On 13-Sep-2005, LI Daobing wrote:
> On 9/13/05, Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why not write a manpage? There are tools that automate that. (And
> > if you do not like roff, you can still use pod, etc.)
> a manpage for a gui program without argument supporting is useless,
I strongly
On 9/13/05, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 01:27:22PM +0800, LI Daobing wrote:
>
> > > * debian/rules:
> > > DEB_AUTO_UPDATE_DEBIAN_CONTROL := yes
> > > This sucks, the generated control file is ugly as hell (it does
> > > build-depend on build-essential,
Hi!
Christoph Berg wrote:
Re: Nelson A. de Oliveira in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I am planning to rename the source package to "biofox" only,
> instead mozilla-firefox-biofox.
Why? The user won't see the source package name change. It's only
extra hassle for you and the ftp-masters. If you re
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 01:27:22PM +0800, LI Daobing wrote:
> > * debian/rules:
> > DEB_AUTO_UPDATE_DEBIAN_CONTROL := yes
> > This sucks, the generated control file is ugly as hell (it does
> > build-depend on build-essential, etc.). Please fix that.
> I don't agree, at least it works.
No,
On 9/13/05, Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Re: LI Daobing in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I need a uploader for the new version of qterm. it's not lintian and
> > linda clean(without-manpages). I have uploaded it to mentors[1], and
> > submit it at sponsors.
>
> Why not write a manpage? Th
Re: LI Daobing in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I need a uploader for the new version of qterm. it's not lintian and
> linda clean(without-manpages). I have uploaded it to mentors[1], and
> submit it at sponsors.
Why not write a manpage? There are tools that automate that. (And if
you do not like roff, yo
On 13-Sep-2005, Christoph Berg wrote:
> debian/copyright:
> [...]
> | License:
> | Copyright (c) The Regents of the University of California.
> | All rights reserved.
>
> I'm sure this is wrong :)
>
> Apart from that, no source file includes a (C) statement. You might
> want to ask upstream to in
Re: Craig Small in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > IMO, the description should be about the application, it shouldn't
> > > be a comparative.
> >
> > Agreed. I'd say rather that enough information about the application
> > should be included so that the reader can make their own comparison.
>
> You can
Re: Nelson A. de Oliveira in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I am planning to rename the source package to "biofox" only, instead
> mozilla-firefox-biofox.
Why? The user won't see the source package name change. It's only
extra hassle for you and the ftp-masters. If you really want, rename
the binary packa
Re: Frédéric BOITEUX in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > According to the bts, there's only a RFH, not an O. Did he forget to do
> > this?
>
> I don't know if he has really orphaned it, but in the fact, he don't have time
> to maintain it and didn't found another DD to help him, only some outside
> Debi
Re: Giuseppe Martino in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 01:44:14PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > The proper way to fix that is to ship a bootstrapped .tar.bz2.
>
> Ok, I replaced every link with a copy of its normal file
> (`config/install-sh' `config/mkinstalldirs' `config/missin
Re: Patryk Cisek in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Name: xmms-musepack
> Version: 1.2
> Section: sound
> License: BSD
> RFP -> ITP: 241287
> Upstram home page:http://musepack.
Re: Stan Vasilyev in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I am looking for a sponsor for a series of packages I adopted and rebuilt:
>
> bbsload (new upstream version)
> bbappconf (same version, fixed some documentation)
> bbpager (same version, fixed some documentation)
>
> Coming soon:
> mindterm, ksocrat, un
Hello Kilian,
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 01:41:26AM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote:
> apparently config.* and parser.* as well as scanner.c are still present.
> Could you fix these please?
ok, I fixed them: http://ilcrow.altervista.org/wcalc-2.0.stuff.tar
> About the debian/copyright, i'm not entirely s
Name: xmms-musepack
Version:1.2
Section:sound
License:BSD
RFP -> ITP: 241287
Upstram home page: http://musepack.net
You can get the package sources fro
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 08:50:54PM +0200, Giuseppe Martino wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 01:44:14PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > The proper way to fix that is to ship a bootstrapped .tar.bz2.
>
> Ok, I replaced every link with a copy of its normal file
> (`config/install-sh' `config/mkinsta
I am looking for a sponsor for a series of packages I adopted and rebuilt:
bbsload (new upstream version)
bbappconf (same version, fixed some documentation)
bbpager (same version, fixed some documentation)
Coming soon:
mindterm, ksocrat, uncc and maybe more
All packages are available at my perso
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 01:44:14PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> The proper way to fix that is to ship a bootstrapped .tar.bz2.
Ok, I replaced every link with a copy of its normal file
(`config/install-sh' `config/mkinstalldirs' `config/missing' `./COPYING' & Co.)
using:
for I in $(find -type l)
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 04:14:57PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Bas Wijnen in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Please provide an updated upstream tarball.
> > >
> > > This will allow you to drop the build-dependency on the autotools,
> > > which is considered evil by most people anyway.
> >
> > Hu
Re: Bas Wijnen in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Please provide an updated upstream tarball.
> >
> > This will allow you to drop the build-dependency on the autotools,
> > which is considered evil by most people anyway.
>
> Huh? Looking at the output of bootstrap, it runs the autotools. Or do you
> me
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 01:44:14PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Giuseppe Martino in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >But what's more important. The build failed here:
> > >
> > >configure: error: cannot find install-sh or install.sh in config
> > >./config
> > >make: *** [config.status] Error 1
> >
* Justin Pryzby [Mon, 12 Sep 2005 01:52:32 -0400]:
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 10:31:06PM -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> > I am planning to rename the source package to "biofox" only, instead
> > mozilla-firefox-biofox.
> > May I do this? How can I do this? Is it there some policy saying ab
Re: Giuseppe Martino in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >But what's more important. The build failed here:
> >
> >configure: error: cannot find install-sh or install.sh in config
> >./config
> >make: *** [config.status] Error 1
>
> The problem is a missed Build-Depends aboud automake1.9.
The proper way to
23 matches
Mail list logo
