On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lastly, Florian Ernst kindly sponsored my sextractor package last
week; it is now waiting in the new queue. ds9 is already available in
Debian (though it won't be for much longer if upstream doesn't provide
unobfuscated source in their v4
Justin Pryzby wrote:
I still don't know anything about info format, but I just looked at
/usr/share/info/cppinternals.info.gz, which has, on line 5:
START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY
* cppinternals-4.0: (cppinternals-4.0). Cpplib internals.
END-INFO-DIR-ENTRY
So,
sed -e
Hi,
I re-read carefully the Debian new maintainer guide.
I took a look at the content of the rules file, and did not see where
to set the ./configure option.
I recompile a package in order to tune these option and dont see where
to set them.
Thenk you for any help :-)
--
Administration
Hi mentors,
In order to keep track of my changes in the development of my packages I've
decided to put my debian folder with all the packages and sources inside
into a svn repo.
My question is simple: Are there common pitfalls I should look out for? I
could imagine, that all the new .svn dirs in
Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote:
Hi,
I re-read carefully the Debian new maintainer guide.
I took a look at the content of the rules file, and did not see where
to set the ./configure option.
I recompile a package in order to tune these option and dont see where
to set them.
If you tell the
Bastian Venthur wrote:
Hi mentors,
In order to keep track of my changes in the development of my packages I've
decided to put my debian folder with all the packages and sources inside
into a svn repo.
Good.
No need to put all sources in the repo, though. Use dpatch or something like it
and
Hello *,
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 10:53:29AM +0200, Bastian Venthur wrote:
In order to keep track of my changes in the development of my packages I've
decided to put my debian folder with all the packages and sources inside
into a svn repo.
My question is simple: Are there common pitfalls I
On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 12:00 +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
tell us which package this is first.
I do apologize.
It is the icecast2 package.
Lateste available package (unstable) is 2.2.0
Icecast 2.3.0 is out:
http://downloads.xiph.org/releases/icecast/icecast-2.3.0.tar.gz
I want to force enabling
Hello *,
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 12:04:24PM +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
No need to put all sources in the repo, though. Use dpatch or something like
it
^^^
and you'll have to put only debian/ under revision
Le Jeudi 13 Octobre 2005 10:53, Bastian Venthur a écrit :
Hi mentors,
In order to keep track of my changes in the development of my packages I've
decided to put my debian folder with all the packages and sources inside
into a svn repo.
My question is simple: Are there common pitfalls I
Florian Ernst wrote:
Hello *,
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 12:04:24PM +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
No need to put all sources in the repo, though. Use dpatch or something like
it
^^^
and you'll have to put only
Norbert Preining [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the unstable branch? Because if it's within a month or so, then
there's no need for me to ask my sponsor to upload the teTeX2
dependant package now.
I guess (but I am not Frank) that within a month it should happen, quite
sure.
I guess so, too.
Fathi Boudra wrote:
Le Jeudi 13 Octobre 2005 10:53, Bastian Venthur a écrit :
Hi mentors,
In order to keep track of my changes in the development of my packages
I've decided to put my debian folder with all the packages and sources
inside into a svn repo.
My question is simple: Are there
Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote:
On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 12:00 +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
tell us which package this is first.
I do apologize.
It is the icecast2 package.
Lateste available package (unstable) is 2.2.0
icecast2 uses cdbs, as suspected :-)
Icecast 2.3.0 is out:
BTW: how do I make pdebuild and
debuild to ignore the .svn dirs?
instead checkout, use export. it gives you an arbo. without the svn dirs.
cheers,
Fathi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bastian Venthur wrote:
BTW: how do I make pdebuild and
debuild to ignore the .svn dirs?
`debuild -i' works for sure. It passes all short options to build-package.
Don't know about pdebuild.
dam
--
Damyan Ivanov Creditreform Bulgaria
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Am Donnerstag, den 13.10.2005, 11:59 +0200 schrieb Bastian Venthur:
Fathi Boudra wrote:
Le Jeudi 13 Octobre 2005 10:53, Bastian Venthur a écrit :
Hi mentors,
In order to keep track of my changes in the development of my packages
I've decided to put my debian folder with all the packages
Hi.
I was wondering if there's a more open alternative to developing
packages? Is there some place I can get the newest packages from
non-official developers? A homepage where you can register and start
posting and using packages from different people through apt?
Currently I could only find a
Quoting Bram Neijt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi.
I was wondering if there's a more open alternative to developing
packages? Is there some place I can get the newest packages from
non-official developers? A homepage where you can register and start
posting and using packages from different people
Quoting Damyan Ivanov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
While dropping dpatch is unthinkable for me (it helps a great deal when
reviewing diff.gz for unwanted changes), documenting its usage in
README.Debian
is indeed a very good idea.
Except that README.Debian is not the place for something like that.
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
Quoting Damyan Ivanov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
While dropping dpatch is unthinkable for me (it helps a great deal when
reviewing diff.gz for unwanted changes), documenting its usage in
README.Debian
is indeed a very good idea.
Except that README.Debian is not the
Daniel Leidert wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 13.10.2005, 11:59 +0200 schrieb Bastian Venthur:
Does anything speak against my method? BTW: how do I make pdebuild and
debuild to ignore the .svn dirs?
Make an export, not a checkout. But normally debuild/pdebuild should not
Explicit export is not
The last paragraph at The debian-mentors FAQ, located
http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html reads:
Consider setting up a sponsoring alias for you and your sponsee, by
creating a file in your home directory on master.debian.org called
.forward-sponsoring-jbloggs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/13/2005 10:59 AM, Amaya wrote:
The last paragraph at The debian-mentors FAQ, located
http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html reads:
Consider setting up a sponsoring alias for you and your sponsee, by
creating a file
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) wrote:
The idea is make easier to contact maintainer and sponsor. :o)
Handy indeed.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Where I assume faw is the package name. src? binary?
Hope it helps, kind regards. :-)
It does. Maybe the web page should be made
Amaya wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Where I assume faw is the package name. src? binary?
Or (more canonically) the sponsored person. It's free-form really,
examples can be found with ls /home/*/.forward-* on m.d.o.
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
--
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 04:20:45PM +0200, Amaya wrote:
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Where I assume faw is the package name. src? binary?
I think 'faw' is an initialization of Felipe's name (see his From:
header). So:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Am Donnerstag, den 13.10.2005, 15:32 +0300 schrieb Damyan Ivanov:
Daniel Leidert wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 13.10.2005, 11:59 +0200 schrieb Bastian Venthur:
Does anything speak against my method? BTW: how do I make pdebuild and
debuild to ignore the .svn dirs?
Make an export, not a
28 matches
Mail list logo
