Re: Re: Questions about gnu.org versus debian bugs.

On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 01:21:27PM -0800, Ewa Matejska wrote: > Hi, > > Thank you for your quick response. I've made sure to check whether > this bug has already been filed against Debian. > I'm sure that this is a bug in the gdb source code because I've compiled > the latest gdb source code fro

Re: Re: Questions about gnu.org versus debian bugs.

On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 01:23:36PM -0800, Ewa Matejska wrote: > Hi Justin, > > Thank you for your quick response. > I will stick with the bug against gdb source on gdb.org. > > For future reference, which is the correct mailing list? Hmmm debian-user maybe or debian-devel. debian-mentors is abou

Re: Re: Questions about gnu.org versus debian bugs.

Hi Justin, Thank you for your quick response. I will stick with the bug against gdb source on gdb.org. For future reference, which is the correct mailing list? Thank You, Ewa.

Re: Re: Questions about gnu.org versus debian bugs.

Hi, Thank you for your quick response. I've made sure to check whether this bug has already been filed against Debian. I'm sure that this is a bug in the gdb source code because I've compiled the latest gdb source code from gnu.org and found the place in the source where the fix is likely needed

Re: Questions about gnu.org versus debian bugs.

On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 20:35 +, Neil Williams wrote: > On Monday 28 November 2005 7:49 pm, Ewa Matejska wrote: > > I'm new to filing bugs with Debian and I want to make sure to do this > > right. If I file a bug against gnu.org (gdb), > > It might just be me, but gdb gets blamed for a host of

Re: Questions about gnu.org versus debian bugs.

On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 11:49:38AM -0800, Ewa Matejska wrote: > Hi, > > I'm new to filing bugs with Debian and I want to make sure to do this > right. If I file a bug against gnu.org (gdb), is it OK for me to file > the same bug against the relevant Debian package as well? It > reproduces with

Re: Questions about gnu.org versus debian bugs.

On Monday 28 November 2005 7:49 pm, Ewa Matejska wrote: > I'm new to filing bugs with Debian and I want to make sure to do this > right. If I file a bug against gnu.org (gdb), It might just be me, but gdb gets blamed for a host of bugs that are actually in the program or build environment of the

Questions about gnu.org versus debian bugs.

Hi, I'm new to filing bugs with Debian and I want to make sure to do this right. If I file a bug against gnu.org (gdb), is it OK for me to file the same bug against the relevant Debian package as well? It reproduces with both. Thank You, Ewa.

Re: ITP: kat -- desktop search environment for KDE

> As you're the first one for the ITP, are you interested in co-maintaining > it, but feel free to maintain it alone, it is just an offer. > Maybe you can share code, work and the fun to working together. > [Cc'ed kubuntu pkger.] what do you think of the offers ? cheers, Fathi -- To UNSUBS

RFS - wmmp - mpd applet client - ITP #327473

Hi all WMmp is client program for MPD (Music Player Daemon). It is dockapp and is simmilar to WMxmms. Packages are at: http://www.cihar.com/tmp/wmmp/ Further information available on MPD wiki: http://mpd.wikicities.com/wiki/Client:WMmp There was already one attempt for upload, however it was r

RFS - gammu - mobile phone utility - ITP #180632

Hi all yet another package ready for upload - Gammu. It is command line utility and library to access mobile phone functions. It can work with many phones like Nokia, Alcatel, Siemens, etc. Packages available at . Upstream website: PS: py

RFS - enca - charset analyzer

Hi all this is first of my spams to this list :-). I've ready new version of enca to upload, but current sponsor doesn't have time for this, can somebody look at it and possibly further versions? Nothing big has changed, so there should not be much problems, of course linda and lintian do not

Re: RFS: fhist -- File history, comparison and merge utilities

On Nov 29 2005, Chris Bannister wrote: > On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 07:47:40PM -0200, Rogério Brito wrote: > > And, if the Postscript is properly made, it would be nice to > > substitute both the DVI file and the Postscript file with just a > > single PDF file. > > Since when? Since the PDF files ar

Re: RFS: fhist -- File history, comparison and merge utilities

On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 07:47:40PM -0200, Rogério Brito wrote: > On Nov 20 2005, Russ Allbery wrote: > > Furthermore, some of that size is the DVI versions of the > > documentation, which are of marginal utility given that PostScript is > > also already included. > > And, if the Postscript is prop

Re: upstream changed the source tarball name...

Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>-- But, how do I properly inform the ftp masters that the old >> 'acovea' source has been replaced by the new 'libacovea' source, >> even though both produce a binary package called 'acovea' (and >> should do so)? ITP the new stuff