Justin Pryzby wrote:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/12/msg00194.html
Yep. This too:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/12/msg7.html
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Carlo Segre [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
Q1) Where am I doing wrong? How can I get rid of this error?
I think that this has to do with the -1 in the name of the original
tarball.
No. Please read the Debian Policy: Only the part of the version
Hi Pierre,
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 09:57:54AM +0200, Pierre Machard wrote:
I was about to upload Kestutis Biliunas package, when I saw recent
activities in the BTS. That's why I am sending this email.
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 10:48:14AM +0300, K?stutis Bili?nas wrote:
I am looking
2005/9/29, Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Comments:
* Delete all the Makefile.in, config.h.in during debian/rules
clean, or make otherwise make it so that they are not in the
diff.gz
done
* Any reason for using experimental instead of unstable in the
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 06:05:47PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
snip
H, I wonder where this should be spelled out so people get it right:
1. Get interested in a package
2. Find it is not in debian
3. Check if it can be packaged and if it is already being packaged
4.
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 12:16 +0200, Joost van Baal wrote:
On http://www.debian.org/ there is a link called Help Debian, to
http://www.debian.org/devel/join/ (How You Can Help.
Perhaps that page should incorporate your (very nice!) checklist.
And/or maybe it should link to
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 01:36:03PM +0200, Joost van Baal wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 10:43:25AM +0200, Joost van Baal wrote:
plan to upload today.
I've just uploaded K??stutis's latest version of 1.2-1 .
Ok that's nice.
Cheers,
--
Pierre
2005/9/29, Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 17:19 +0800, Emfox Zhou wrote:
* short and long description in debian/control needs improvement.
A one line long description is not enough.
improved
I suggest adjusting the grammar.
ahhh, sorry for my poor
Hello, hello,
the glurp[0] and skippy[1] packages are already in the archive, and back
From my long period of inactivity I'm now needing sponsors for these
packages.
These uploads fix bugs ! they are good for your karma =)
everything can be found here:
[0]
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 06:30:29PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 12:16 +0200, Joost van Baal wrote:
On http://www.debian.org/ there is a link called Help Debian, to
http://www.debian.org/devel/join/ (How You Can Help.
Perhaps that page should incorporate your (very
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 01:13:19PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 06:30:29PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 12:16 +0200, Joost van Baal wrote:
On http://www.debian.org/ there is a link called Help Debian, to
http://www.debian.org/devel/join/ (How You
I am writing from Tanzania,
I am student of Secondary school, and my full name is Veronica John, I ave 21 years old. I am asking for you to help me just to pay a school fees. I am in form two right now. Per year we need 400$, for schol fees, this is for accomodation and food and other things.
My
veronica massawe wrote:
I am student of Secondary school, and my full name is Veronica John, I
ave 21 years old. I am asking for you to help me just to pay a school
fees. I am in form two right now. Per year we need 400$, for schol fees,
this is for accomodation and food and other things.
My
Hi,
Thomas Viehmann wrote:
[...]
not necessarily. It must be the original, but it must not be pristine.
One reason could be to remove autotools dependencies, another could be
to remove files which would otherwise be removed by the clean target
and would end up in a huge diff.gz.
Sorry, but I
Le Jeudi 29 Septembre 2005 20:51, Damyan Ivanov a écrit :
A very interesting question is Is this spam or not?
Well, try to send him a mail, you'll see :)
Personally, I won't :)
Romain
--
They tried to fool the black population,
By telling them that Jah Jah dead.
But II know that Jah no dead!
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 20:57 +0200, Romain Beauxis wrote:
Le Jeudi 29 Septembre 2005 20:51, Damyan Ivanov a écrit :
A very interesting question is Is this spam or not?
It is more not than yes. I think she is just a too young girl doesn't
know about life, internet and things in general.
She
Andreas Fester wrote:
Sorry, but I have to point out that your recommendation describes the
very opposite of Debian best packaging practices.
I am just not sure how strong this practice should be seen. My
Quite frankly, I was disappointed that this recommendation didn't get
more criticism. The
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 09:51:06PM +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
veronica massawe wrote:
I am student of Secondary school, and my full name is Veronica John, I
ave 21 years old. I am asking for you to help me just to pay a school
fees. I am in form two right now. Per year we need 400$, for
Le Jeudi 29 Septembre 2005 21:11, Laszlo Boszormenyi a écrit :
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 20:57 +0200, Romain Beauxis wrote:
Le Jeudi 29 Septembre 2005 20:51, Damyan Ivanov a écrit :
A very interesting question is Is this spam or not?
It is more not than yes. I think she is just a too young
Hi,
I am currently adopting synopsis, a source code documentation
tool specially suited for python, but also useable for
C and C++. I created a first package from the new upstream
version which is available at http://www.littletux.net/debian.
The package is not yet lintian clean, and this leads
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 08:57:38PM +0200, Romain Beauxis wrote:
Le Jeudi 29 Septembre 2005 20:51, Damyan Ivanov a écrit :
A very interesting question is Is this spam or not?
Well, try to send him a mail, you'll see :)
Personally, I won't :)
Isn't it totally irrelevant anyway? Last time I
See my recent message to -mentors and -devel, Nonpublic shared
libraries. It sees that rpath could be used here because it is a
private library, not used by other packages. In the future, if that
changes, it will have to have a soname. For now, you could also just
install to
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 06:22:43PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
Sorry, but I have to point out that your recommendation describes the
very opposite of Debian best packaging practices.
- Basically, the only reason to repackage upstream is to avoid license
problems. Dropping unneccessary
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 01:13:19PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 06:30:29PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 12:16 +0200, Joost van Baal wrote:
On http://www.debian.org/ there is a link called Help Debian, to
http://www.debian.org/devel/join/ (How You
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
You might consider using the -v 0.2.2.1 option in dh_make to
convert this to a compliant version number. The second -1 will still be
there in the final package because that is the debian revision. The cause
that lintian has suggested does not seem to be your
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 11:00:47PM -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
You might consider using the -v 0.2.2.1 option in dh_make to
convert this to a compliant version number. The second -1 will still be
there in the final package because that is the debian
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 18:23 +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
Hi,
Paul Wise wrote:
* Delete all the Makefile.in, config.h.in during debian/rules
clean, or make otherwise make it so that they are not in the
diff.gz
Why's that? What's the alternative?
Mainly because for
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Justin Pryzby wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 11:00:47PM -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
You might consider using the -v 0.2.2.1 option in dh_make to
convert this to a compliant version number. The second -1 will still be
there in the final
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 10:42:44PM -0500, Carlo Segre wrote:
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Justin Pryzby wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 11:00:47PM -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
You might consider using the -v 0.2.2.1 option in dh_make to
convert this to a compliant
Note that bootstrapping autotoolage at build-time is an official QA
nightmare [1] and if Dante would put
1. Don't believe me, look at Sam Hocevar's QA meeting talk slides:
http://sam.zoy.org/lectures/20050910-debian/img16.html
Yes, this is what EmfoxZhou was doing before, running
30 matches
Mail list logo