Re: How to help with neglected packages

2006-01-19 Thread Amaya
Marcus Better wrote: I am not a DD. Should I ask someone to do an NMU on these packages? I have not yet carefully looked at your patches, but I would be happy to do so, and upload and so on... But finding a long term Maintainer would be much better. Would you be willing invest the time and

patches application

2006-01-19 Thread Rakotomandimby Mihamina
Hi, I made an update of a Debian package: zope2.9 The source is here: deb ftp://infogerance.locataire-serveur.info/debian/ testing main deb-src ftp://infogerance.locataire-serveur.info/debian/ testing main deb ftp://infogerance.locataire-serveur.info/debian/ unstable main deb-src

Re: patches application

2006-01-19 Thread Stan Vasilyev
On Thursday 19 January 2006 10:55 am, Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote: I have a problem on it: The patch located in 'debian/patches' is not applied. What could I do to diagnosys the reason the patch is not applied? You can do run dpatch manually to diagnose the problem. dpatch apply-all

Re: RFS: vrweb -- A VRML browser and editor [uploaded]

2006-01-19 Thread Stan Vasilyev
On Wednesday 18 January 2006 09:24 pm, Stan Vasilyev wrote: VRweb is a VRML 1 browser that you can use to browse a Virtual Reality World (WRL). This release fixes two bugs from BTS and a nasty build bug. The Debian sources are available at: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vrweb/

Re: patches application

2006-01-19 Thread John Lightsey
On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 19:55 +0100, Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote: I have a problem on it: The patch located in 'debian/patches' is not applied. What could I do to diagnosys the reason the patch is not applied? You need to change debian/rules in a few places. 1) You should have unpatch added

RFS: xdialog -- X11 replacement for the text util dialog

2006-01-19 Thread Stan Vasilyev
I recently adopted xdialog, packaged the new upstream version and made significant overhauls to the package. This release fixes five bugs. The Debian sources are here: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xdialog/ The ITA is here:

Re: RFS: xdialog -- X11 replacement for the text util dialog

2006-01-19 Thread Nico Golde
Hi, * Stan Vasilyev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-01-19 22:56]: I recently adopted xdialog, packaged the new upstream version and made significant overhauls to the package. This release fixes five bugs. The Debian sources are here: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xdialog/ The

Re: RFS: xdialog -- X11 replacement for the text util dialog

2006-01-19 Thread Stan Vasilyev
On Thursday 19 January 2006 02:07 pm, Nico Golde wrote: Package seems to be in a good shape (not tried to build), but what makes me wonder is the 20_no_msg.dpatch file. But imho the following hack should be a real fix forwarded to upstream. +/* no-g-msgs hack */ +void qqGLogFunc(const gchar

RFS: wmcpuload - Dockapp that displays the current CPU usage

2006-01-19 Thread Christian Aichinger
Hi, one of my packages, wmcpuload, needs a reupload due to the xlibs-dev removal (to fix #347046). There were only minimal changes made to the version currently in the archive, the package is lintian and linda clean. The package is available at: http://greek0.net/debian/packages/wmcpuload/4/

Re: patches application

2006-01-19 Thread Rakotomandimby Mihamina
On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 14:09 -0600, John Lightsey wrote: 1) You should have unpatch added to clean. Look at the way it's done in /usr/share/doc/dpatch/examples/rules/rules.new.non-dh.gz I got this: $ dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot dpkg-buildpackage: source package is zope2.9 dpkg-buildpackage:

Re: Bug#243941: How to help with neglected packages

2006-01-19 Thread Russell Coker
On Friday 20 January 2006 01:17, Amaya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Marcus Better wrote: I am not a DD. Should I ask someone to do an NMU on these packages? I have not yet carefully looked at your patches, but I would be happy to do so, and upload and so on... But finding a long term Maintainer

RE: RFS: wmcpuload - Dockapp that displays the current CPU usage

2006-01-19 Thread Miriam Ruiz
It seems that the webpage you mention has changed and redirects you to http://seiichisato.jp/dockapps/ Greetings, Miry __ LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo. Llamadas a fijos y móviles desde 1 céntimo por minuto.

Re: RFS: wmcpuload - Dockapp that displays the current CPU usage

2006-01-19 Thread Amaya
tags 347046 pending thanks Christian Aichinger wrote: one of my packages, wmcpuload, needs a reupload due to the xlibs-dev removal (to fix #347046). A sponsored upload is on its way. Thanks for fixing this! -- .''`. sleep: command not found : :' : `. `'

Re: Bug#243941: How to help with neglected packages

2006-01-19 Thread Amaya
Russell Coker wrote: I don't have the time that this package needs (as is probably obvious). I welcome a package takeover by someone such as Amaya. Hi there, Russell. While I am not interested in maintanining it, I will be happy to mentor Marcus, and be his sponsor too. If this is fine with

Re: patches application

2006-01-19 Thread John Lightsey
On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 01:02 +0100, Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote: On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 14:09 -0600, John Lightsey wrote: 1) You should have unpatch added to clean. Look at the way it's done in /usr/share/doc/dpatch/examples/rules/rules.new.non-dh.gz I got this: $ dpkg-buildpackage

Re: RFS: wmcpuload - Dockapp that displays the current CPU usage

2006-01-19 Thread Amaya
A sponsored upload is on its way. Looks like I was too fast to reply and Marc too slow to tag this pending ;) He will do the upload instead. Sorry for the noise -- .''`. sleep: command not found : :' : `. `' Proudly running unstable Debian GNU/Linux `-

Re: Bug#243941: How to help with neglected packages

2006-01-19 Thread Russell Coker
On Friday 20 January 2006 11:44, Amaya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Russell Coker wrote: I don't have the time that this package needs (as is probably obvious). I welcome a package takeover by someone such as Amaya. Hi there, Russell. While I am not interested in maintanining it, I will be