Re: Request for a sponsor for Felix

2005-05-26 Thread John Skaller
On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 21:33 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 10:44:49AM +1000, John Skaller wrote: > > > > Felix is a 'free for any use' open source advanced > Copyright (C) 2004 John Skaller. > > Felix is Free For Any Use. > > Redistribution and use in source and bina

Re: Request for a sponsor for Felix

2005-05-26 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 10:44:49AM +1000, John Skaller wrote: > > Felix is a 'free for any use' open source advanced License text [0]: Licence Copyright (C) 2004 John Skaller. Felix is Free For Any Use. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without m

Request for a sponsor for Felix

2005-05-26 Thread John Skaller
I am seeking a Debian packager as sponsor for the Felix project, to provide assistance in the packaging task, and register the result with the Debian archives. Felix is a 'free for any use' open source advanced programming language (translator and toolkit) which works like a scripting language bu

Grab any d-v-d. (with any encryption) to you computer.

2005-05-26 Thread Kelly
Blind leading the blind http://www.get4fast.com/ High on the hog Mayhem Forgive your enemies...but REMEMBER THEIR NAMES! Loose Cannon Off The Cuff Diplomacy is the art of saying 'Nice doggie!'... till you can find a rock. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsub

Re: [Help request] packaging pyne 1.0.3 - build problem

2005-05-26 Thread Daniel Leidert
Am Donnerstag, den 26.05.2005, 20:15 +0200 schrieb Andreas Fester: > > [...] > >>RuntimeError: could not open display > >>configure: error: GTK+ version >= (2,0,0) required > >>make: *** [config.status] Error 1 > [...] > > My guess is that you are logged in as a normal user and running debuild as

Re: RFS: usermode - Graphical tools for certain user account management tasks

2005-05-26 Thread Christopher Cramer
>> Presumably it refers to the fact that you do not have to be root to use >> these tools. > >so they are graphical setuid tools??? Not exactly. They use an included setuid program, userhelper, which performs the operations on their behalf. userhelper uses libuser, which would be configured for wh

UNSUBSCRIBE

2005-05-26 Thread Jean-Philippe Provost
  No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.322 / Virus Database: 266.11.17 - Release Date: 2005-05-25

Re: depending on a customized library

2005-05-26 Thread Michael K. Edwards
On 5/26/05, Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My upstream reports that according to his measurements, disabling > THREAD_LOCAL_ALLOC gives only a 5% performance hit instead of 15%. So > it's much closer to the single-threaded case, but is still a bit > slower. Perhaps upstream is on a hype

Re: depending on a customized library

2005-05-26 Thread Hubert Chan
On Thu, 19 May 2005 18:31:16 -0400, Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> "Michael" == Michael K Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Michael> On 5/18/05, Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hubert> Commenting out those lines, and compiling multi-threaded, gives Hubert> performance simila

Re: debian architectures

2005-05-26 Thread Darren Salt
I demand that Mauro Darida may or may not have written... > On Monday 23 May 2005 19:30, Darren Salt wrote: >> RiscStation machine (memory says that they all use the ARM7500FE), I can't >> say the same for the Risc PC kernel - is it built for ARM610, >> ARM700/ARM710 or SA110? (I'd guess SA110.)

Re: [Help request] packaging pyne 1.0.3 - build problem

2005-05-26 Thread Andreas Fester
Hi, [...] RuntimeError: could not open display configure: error: GTK+ version >= (2,0,0) required make: *** [config.status] Error 1 [...] My guess is that you are logged in as a normal user and running debuild as root, am I right? In that case, it appears to be complaining about being unable

Re: RFS: usermode - Graphical tools for certain user account management tasks

2005-05-26 Thread David Weinehall
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 07:37:58PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Christopher Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.26.1943 +0200]: > > Presumably it refers to the fact that you do not have to be root to use > > these tools. > > so they are graphical setuid tools??? If they're designed

Re: RFS: usermode - Graphical tools for certain user account management tasks

2005-05-26 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Christopher Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.26.1943 +0200]: > Presumably it refers to the fact that you do not have to be root to use > these tools. so they are graphical setuid tools??? -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. kraf

Re: RFS: usermode - Graphical tools for certain user account management tasks

2005-05-26 Thread Christopher Cramer
> what does user account management have to do with the name, "usermode"? Presumably it refers to the fact that you do not have to be root to use these tools. -- Christopher Cramer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED

Bro check out this awesome new product

2005-05-26 Thread Clement
Experience more powerful orgasms http://www.toonu.net/ss/ He deserves Paradise who makes his companions laugh. If my film makes one more person miserable, I've done my job. Brevity is the soul of lingerie. Depend not on fortune, but on conduct. I never think of the future -

