Coyner
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 01:18:23PM +0200, Adeodato Sim??? wrote.. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-changes As the traffic is obviously too high, I've always had a procmail rule in place that discards uploads of non-installed packages (unless explicitly monitored),

Re: New maintainer checklist

2005-05-09 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Kevin Coyner [Mon, 09 May 2005 12:07:40 -0400]: On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 01:18:23PM +0200, Adeodato Sim??? wrote.. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-changes As the traffic is obviously too high, I've always had a procmail rule in place that discards uploads of

Re: RFS: I'm looking for a sponsor for xlogmaster (an orphaned kackage).

2005-05-09 Thread Patryk Cisek
What's the point of this? For example, why would one want the README to stick around after the package has been removed? (c.f. 10.7.3) Unless the README is actually a configuration file, it should be in /usr/share/doc, perhaps named as README.configuration if there's a different README

Re: cogito_0.10-1 available

2005-05-09 Thread Sebastian Kuzminsky
Peter Samuelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ] [Sebastian Kuzminsky] ] Before 0.10, the upstream installed both the binaries (actually shell ] scripts) and the shell libraries in /usr/bin. Starting with 0.10, ] the shell libraries are moved to /usr/lib/cogito. ] ] Correct, except that it should

RFS: kannel (orphaned)

2005-05-09 Thread Paul Dwerryhouse
Hi all, I've submitted an ITA for kannel and I was hoping that someone might like to sponsor me. Kannel is a WAP/SMS gateway. Mobile phones with WAP capabilities can set their WAP gateway to the IP address of a server running kannel and can then browse WML web pages. Additionally, kannel can be

Re: cogito_0.10-1 available

2005-05-09 Thread Ben Finney
On 09-May-2005, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote: Peter Samuelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ] [Sebastian Kuzminsky] ] the shell libraries are moved to /usr/lib/cogito. ] Correct, except that it should be /usr/share/cogito/. The FHS describes /usr/share as architecture-independent data, and gives