RF{S,C}: gtklp 1.0rel+1.0d

2005-06-13 Thread Zak B. Elep
[Cc'ing Andreas Metzler as he was my last sponsor ;)] Hi! I've repackaged gtklp to accomodate the new version 1.0d. There are no bugfixes in this package :( but I've done some changes to debian/rules and /control for proper handling of config.{guess,sub} files. Below is the *signed* .changes fi

Re: RFS: lincity-ng

2005-06-13 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 09:27:30PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > /me wrote: > > Packages and source can be pulled from http://www.tzi.de/~jmm/debian/ > > A fixed source package with the missing build dependency on > libsdl-gfx-1.2.dev has been uploaded. No, it has not... Gruesse, -- Frank

Re: RFS: lincity-ng

2005-06-13 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 09:27:30PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > /me wrote: > > Packages and source can be pulled from http://www.tzi.de/~jmm/debian/ > > A fixed source package with the missing build dependency on > libsdl-gfx-1.2.dev has been uploaded. As I have also sponsored the original

Re: How to cope with bad package

2005-06-13 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 05:56:06AM +1000, John Skaller wrote: > On Sun, 2005-06-12 at 16:18 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > > > > 'Build-Conflict: ocaml (== version) [amd64]' I believe. You just have > > to hope the next upload fixes the problem. > > Here's is a reason to switch to Ocaml

Re: Build-Depend on virtual packages

2005-06-13 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 05:43:50PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 01:51:23AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 10:15:30AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > > [ Mail-Followup-To: set to debian-mentors only ] > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 09:57:25AM +02

Re: How to cope with bad package

2005-06-13 Thread John Skaller
On Sun, 2005-06-12 at 16:18 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > 'Build-Conflict: ocaml (== version) [amd64]' I believe. You just have > to hope the next upload fixes the problem. Here's is a reason to switch to Ocaml as a programming language: copied from the ocaml mailing list:

Re: -dev library package naming

2005-06-13 Thread Philipp Kern
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 13.06.2005, at 22:36, martin f krafft wrote: A package that installs /usr/lib/libspf-1.0.so.0.0.0 should be names libspf-1.0-0 from all I can tell. The policy does not dictate how the -dev (and -doc) package should be named. I would prefer not to

Re: RFS: lincity-ng

2005-06-13 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
/me wrote: > Packages and source can be pulled from http://www.tzi.de/~jmm/debian/ A fixed source package with the missing build dependency on libsdl-gfx-1.2.dev has been uploaded. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co

-dev library package naming

2005-06-13 Thread martin f krafft
A package that installs /usr/lib/libspf-1.0.so.0.0.0 should be names libspf-1.0-0 from all I can tell. The policy does not dictate how the -dev (and -doc) package should be named. I would prefer not to call it libspf-dev but rather encode the version. The library packaging guide says I should incl

Re: namespace conflict != package Conflict?

2005-06-13 Thread Sebastian Kuzminsky
Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12-Jun-05, 02:27 (CDT), Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >From my reading of your package description for cogito, > > the name GIT (the version control system) doesn't seem to > > mean anything in particular. So renaming it would not be

RFS: libjabber-ruby

2005-06-13 Thread Idan Sofer
ITP: http://bugs.debian.org/207636 Repository: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libjabber-ruby/ libjabber-ruby provides a client-side implemetation of the jabber protocol for the Ruby programming language. It is the debianized name for jabber4r package: http://rubyforge.org/proj

RFS: gcjlib-anttasks

2005-06-13 Thread Idan Sofer
I'm looking a sponser for gcjlib-anttask ITP: http://bugs.debian.org/310962 Repository: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gcjlib-anttasks/ gcjlib-anttask is the (proposed?) debianized name for gcjlib by Anthony Green: http://spindazzle.org/gcjlib/ gcjlib-anttask is an extension

Re: namespace conflict != package Conflict?

