On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 01:04:40AM +1000, skaller wrote:
On Sat, 2005-09-03 at 04:19 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
At the present time and given the current state of the software I
believe it is not in Debian's best interest that you ship a .pc file *at
all* upstream
Interesting. Hmm. Can
On Sunday 04 September 2005 7:13 am, Steve Langasek wrote:
pkg-config and libtool are both tools designed to facilitate portability
to platforms which have inferior linkers, and in the process they
duplicate information already provided by ELF libraries on GNU/Linux in
a manner that makes
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 08:52:53AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
On Sunday 04 September 2005 7:13 am, Steve Langasek wrote:
pkg-config and libtool are both tools designed to facilitate portability
to platforms which have inferior linkers, and in the process they
duplicate information already
On Sat, 2005-09-03 at 23:13 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 01:04:40AM +1000, skaller wrote:
On Sat, 2005-09-03 at 04:19 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
At the present time and given the current state of the software I
believe it is not in Debian's best interest that
On Sun, 2005-09-04 at 01:25 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
I don't mind making a special case for GNU/Linux but not if that
actually only includes Debian.
Er, there's nothing Debian-specific about the rationale, and nothing in
this that would penalize users of Fedora or other GNU/Linux
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 08:52:53AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
Once libtool 1.6 is in unstable rather than experimental, then I can use that
- but that won't help that much because the target platform for most of my
code is still FC3 (not my decision). I don't mind making a special case for
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 08:06:07PM +1000, skaller wrote:
Reading your excellent article, you explain this
(excuse me duplicating text from your article):
* Glibc[] support[s] transitive dependencies ..
which if I understand correctly: supposed executable E required
library A, and library A
On Sat, 03 Sep 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
#: mmainwindow.cpp:625
msgid 5 minutes warning
msgstr 5 minutos aguardando
- aguardando means waiting, not warning
Oh dear. And people ask me why I refuse to have LC_MESSAGES set to pt_BR,
even though it is my native language. I would send a lot of
On Sun, 2005-09-04 at 04:08 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 08:06:07PM +1000, skaller wrote:
The second part,
MIT_KRB5_17 {
global:
*;
}
specifies a symbol version to apply to all other exported symbols.
What is the effect of applying a symbol version?
Le Dimanche 4 Septembre 2005 06:52, Steve Langasek a écrit :
I've looked over the package update, and for the most part it looks ok,
but the new Portuguese translation that upstream included is quite buggy
and I'm not willing to upload a package that introduces such bugs.
Hum...
Ok, thks for
On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 16:14 +0200, Matthijs Mohlmann wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for a sponsor for libpam-heimdal. With this module it is
possible to authenticate against a heimdal kerberos server. It requests
a ticket for you like the kinit program.
Download:
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 12:43:02AM +0200, Krugaan wrote:
Frank K?ster schrieb:
Krugaan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I splitted the code base to keep the command line version free from the
overhead needed by the GUI.
If there is a chance to get a sponsor for the command line version, I
don't mind
Hi,
hm, that feels stupid. It was in the parent directory.
Not it's in the right place.
Regards,
Matthijs Mohlmann
Bruno Barrera C. wrote:
On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 16:14 +0200, Matthijs Mohlmann wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for a sponsor for libpam-heimdal. With this module it is
possible to
Hello, I'm looking for a sponsor for a scientific calculator, wcalc.
It's a command line calculator, my favourite, it uses intuitive expressions
(e.g. 5sin 4!-7*2(4%6)^2), the base conversion is immediate, you can just
type:
$ wcalc -o 0x3b+0b1011/4
= 075
and get the octal value from operations
Hi Daniele,
The project can be found here: http://w-calc.sf.net
This is my first debian package and my first request for sponsor, I don't
know if I should link now the .changes, .dsc, .orig.tar.gz, .diff.gz, and
.deb, so I'll link them only on demand.
For review and successful sponsorship
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 08:35:17PM +0200, Daniele Sempione wrote:
This is my first debian package and my first request for sponsor, I
don't know if I should link now the .changes, .dsc, .orig.tar.gz,
.diff.gz, and .deb, so I'll link them only on demand.
Prospective sponsors will want to see
Hi Kilian,
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 09:46:05PM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote:
For review and successful sponsorship you need to provide the
*.orig.tar.gz (which should be the same as on w-calc.sf.net unless you
need to repackage for a VERY GOOD REASON), the *.diff.gz and the *.dsc.
You can find
Hi Daniele,
Am Sonntag, den 04.09.2005, 23:44 +0200 schrieb Daniele Sempione:
Hi Kilian,
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 09:46:05PM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote:
For review and successful sponsorship you need to provide the
*.orig.tar.gz (which should be the same as on w-calc.sf.net unless you
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 11:22:33PM +1000, skaller wrote:
On Sun, 2005-09-04 at 04:08 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 08:06:07PM +1000, skaller wrote:
The second part,
MIT_KRB5_17 {
global:
*;
}
specifies a symbol version to apply to all other exported
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 12:06:37AM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote:
Let's see:
$ diffstat *.diff.gz
config.guess| 1466 +
config.sub | 1579
configure |
Hello,
I'm searching for a sponsor for libxml-libxslt-perl, which I indent to
adopt. The new upload fixes three bugs, builds fine with pbuilder, is
linda and lintian (exept one warning which can be ignored) clean and
does quite a lot other improvements. It's available at
I received an e-mail from a contributer of a Debian package I maintain.
The mail says his e-mail address is no longer operational and he has
a new one. Because his work is an important part of the package,
it will be good to mention it in the changelog of the package.
The problem is that the
Dear ITtoolbox Groups Subscriber,
Your message has NOT been distributed to the ITtoolbox BusinessObjects-L
discussion group. Please continue reading for further details and instructions.
On Wednesday, May 26, 2004, ITtoolbox launched nine new discussion topics, each
focusing on specific
On Sun, 04 Sep 2005, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
to it is not very safe. I have no other way to contact him.
What should I do?
If he is a contributor to a package you take care of, write a message there
that he must send you a gpg-signed message from his new address.
Apparently he does not have a gpg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Oohara Yuuma wrote:
I received an e-mail from a contributer of a Debian package I maintain.
The mail says his e-mail address is no longer operational and he has
a new one. Because his work is an important part of the package,
it will be good to
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 03:37:52PM +0200, Romain Beauxis wrote:
Le Dimanche 4 Septembre 2005 06:52, Steve Langasek a écrit :
I've looked over the package update, and for the most part it looks ok,
but the new Portuguese translation that upstream included is quite buggy
and I'm not willing
26 matches
Mail list logo
