Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 10:02:06PM +0100, Frank K?ster wrote:
>> Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > The question is, how do I solve this? Should I forcefully remove
>> > the conffile before calling update-rc.d? It feels really bad to
>> > re
Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Feb 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
>> - if it is changed, either keep it and insert a comment at its
>> beginning that it is unused, or move/rename it. In all cases where
>> the file's presence could have a bad effect, I renamed or moved
>> it
PyKaraoke is a free karaoke player written in Python. You can use it to play
your collection of CDG, MIDI and MPEG karaoke songs. Upstream homepage is at
http://www.kibosh.org/pykaraoke/
PyKaraoke is actually a GUI frontend which controls three libraries, pycdg for
CDG files, pykar for MIDI/KAR fi
On Tue, 07 Feb 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
> Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Just a word of caution here: If the administrator has modified the
> > file, you should not rename or move it, as they may know better
> > than you what they're doing. A proper course of action would be
> > warn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all!
As some of you may already know from -devel, I've adopted opendchub
recently from Grzegorz Prokopski (gadek), and now I've finished
packaging the new version which fixes a few bugs and updates the
autotools stuff.
As usual, here's the standar
Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Right. The problem is that it's not always easy to know if the file
> will no longer be read at all; you can't assume that the administrator
> has left in place your default configuration system.
Of course the maintainer should know their package. If th
Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> PyKaraoke is a free karaoke player written in Python.
If that's meant to be the start of the long description, please drop the
"written in Python", because it's not interesting, and for those who
want to know that nevertheless, the information is in the d
On Tue, 07 Feb 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
> Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Right. The problem is that it's not always easy to know if the file
> > will no longer be read at all; you can't assume that the administrator
> > has left in place your default configuration system.
>
> Of
Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Feb 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
>> Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > Right. The problem is that it's not always easy to know if the file
>> > will no longer be read at all; you can't assume that the administrator
>> > has left in
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 11:35:01AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Feb 2006, Frank K?ster wrote:
> > Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Right. The problem is that it's not always easy to know if the file
> > > will no longer be read at all; you can't assume that the admini
On Tue, 07 Feb 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
> Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 07 Feb 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
> >> Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Right. The problem is that it's not always easy to know if the file
> >> > will no longer be read at all; you c
Stan Vasilyev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a situation with a Debian package xdialog:
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/x/xdialog.html
>
> The upstream author, Thierry Godefroy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, insists on keeping
> the debian changes inside the upstream tarball, orig.tar.gz. This
> com
--- Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Only the frontend seems to be using libwxgtk-python, so I'm planning to
> separate it into two different binary packages, one with the command line
> programs (and less dependencies, no wx) and another one, depending on it,
> with
> the frontend.
I'v
On Tuesday 07 February 2006 13:15, Jari Aalto wrote:
> Is the upstream using a VCS? (Version control software)?
>
> 1) If he is, can he grant you a direct write access. That would be the
> easiest.
>
> 2) Can he be persuaded into using distributed SCM[1]? That way both of
> you can synchroniz
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 12:28:39AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Feb 2006, Frank K?ster wrote:
> > Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Just a word of caution here: If the administrator has modified the
> > > file, you should not rename or move it, as they may know better
> > >
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 11:47:49PM +0100, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 12:28:39AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > On Tue, 07 Feb 2006, Frank K?ster wrote:
> > > Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Just a word of caution here: If the administrator has modified the
> > > >
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 04:47:30AM -0200, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> Hi mentors!
>
> I have a doubt.
>
> I am creating a package of a Firefox/Mozilla extension. Upstream
> author reselases two .xpi files, one for Firefox and another for
> Mozilla. Since they are small, I was wanting to create
17 matches
Mail list logo
