* martin f krafft [Thu, 19 May 2005 07:43:41 +0200]:
> One of the messages which fails to verify is here:
> http://madduck.net/~madduck/scratch/mutt-cirrus-1000-8080-10
% md5sum mutt-cirrus-1000-8080-10
b43c01237c4ec2221ba651da1c0a0d4a mutt-cirrus-1000-8080-10
% mutt -f mutt-cirrus-1000
also sprach Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.19.0137 +0200]:
> Check your side, martin, verified fine here.
also sprach Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.19.0211 +0200]:
> All signatures in this thread so far have verified fine for me.
That's curious. My setup works, and it has
Authentic replica Rolex and other watches for gentlemen
and ladies from just $229
Use this promotional link to get best ever prices:
http://www.keepingtimeinstyle.com
contention ai teat kp sinful uc animosity ye
makeup sq introvert rg [2
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 19 May 2005 00:29:03 +0200, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> said:
> On Wednesday 18 May 2005 08:06, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> I find myself agreeing, except that I feel that way as soon as
>> people get away from tried and tested POSIX commands and
>> dpkg-dev. There are
> "Michael" == Michael K Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> Looks to me like THREAD_LOCAL_ALLOC is the major culprit. May
Michael> I suggest that you try hacking the following lines out of
Michael> configure: in 6.3-1, 3941-3944; or in 6.4-1, 3942-3945. This
Michael> will get you a
On 18-May-2005, François-Denis Gonthier wrote:
> I would like to know what I should do about this email I received
> from the maintainers of a upstream package I would like to package.
The topic of other parties redistributing one's software can be
touchy. Above all, remain polite and calm in your
Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 03:10:24PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>
>>A sponsorship for this package would be much appreciated.
>>
>>Package name: cyrus2courier
>>License: BSD (w/ annoying advertising clause)
>>Description: converts Cyrus mailbox format to Maildi
Greetings DDs,
I am interested in becoming a new DD myself and am in need of
having my gpg key signed. Your addresses are all listed as
being in the Ohio area on the page the Adeodato referred me
to below.
If any or all of you would be willing to meet me to sign my key,
I would appreciate it. I
Hello debian-mentors,
I would like to know what I should do about this email I received from the
maintainers of a upstream package I would like to package.
I understand his reasons for not supporting third-party package. I won't pull
their arms into changing the way they release updates. I ju
Richard A. Hecker wrote:
> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>
>> I am interested in becoming a DD. I have asked for sponsorship
>> for a couple of package I created. chora2, which fulfills an
>> outstanding RFP, was graciously sponsored by Anibal (Thanks,
>> Anibal!). It is now in the NEW queue.
>>
>>
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
I guess that at some point I need to do the identy verification
step. How does that go? Do I locate some DDs near me and drop
them an email and see if they are willing to sign my gpg key?
One of the links I referred to earlier is
http://nm.debian.org/gpg_offer.php an
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
I am interested in becoming a DD. I have asked for sponsorship
for a couple of package I created. chora2, which fulfills an
outstanding RFP, was graciously sponsored by Anibal (Thanks,
Anibal!). It is now in the NEW queue.
My question is what is the next step? I figure
On 19-May-2005, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> Please put the homepage at the end of the description in
> debian/control.
I recall a proposal for a "URL" or "Upstream-URL" or some such field
in the debian/control file. Is it too early to start including such a
field?
--
\ "Rightful l
On 19-May-2005, martin f krafft wrote:
> Among the first steps: make sure you can sign emails properly. Your
> signature failed to verify on all your posts.
All signatures in this thread so far have verified fine for me.
--
\ "Sunday School: A prison in which children do penance for the |
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 03:10:24PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>A sponsorship for this package would be much appreciated.
>
>Package name: cyrus2courier
>License: BSD (w/ annoying advertising clause)
>Description: converts Cyrus mailbox format to Maildir
> cyrus2courier is a nice little tool t
* Roberto C. Sanchez [Wed, 18 May 2005 18:03:23 -0400]:
> I guess that at some point I need to do the identy verification
> step. How does that go? Do I locate some DDs near me and drop
> them an email and see if they are willing to sign my gpg key?
Yes, that's right. You can check http://nm.
