-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marcus Better wrote:
This contains font metric files (afm) for Adobe's standard fonts
(Courier, Times, Helvetica etc). These are, to my knowledge, not freely
distributable (?),
My mistake, they seem to be freely distributable.
Marcus
-BEGIN
I'm looking for a sponsor for a deb-package of setpwc. The package
would close #290553.
This application controls Philips webcams as well as some other
webcams based on the same electronics. A kernel-module is necessary to
access the cams.
The sources are licensed under GPL.
Upstream website:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marcus Better wrote:
Now I would like to know if there is a mechanism that can locate font
files (both afm and pfb) based on a name like Courier or Helvetica?
Ok, so I think that defoma might help here, right?
If I make my application defoma-aware
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marcus Better wrote:
My next question is: When my application is first installed, how will it
find out about the fonts that are already installed on the system?
Ah, I see, defoma is more clever than that, so it should work... I
appreciate if
Hi,
I did all changes suggested, and uploaded the package again.
I also wrote to debian-science.
The size_t changes are in the upstream cvs version, and,
thus, will be in the next upstream version of statist.
Thank you very much!
Jakson
On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 03:07:54PM +0800, Paul Wise
Hello,
I am searching for an sponsor for my libhtml-wikiconverter-perl package.
* Package name: libhtml-wikiconverter-perl
Version : 0.30
Upstream Author : David J. Iberri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~diberri/
* License : GPL / Artistic
Hello,
I have a weired problem because debian/tmp/etc/tdnewmsg.conf is there,
but not in the package. My
__( '/usr/src/tdnewmsg-2.0.0/debian/rules' )
/
| #!/usr/bin/make -f
| #
| # Rules for making the tdnewmsg package
| # Copyright (C) 2005 Michelle Konzack [EMAIL
On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 09:23:23PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 19:59:07 -0200, Rogério Brito [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Dec 25 2005, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
Ah yeah, this seems to contain the information. Thanks a lot. Is
there a good reason it is not in the policy?
Hi,
New upload http://www.iki.fi/simppa/debian-swftools/
Changes after the first upload:
- It now builds with or w/o lame; if the user has liblame-dev and
avifile-dev, it builds the full package; if the user has lame, but
not avifile, avi2swf is not build; if the user doesn't have lame,
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:27:04 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 09:23:23PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 19:59:07 -0200, Rogério Brito
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Dec 25 2005, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
Ah yeah, this seems to
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:27:04 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 09:23:23PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 19:59:07 -0200, Rogério Brito
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Dec 25 2005, Lionel Elie
* Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [051227 17:40]:
Do you think it would be an obstacle for development if that were
documented in the Policy, just as the same is documented for the
classical maintainer scripts? Why isn't it an obstacle for those
other scripts?
Well, I think any new script
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:41:00 +0100, Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
And I thought I could rely upon dpkg from the next upload to call
the configure script with the same arguments as it did before, just
as I can rely on the same for preinst, postinst etc.
Not more than what
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:41:00 +0100, Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
And I thought I could rely upon dpkg from the next upload to call
the configure script with the same arguments as it did before, just
as I can rely on the same for preinst,
Package: developers-reference, www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Please mention devconf-devel(7) in the developers reference and at
debian.org/devel/
I really hope its clear that debconf-devel needs to have something
else pointing to it, since it is the second time in 30 days that
someone has
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 03:32:42PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 08:47:44AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
wrote:
Since bzr (and other arch derivates) have
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, Russ Allbery wrote:
You just lost the people that I'm talking about. I can explain a
changeset, but merges are deep black magic that are extremely difficult to
understand except at a highly abstract level, and when using a distributed
VCS, they have to deal with merges
17 matches
Mail list logo
