Re: RFS: tex4ht

2005-12-14 Thread Norbert Preining
On Fre, 09 Dez 2005, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote: > http://www.imsc.res.in/~kapil/tex4ht/tex4ht/tex4ht_20051130-1.dsc Now it is uploaded and close to be moved into the archive, I `repackaged' it locally to depend | texlive-base-bin, I realized that there is a *stupid* error: Package: tex4ht

Re: RFS - kde window decoration powder

2005-12-14 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2005-12-14, Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The templates have a liberal license. Your modifications, if not > trivial, are copyright you, and it would be good to note that. It I will describe my modifications as really trivial. adding --disable-rpath to one line - and remove some

Re: RFS: tex4ht

2005-12-14 Thread Rogério Brito
Hi, Kapil, Norbert and others. On Dec 14 2005, Norbert Preining wrote: > Please before uploading be so nice and make an > upgrade/remove/install/purge/install-cycle test. ... with a clean chroot environment, if possible. Indeed, the suggestion made by Norbert is actually quite important. Especia

Re: RFS: tex4ht

2005-12-14 Thread Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 09:14:39AM -0200, Rogério Brito wrote: >Hi, Kapil, Norbert and others. > >On Dec 14 2005, Norbert Preining wrote: >>Please before uploading be so nice and make an >>upgrade/remove/install/purge/install-cycle test. > >... with a clean chroot environment, if possible. It was

Re: RFS: tex4ht

2005-12-14 Thread Kapil Hari Paranjape
d checked it! I will fix this right away. There is a new package version 20051214-1 at the same location. Regards, Kapil. -- signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: tex4ht

2005-12-14 Thread Norbert Preining
On Mit, 14 Dez 2005, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote: > There is a new package version 20051214-1 at the same location. Where? http://www.imsc.res.in/~kapil/tex4ht/ The requested URL /~kapil/tex4ht/ was not found on this server. Best wishes Norb

Re: RFS: tex4ht

2005-12-14 Thread Norbert Preining
On Mit, 14 Dez 2005, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote: > There is a new package version 20051214-1 at the same location. Can you also include teh dependency: tetex-bin | texlive-base-bin instead of pure tetex-bin. So users of the texlive packages can use it without having to get my hac

Re: RFS: new package bbbike

2005-12-14 Thread Nico Golde
Hi, * Slaven Rezic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-12-14 12:19]: [...] > There's already an RFP for bbbike: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=210245 Please rename this bug to ITP if you packaged it, RFPs are only used if you want it as package but will not make it by yourself. Regard

How to ensure whether an ITP has been raised for ICE

2005-12-14 Thread Prasad Kadambi
Hi All, I just wanted to know whether an ITP has been raised for packaging ICE (Internet Communication Engine) ? Ice is a middleware like CORBA. Please check http://zeroc.com/  for more details. I searched for the ITP in http://debian.org/devel/wnpp/ and could not find. Please help. TIA Prasad

Re: RFS: tex4ht

2005-12-14 Thread Rogério Brito
On Dec 14 2005, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 09:14:39AM -0200, Rogério Brito wrote: > >... with a clean chroot environment, if possible. > > It was build (pbuilder) and installed (piuparts) in clean chroots. Ooops. Sorry. :-) That's what you get for jumping in the mid

Re: RFS: libprefork-perl -- Module loading for forking or non-forking processes in Perl

2005-12-14 Thread Neil McGovern
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 03:14:14PM +0100, Jonas Genannt wrote: > > Hello, > > I am searching for an sponsor for my libprefork-perl package. Hi there, I'll be happy to uplaod this if you haven't found a sponsor yet. Cheers, Neil -- __ .` `. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Application Manager : :'

Re: RFS: libprefork-perl -- Module loading for forking or non-forking processes in Perl

2005-12-14 Thread Jonas Genannt
Hello Neil, Neil McGovern wrote: > I'll be happy to uplaod this if you haven't found a sponsor yet. No, have not found any sponsor, so I will happy if you could upload it. Greets, Jonas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E

Re: How to ensure whether an ITP has been raised for ICE

2005-12-14 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 06:09:03PM +0530, Prasad Kadambi wrote: > Hi All, > > I just wanted to know whether an ITP has been raised for packaging > ICE (Internet Communication Engine) ? > > Ice is a middleware like CORBA. Please check http://zeroc.com/ for > more details. > > I searched for the

Re: How to ensure whether an ITP has been raised for ICE

2005-12-14 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 18:09 +0530, Prasad Kadambi wrote: > I searched for the ITP in http://debian.org/devel/wnpp/ and could not > find. Please help. http://bugs.debian.org/wnpp doesn't show any indication either. I did find this page via google: http://ice.jgaa.com/ The source package is a nati

RFS: libtest-classapi-perl -- Perl extension for basic first-pass API testing for class trees

2005-12-14 Thread Jonas Genannt
Hello, I am searching for an sponsor for my libtest-classapi-perl package. * Package name: libtest-classapi-perl Version : 1.02 Upstream Author : Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://search.cpan.org/~adamk/ * License : GPL Description : Perl ex

Re: RFS: gcx - astronomical image processing and photometry

2005-12-14 Thread Radu Spineanu
Hi, Radu Corlan wrote: > Hi, > > I'm looking for a sponsor for gcx, an astronomical gtk app. I'm also > the upstream author for this package, which has had about two dozen > public source releases in the last 2.5 years (see freshmeat page: > http://freshmeat.net/gcx for statistics). > I'll look

RFS: libcrypt-hcesha-perl -- Perl extension for one way hash chaining encryption using SHA

2005-12-14 Thread Jonas Genannt
Hello, I am searching for an sponsor for my libcrypt-hcesha-perl package. * Package name: libcrypt-hcesha-perl Version : 0.70 Upstream Author : Eric Estabrooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://search.cpan.org/~eestabroo * License : GPL Description : Per

Re: RFS: cdrbq -- graphical cd burning frontend

2005-12-14 Thread Mario Iseli
On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 19:15 +0100, Mario Iseli wrote: > So, i have now fixed the dependency, so it should be no problem for the > users (when etch is stable) to upgrade. There is also the dummy package > (will be removed in the stable release after etch), it contains a > bash-script (suggested by J