* martin f krafft [Thu, 19 May 2005 01:19:02 +0200]:
> Among the first steps: make sure you can sign emails properly. Your
> signature failed to verify on all your posts.
Check your side, martin, verified fine here.
--
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
Listening
Among the first steps: make sure you can sign emails properly. Your
signature failed to verify on all your posts.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author
`. `'`
Giftlist - Rolex Watch
http://tins.ju7.net/rolex/vron/outvoted.html
Madonna prefers Rolex, Cartier and Breitling
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 5/18/05, Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, I'm trying to compare the single-threaded libgc against the stock
> libgc that is in Debian, so for my baseline, I'm not going to do
> anything that Ryan doesn't do in his package (other than, of course,
> static linking, to make the compar
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 08:06, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> I find myself agreeing, except that I feel that way as soon as
> people get away from tried and tested POSIX commands and
> dpkg-dev. There are far more people who are competent with cp,
> install, mv, make, and other common POSIX
> "Michael" == Michael K Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> On 5/18/05, Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The configure flags for compiling libgc are: --disable-threads
>> --disable-shared --enable-cplusplus (obviously with --disable-threads
>> toggled for the different tests
On 18-May-2005, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> I guess that at some point I need to do the identy verification
> step. How does that go? Do I locate some DDs near me and drop
> them an email and see if they are willing to sign my gpg key?
As suggested by the documents you've been reading, your spon
Hello debian-mentors,
I would like to know what I should do about this email I received from the
maintainers of a upstream package I would like to package.
I understand his reasons for not supporting third-party package. I won't pull
their arms into changing the way they release updates. I ju
Hi,
I'm looking for a sponsor for my project, Plash:
Plash (the Principle of Least Authority shell) is a replacement Unix
shell which lets the user run Linux programs with access only to the
files and directories that they need to run.
The syntax is similar to Bash, but with some changes
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> I am interested in becoming a DD. I have asked for sponsorship
> for a couple of package I created. chora2, which fulfills an
> outstanding RFP, was graciously sponsored by Anibal (Thanks,
> Anibal!). It is now in the NEW queue.
>
> My question is what is the next st
I am interested in becoming a DD. I have asked for sponsorship
for a couple of package I created. chora2, which fulfills an
outstanding RFP, was graciously sponsored by Anibal (Thanks,
Anibal!). It is now in the NEW queue.
My question is what is the next step? I figured that this was
probably
On 5/18/05, Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The configure flags for compiling libgc are: --disable-threads
> --disable-shared --enable-cplusplus (obviously with --disable-threads
> toggled for the different tests). I'm also running on a
> single-processor machine.
Not a hyperthreaded Xeo
> "Michael" == Michael K Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> This is going to sound stupid, but have you tried it with
Michael> either glibc 2.3.4 or Ubuntu's modified glibc? ...
No, I haven't. I think I'll wait until it hits sid.
Michael> Just to check: you are using the same comp
Debian Mentors,
I would like to renew my request for sponsorship of the cyrus2courier program
I recently packaged:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2005/05/msg00245.html
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> I prefer to have these command (usually, mv, cp, gzip, etc)
> explicitly present, so one does not have to go looking through the
> library to guess what is being done.
Wow, here it is 2005, a whole 8 years since debhelper was introduced and
Manoj still doesn't k
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> I appreciate the build system for certain red hat and suse packages not
> being arcane and distribution specific when I try and incorporate
> changes made in packages on those distributions, and I tend to return
> the favour.
Grep through the rpm book for all the % co
Autoquote Carran
On 20050517T120701-0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> > Don't do it without the maintainer's go-ahead. The current best
> > practice is to use whatever (non-evil thing that) works for the
> > maintainer.
>
> This "best practice" fails miserably if the maintainer is not alway
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 01:16:02AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> I could, but in charity I shall not, point to cases where the
> helper packages are used as a crutch, with the developer having no
> idea what was going on , and copying rules files around, engaging in
> cargo cult progr
On 20050517T120043-0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> > If I were to receive a bug report, say wishlist severity, containing a
> > patch that rewrites one of my packages' debian/rules to use debhelper, I
> > would be very upset: it would feel like an insult toward my style of
36 matches
Mail list logo