2005-06-13 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 09:46:27AM -0600, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote: > Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 12-Jun-05, 02:27 (CDT), Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >From my reading of your package description for cogito, > > > the name GIT (the version control system)

Re: Build-Recommends

2005-06-13 Thread Sven Luther
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 03:21:54PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: > [People from debian-ocaml-mail, please keep -mentors CC'ed.] > > * John Skaller [Sun, 12 Jun 2005 16:27:21 +1000]: > > I could use a 'build-recommends' dependency, > > but I understand 'recommends' > > is only available for the b

Re: Build-Depend on virtual packages

2005-06-13 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 12:40:51PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 10:15:30AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > >> [ Mail-Followup-To: set to debian-mentors only ] > > > >> On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 09:57:25AM +0200, Gosw

Re: Build-Depend on virtual packages

2005-06-13 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 01:51:23AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 10:15:30AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > [ Mail-Followup-To: set to debian-mentors only ] > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 09:57:25AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > > You can't Build-Depend on vir

Re: Build-Recommends

2005-06-13 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 09:57:25AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > If you want to say in your package control file to depend > > on the fastest available compiler on any architecture then > > your should depend on "ocaml-best-compilers" which is

Re: Build-Recommends

2005-06-13 Thread Sven Luther
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 03:21:54PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: > [People from debian-ocaml-mail, please keep -mentors CC'ed.] > > * John Skaller [Sun, 12 Jun 2005 16:27:21 +1000]: > > I could use a 'build-recommends' dependency, > > but I understand 'recommends' > > is only available for the b

Re: namespace conflict != package Conflict?

2005-06-13 Thread Steve Greenland
On 12-Jun-05, 02:27 (CDT), Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You need to convince either git or GNU Interactive Tools > to change its name upstream then. Since git is the newcomer > and its name is already taken (by a GNU project no less!) > perhaps you could start there. The existen

All software - duty-free prices

2005-06-13 Thread Gertie
Microsoft and IBM OEM Software for Bundling Only and other related software. http://jdgr.kroh5j2dhc29zlk.homohedralhj.com Supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy's resistance without fighting. I would rather be right and die than be wrong and kill. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: Build-Depend on virtual packages

2005-06-13 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 12:40:51PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > apt-get complains if there is more than one source of the provides > (even two sources with the same name/version). sbuild then picks the > first choice apt lists for the provides which is non deterministic and > strongly disco

Re: Build-Depend on virtual packages

2005-06-13 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 10:15:30AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: >> [ Mail-Followup-To: set to debian-mentors only ] > >> On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 09:57:25AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> > You can't Build-Depend on virtual packages. > >> Ok,

Re: Build-Depend on virtual packages

2005-06-13 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 10:15:30AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > [ Mail-Followup-To: set to debian-mentors only ] > On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 09:57:25AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > You can't Build-Depend on virtual packages. > Ok, time to settle down this issue. > We do, all ocaml

Build-Depend on virtual packages

2005-06-13 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
[ Mail-Followup-To: set to debian-mentors only ] On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 09:57:25AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > You can't Build-Depend on virtual packages. Ok, time to settle down this issue. We do, all ocaml packages build depends on ocaml-3.08.3 a virtual package provided by ocaml. Wh

Re: Build-Recommends

2005-06-13 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If you want to say in your package control file to depend > on the fastest available compiler on any architecture then > your should depend on "ocaml-best-compilers" which is a virtual > package provided by "ocaml-best-compilers" on architectures You can

Re: RFS: Sponsor needed for em-panel-applet

2005-06-13 Thread Søren Hansen
søn, 12 06 2005 kl. 15:08 +0200, skrev Sven Mueller: > >>- The license is GPL, the copyright is "Copyright 2005 Novell, Inc.", > >> you said the opposite. > > Not understood. Miguel wrote it, passed the copyright to Novell and the > > license is GPL. What am I doing wrong then? > The way you fill