On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 01:20:31AM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> [Steve Halasz]
> > Hopefully we can manage to split the two APIs into different
> > packages. But for now, how should I name the package when the ABI has
> > changed, but the SONAME hasn't?
> Splitting into two packages is indeed
[Justin Pryzby]
> If each runtime package Conflicts+Provides+Replaces the virual
> package libgdal, then you will be able to ensure that only a single
> such package is installed.
And that is *far* from optimal. Few things are so annoying as wanting
to install two packages which conflict for rea
owner 325246 michael spang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
retitle 325246 ITP: firefox-greasemonkey -- firefox extension which enables
customization of webpages with user scripts
merge 325246 341915
thank you
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 11:27:35PM -0500, Michael Spang wrote:
> RFP: #325246
> ITP: #341915
I hope
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 12:33:38AM -0500, Steve Halasz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been helping to package the GDAL library. It contains a C and a C++
> API. The upstream maintainer has decided not to guarantee ABI
> compatibility even between minor releases. He updates the SONAME
> correctly for the C
Hi,
I've been helping to package the GDAL library. It contains a C and a C++
API. The upstream maintainer has decided not to guarantee ABI
compatibility even between minor releases. He updates the SONAME
correctly for the C API. Hopefully we can manage to split the two APIs
into different packages
Package name: firefox-greasemonkey
Version : 0.6.4
Upstream Author : Aaron Boodman
URL : http://greasemonkey.mozdev.org/
License : No restrictions
Description : firefox extension which enables customization of webpages
with user scripts
Greasemonkey allows use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marcus Better wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am packaging some software and would like testers to try out my
> packages. What is the best way to choose version numbers for the package
> under development so that:
> (1) Testers can use "apt-get upgrade" to down
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 03:32:42PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 08:47:44AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > Since bzr (and other arch derivates) have the benefit of NEVER forgeting
> > > which chan
Hi J.!
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 08:47:44AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > Since bzr (and other arch derivates) have the benefit of NEVER forgeting
> > which changesets are in a tree, I prefer them over any other distributed
> > system.
Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have created rough Debian packages for Shishi:
> http://josefsson.org/shishi/debian/
> and I am looking for a sponsor who would be willing to help me improve
> them and eventually upload the packages into main.
> I can put the debian/ files into C
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 19 Dec 2005, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> This may not be the most popular opinion, particularly among fans of
>> distributed VCSes (and I do understand the merits), but wrapping your
>> mind around the distributed model isn't easy. I ca
I have created rough Debian packages for Shishi:
http://josefsson.org/shishi/debian/
and I am looking for a sponsor who would be willing to help me improve
them and eventually upload the packages into main.
I can put the debian/ files into CVS and give write access to
sponsors, if that would hel
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 07:23:11AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > Just to make sure we're all talking about the same thing, Sandro, are
> > you referring to this:
> >
> > http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Debian-Binary-Package-Building-HOWTO/
>
> Yes, I've used this one
>
> > I bring this up on the list n
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 08:47:44AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Since bzr (and other arch derivates) have the benefit of NEVER forgeting
> which changesets are in a tree, I prefer them over any other distributed
> system. If anyone knows of other distributed system that saw the ligh
Hi,
Marcus Better wrote:
(1) Testers can use "apt-get upgrade" to download the next test versions
from my private repository as I make them available.
I usually use 0.0.20051220 style version numbers for unreleased stuff.
You can add more zeros if you feel your first release will be 0.0.1, o
On Tuesday 20 December 2005 14:23, Marcus Better wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am packaging some software and would like testers to try out my
> packages. What is the best way to choose version numbers for the package
> under development so that:
Use foo_xxx-0.foo.1 .
So the initial debian version (which i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I am packaging some software and would like testers to try out my
packages. What is the best way to choose version numbers for the package
under development so that:
(1) Testers can use "apt-get upgrade" to download the next test versions
from
* Raphael Hertzog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait :
> following the last discussion at the Debian-QA meeting on Darmstadt, it
> appears that the proposal called "Collaborative maintenance" is of generic
> interest :
> - for Debian sponsors and Debian mentors
> - for QA which may use the infrastructure
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > In other words, a distributed VCS allows all parties to manage their own
> > repositories equally, and the project can nominate one of them the
> > "official" central repository, without impacting everyone's abili
Introducing the latest in the series of live art events from Eurogallery:
" Plasma Exhibitions "
Dear Artist, as you know it is not always easy to find a gallery to sell
your works, or an exhibition, and setting up, and attending an expo can be
a very costly business only to find your wor
20 matches
Mail list logo