Re: RFS: esmtp - User configurable relay-only MTA

2005-05-26 Thread Jose Fonseca
Simon and debian-mentors, Thanks Simon, but Anibal Monsalve Salazar had already step in and I forgot to CC debian-mentors. My apologies. Best regards, José Fonseca On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 15:40 +0200, Simon Richter wrote: > Hi, > > > My sponsor for this package so far, Matthias Urlichs, has bee

Re: [Help request] packaging pyne 1.0.3 - build problem

2005-05-26 Thread Lawrence Williams
On May 26, 2005 10:54 am, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Hello, > > I am currently sitting at the last stable pyne version 1.0.3. But I > observe a problem, when I run debuild: > > [..] > CFLAGS="-Wall -g -O2" ./configure --prefix=/usr > checking for python... yes > Checking python version >= 2.2.0... yes

Re: RFS: esmtp - User configurable relay-only MTA

2005-05-26 Thread Simon Richter
Hi, > My sponsor for this package so far, Matthias Urlichs, has been unreachable > for quite some time now. So I'd like for a DD to sponsor this > package (temporarily or not). I'm interested. I hope I can look at the package today, but I cannot promise it ATM. Simon signature.asc Descripti

[Help request] packaging pyne 1.0.3 - build problem

2005-05-26 Thread Daniel Leidert
Hello, I am currently sitting at the last stable pyne version 1.0.3. But I observe a problem, when I run debuild: [..] CFLAGS="-Wall -g -O2" ./configure --prefix=/usr checking for python... yes Checking python version >= 2.2.0... yes (2.3.5) Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 3, i

Get software cds and download under $15-$99

2005-05-26 Thread Francis
75% Off for All New Software. http://xsdfws.she7dral72szpba.harknihark7.com The gem cannot be polished without friction, nor man perfected without trials. How can you govern a country which has 246 varieties of cheese? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "uns

Re: Where should I upload my public key?

2005-05-26 Thread Stuart Yeates
Nigel Jones wrote: > On 26/05/05, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>To do uploads, you need your public GPG key signed by a Debian Developer >>>in the Debian keyring. This means for you to be a Debian Developer >>>yourself, having passed the NM procedure with all its tests and so on.

Re: Where should I upload my public key?

2005-05-26 Thread Anibal Monsalve Salazar
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 08:41:05PM +1200, Nigel Jones wrote: > >Hmmm everywhere I have read over the past few days has implied that >"Your GPG key MUST be signed by a current DD" which actually puts me >off ever considering to become a DD, just maintaining one or two >'sponsored' packages. To get

Re: Where should I upload my public key?

2005-05-26 Thread Luk Claes
On Thu, 26 May 2005, Nigel Jones wrote: > On 26/05/05, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > To do uploads, you need your public GPG key signed by a Debian Developer > > > in the Debian keyring. This means for you to be a Debian Developer > > > yourself, having passed the NM procedure wi

Re: Where should I upload my public key?

2005-05-26 Thread Nigel Jones
On 26/05/05, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > To do uploads, you need your public GPG key signed by a Debian Developer > > in the Debian keyring. This means for you to be a Debian Developer > > yourself, having passed the NM procedure with all its tests and so on. > > Having your key

RFS: qterm(again)

2005-05-26 Thread Li Daobing
Hello, I want to adopt qterm[1], and now I need a sponsor to upload my package. I have uploaded it to http://mentors.debian.net/ , changelog in [2]. lintian and linda almost clean(this package need a manpage, I will add it later). I think pbuilder also is clean, because I have done it on ve

Re: Where should I upload my public key?

2005-05-26 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 09:59:45AM +0200, René van Bevern wrote: > On 26.05.05, Li Daobing wrote: > > Hi, > > > I got an error message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] when I dput > > my qterm package, I think I should upload my public key to somewhere. > > Anyone can tell me where is the place? > To do

Re: Where should I upload my public key?

2005-05-26 Thread Luk Claes
On Thu, 26 May 2005, [iso-8859-15] René van Bevern wrote: > On 26.05.05, Li Daobing wrote: > > Hi, Hi > > I got an error message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] when I dput > > my qterm package, I think I should upload my public key to somewhere. > > Anyone can tell me where is the place? > > To do upl

Re: Where should I upload my public key?

2005-05-26 Thread René van Bevern
On 26.05.05, Li Daobing wrote: Hi, > I got an error message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] when I dput > my qterm package, I think I should upload my public key to somewhere. > Anyone can tell me where is the place? To do uploads, you need your public GPG key signed by a Debian Developer in the Debian

Where should I upload my public key?

2005-05-26 Thread Li Daobing
Hello, I got an error message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] when I dput my qterm package, I think I should upload my public key to somewhere. Anyone can tell me where is the place? Thanks [1] Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP/GnuPG signature check failed on qterm_0.4.0pre2.ds.1-1_i386.changes gpg: Si