No offence taken ;)
What I meant is that the mailing list is a great place to start for the
beginner. Those who don't know - but want to learn. From my experience - a
lot of DDs dont want to "mother" you through learning how to package. Ok,
they'll help, but they dont want to teach from scratch :D
"Kevin B. McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank Küster wrote:
>
>> The main advantage of
>> quilt IMHO is that it doesn't duplicate the whole tree when editing and
>> updating the patch, which can be time- and disk-consuming in large
>> projects. Instead it keeps a list of files for the pat
Whenever I seem to relibtool a package now I always seem to get problems
with the timestamps being wrong, and the package tries to re-run automake.
Anyway, as a solution for that - we decided that the command
lsdiff --strip 1 debian/patches/10_update_libtool.diff | xargs touch -r
configure.in.in
Hi Mez! :-)
On 1/30/06, Martin Meredith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone know enough about automake (I dont) to stop it trying to
> run on a package build ?
I add AM_MAINTAINER_MODE somewhere at the top of configure.{ac,in} to
enable maintainer mode (which I believe prevents the checking
I do know of this - but looking for a solution for now so I dont have to go
down that road unless absolutely neccesary :d (for example - the lsdiff |
touch -r)
Zak B. Elep wrote:
> Hi Mez! :-)
>
> On 1/30/06, Martin Meredith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Does anyone know enough about autom
Frank Küster wrote:
> "Kevin B. McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Out of curiosity, does quilt have a mechanism similar to dpatch that
>>allows you to treat shell scripts as "patches"? My inability to find
>>such a feature was the main reason I opted for dpatch over quilt in the
>>Cernlib p
On Monday 30 January 2006 4:20 am, skaller wrote:
> * there is no provision for other than the limited set
> of resources (--cflags, --libs) that it supports
You can make any variable in the .pc file available - anything you can put
into the .pc using (e.g.) .pc.in can be made available to thos
<отправлено в группы и по почте>
Christoph Haas wrote:
> Found it. Checked it. Uploaded it.
Thank you.
> Minor thoughts on the package:
>
> - Please don't change past entries in the changelog even though
> I understand that you wanted to correct the line wrapping.
Yes, i understand such the
Hi all,
I'm packaging a C++ app that has packages like this:
foo - binary using the library
libfoo0 - the library itself
libfoo0-dev - headers and so on
libfoo0-doc - docs for the library
I'd like to add a package for debug information, since the app crashes
occasionally. Should I ad
also sprach Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.01.30.1518 +0100]:
> Secondly, is dh_strip -k the right way to do this?
Yes. It mostly automates the process too.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud D
Hi Martin,
Martin Meredith wrote:
[on AM_MAINTAINER_MODE]
> I do know of this - but looking for a solution for now so I dont have to go
> down that road unless absolutely neccesary :d (for example - the lsdiff |
> touch -r)
Well, probably the best solution is to get upstream to put in the
AM_
Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Kevin B. McCarty [Sun, 29 Jan 2006 11:39:17 -0500]:
>> Out of curiosity, does quilt have a mechanism similar to dpatch that
>> allows you to treat shell scripts as "patches"? My inability to find
>> such a feature was the main reason I opted for dpatch over quilt in the
Am 2006-01-21 13:44:28, schrieb Russ Allbery:
> The error message isn't about its presence in the source package but
> rather its presence in the generated binary package. In general, in
> Debian, you should never install additional copies of the GPL, the LGPL,
> or other common licenses; instead
Hello Derek,
You should post this question on
where are realy competent peoples creating CCD.
Greetings
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Linux Consultant
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
###
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 07:46:58AM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2006-01-21 13:44:28, schrieb Russ Allbery:
>
> > The error message isn't about its presence in the source package but
> > rather its presence in the generated binary package. In general, in
> > Debian, you should never install
On 30/01/2006 Jan C. Nordholz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > indeed, it sounds exactly like what i'm searching for.
> >
> > but unfortunately it looks like cryptsetup does not have support for
> > reading the password from stdin or command-line.
>
> ah, I see, it is using getpass(3) if no keyfile has been
>
On 29/01/2006 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2006, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> > now my question is, where should i place the check scripts instead?
> > is /lib/cryptsetup/{pre,post}check correct?
>
> Yes.
thanks.
...
jonas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 09:12:26PM -0800, Jon Saints wrote:
> I am new to packaging and just received this feedback
> on a package I helped to create:
>
> "I just noticed that gdal packaging needs one more
> revision because it
> create a -doc package in the binary-arch section.
libgdal-doc is [co
* Paul Wise [Mon, 30 Jan 2006 22:18:07 +0800]:
> Hi all,
> I'm packaging a C++ app that has packages like this:
> foo - binary using the library
> libfoo0 - the library itself
> libfoo0-dev - headers and so on
> libfoo0-doc - docs for the library
> I'd like to add a package for debu
* Martin Meredith [Mon, 30 Jan 2006 12:04:45 +]:
> lsdiff --strip 1 debian/patches/10_update_libtool.diff | xargs touch -r
> configure.in.in
> However I've just stumbled across a package where this doesnt work.
Then, if you insist on using touch-fu (I myself prefer it), you should
invest
Le Vendredi 30 Septembre 2005 12:14, Fathi Boudra a écrit :
> * Package name: ksplash-engine-moodin
> Version : 0.4.2
> Upstream Author : Christian Leh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://moodwrod.com/files/
> * License : GPL
> Description : fading splash
> > ah, I see, it is using getpass(3) if no keyfile has been
> > specified. Hmm, after having a glance at the source code,
> > the easiest thing seems to patch the source to accept
> > a new command-line option to specify a different input fd.
> > The rest of the code (lib/setup.c:get_key(), most i
I'm so sorry for that mail :/ I forgot to add -request...
--
Jérémie
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Respected sir/madam
I sonam chophel from bhutan would like to seek sponsorship for continuing my further studies.
My problem is that I am not in a position to furhter continue my
studies owing to limited source of income of my father, who happens to
be a poor farmer with a big family to suppport.
M
24 matches
Mail list logo
