Hi, Kumar...
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 08:54:06AM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
Goopy (http://goog-goopy.sf.net) is a Python module for functional
programming released by Google. It has a few pure Python functions,
and is quite small. It is released under the BSD License.
I have carefully read
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 02:16:27PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
Hi, Kumar...
Thanks for your contribution. Please allow me to comment on your
package:
First, many thanks for the patient review.
- the upstream tarball (orig.tar.gz) on your web server seems
to be incomplete (just contains
Kumar Appaiah wrote:
- since python2.4 is out you may consider creating a second binary
package (hint: debian/control) python2.4-goopy
Done, though I didn't actually get your hint.
You're only supposed to have a single source package generating the
appropriate binary packages.
Kind regards
T.
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 04:44:24PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
You're only supposed to have a single source package generating the
appropriate binary packages.
Then I have done the right thing; I used the same sources to compile
modules for python2.3 as well as python2.4.
Kumae
--
Kumar
Kumar Appaiah wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 04:44:24PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
You're only supposed to have a single source package generating the
appropriate binary packages.
Then I have done the right thing; I used the same sources to compile
modules for python2.3 as well as
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 08:01:54PM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 02:16:27PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
- the debian/docs contains two files that are not very helpful for the
user. The instructions on installing the package are in fact
misleading.
I have edited
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 03:01:40PM +0100, Mark Seaborn wrote:
I'm looking for a sponsor for putting Plash into Debian.
The main page is: http://plash.beasts.org
and Debian packages are at:
Seeing the sad state of vrms right now is something that bothers me.
Some time ago, right before the release of sarge, I took some time to
see if I could fix some of the bugs.
Actually, I discussed this with the maintainers and part what we
discussed is here
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 05:22:15PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
Kumar Appaiah wrote:
You're not using a *single* source *package* to generate the binary
packages, though.
Note that multiple binary packages is territory difficult enough for
the NM guide to discourage for beginners. If you
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 08:51:43PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
I have edited it, and added a message saying Debian users have it
installed already.
That's self-explaining in my opinion. After all that's why a user will
have installed your package. :)
Thomas is right that it's not
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 10:29:37PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 07:40:35AM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
1.docs: Upstream claims that they have docs, but there aren't
any. Anyway, the source is well commented. What should I do with the
README and PKG-INFO?
11 matches
Mail list logo
