On 5.07.05, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> %.o : %.c
> $(CC) $(FLAGS) -c $< -o $@
>
> To produce both static and shared libraries, I need two such rules. Can
> someone tell me how to do that?
You can use an additional suffix .lo (or anything else) for pic-enabled
objects:
%.lo : %.c
Dear Jarle:
I suggest you look into apt-move, apt-ftparchive or dpkg-scanpackages.
The former will help maintain a tree sucha as in the main Debian archive.
The other two will work on whatever tree organization you might want to
set up for yourself.
I also suggest that you build using pbuil
Hi,
I'm about to make some .deb packages. Some will hopefully be accepted as
official packages, while others will be built for my own convenience (to
ease installation and upgrades on Debian servers I maintain).
The packages includes shared C++ libraries, binaries, databases (MySQL)
and some Java
Hi, I'm seeking a sponsor for Felix (I am
both the packager and upstream author):
* Package Name : felix
Version: 1.1.0
Upstream Author: john skaller<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL: http://felix.sourceforge.net
* License: BSD
* Description: high performance statica
On Wednesday 06 July 2005 01:26, Tom Allison wrote:
> I've been sitting on the list for a while now and am interested in
> creating a series of deb packages for perl modules. But I think I need
> a mentor to introduce me to how things work and what my first reading
> list or RTFM should be.
>
Justin Pryzby wrote:
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 12:54:11PM -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
I am thinking of packaging fortranposix library. The upstream provides a
makefile which creates only the shared library. Now my question is
1) Should I edit the make file to create a static library as
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 12:54:11PM -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> I am reading
> http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/libpkg-guide.html#staticonlylibs
>
> in order to package a library. That document suggests to provide both
> static and shared library packages.
Yes; the st
I am reading
http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/libpkg-guide.html#staticonlylibs
in order to package a library. That document suggests to provide both
static and shared library packages.
I am thinking of packaging fortranposix library. The upstream provides a
makefile which
Mit WEB.DE FreePhone mit hoechster Qualitaet ab 0 Ct./Min. weltweit telefonieren! http://freephone.web.de/?mc=021201
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi again,
Few months ago, I packaged connect-proxy, fixed bugs, did the submission
tasks and contacted the putty maintainers (putty refers to it).
But I am still looking for a sponsor.
Now, what can I do to find someone to upload this 'connect-proxy' package ?
* deb : http://rzr.online.fr/docs
On Tuesday, July 05, 2005 11:21 AM, John Hendrickson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> W: xdm-options: packages-installs-file-to-usr-x11r6
> usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xdm-option
>
> Is this informational or am I supposed to somehow register this so
> lintian won't complain?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ echo 'W: xdm-o
Your message to the list scoug-general has been rejected.
You are not a member of the list. For help on subscribing to
the list, please send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "help" in the body of the message.
Your humble mailing list software,
Steward
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
W: xdm-options: packages-installs-file-to-usr-x11r6
usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xdm-option
Is this informational or am I supposed to somehow register this so lintian
won't complain?
Thanks,
John
Background info, if you care:
xdm-options is better than GDM for intended audience.
ht
13 matches
Mail list logo
