Re: Question about rules file

2006-03-11 Thread Martin Kelly
Got it, thanks. Russ Allbery wrote: Martin Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I will look over all the suggestions. They help clear up some confusions I was having. So, subdirectories in ./debian/ is how you specify where to install everything? To install some files in /usr/sbin, I just put

Re: Non-Debian packaging practice

2006-03-11 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > The possible exception is in combination with gnulib, but this seems > inconsistent, since most people I've asked, who know "about" autofoo, > don't know what gnulib is. But I'd love to understand more than I do. > > There are now projects that want to use autotools because it is > "right

Re: manpage-has-errors-from-man usr/share/man/man1/picprog.1.gz

2006-03-11 Thread Jan Wagemakers
Erik Schanze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schreef: [ä in man page] > You shuld escape umlauts in manpages. > Please see groff_char(7). Interesting. Thanks for pointing me to that man page! -- Met vriendelijke groetjes - Jan Wagemakers - ... http://janw.wisclub.org/

Re: manpage-has-errors-from-man usr/share/man/man1/picprog.1.gz

2006-03-11 Thread Jan Wagemakers
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schreef: [ä in man page] >> How should I handle this? I can modify picprog.1, but the ä is used in >> the name of the programmer of picprog (Jaakko Hyvätti) so I don't know >> if that is really a good idea? > Replace ä with \[:a]. Great! I have fixed picprog.1 an

Re: Question about rules file

2006-03-11 Thread Russ Allbery
Martin Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I will look over all the suggestions. They help clear up some confusions > I was having. > So, subdirectories in ./debian/ is how you specify where to install > everything? To install some files in /usr/sbin, I just put those files > in ./debian/usr/sbin

Re: Question about rules file

2006-03-11 Thread Martin Kelly
I will look over all the suggestions. They help clear up some confusions I was having. So, subdirectories in ./debian/ is how you specify where to install everything? To install some files in /usr/sbin, I just put those files in ./debian/usr/sbin? If so, that is very nice and simple. Thanks

em8300 driver, module packaging, device nodes, firmware, and other questions

2006-03-11 Thread Brendon Higgins
Hi, Mentors! I'm helping out Nicolas Boullis with the em8300 packages. This is an out-of-tree kernel module and utilities to make use of Creative DXR3 and Sigma Designs Hollywood+ DVD decoders cards. I've been discussing with Nicolas various things about the packages while trying to make a package

Re: Question about rules file

2006-03-11 Thread Volker Grabsch
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 02:19:02PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > > I edited the Makefile to install into DESTDIR and defined DESTDIR to be > > /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/kernel/wireless so that should work. [...] > You almost certainly don't want to be using uname -r. [...] > You probably want to use

Re: manpage-has-errors-from-man usr/share/man/man1/picprog.1.gz

2006-03-11 Thread Russ Allbery
Jan Wagemakers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In this manpage the character "ä" is used twice. When I change those ä's > with a "a" the warnings disappear. > My question : > How should I handle this? I can modify picprog.1, but the ä is used in > the name of the programmer of picprog (Jaakko Hyvä

Re: Question about rules file

2006-03-11 Thread Russ Allbery
Martin Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am creating a package for the of rtl8180-sa2400 drivers > (http://sourceforge.net/projects/rtl8180-sa2400) and I have a question > about editing the rules file in debian/ in the source archive after > dh_make. > I wish for the package to install some f

Re: Non-Debian packaging practice

2006-03-11 Thread Russ Allbery
Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Some convenient interface for doing whatever has to be done; in the case > of shell scripts, just provide a makefile or shscript, or python or > whatever you prefer which accepts PREFIX or DESTDIR or whatever.. > It doesn't matter so much if it is #! /b

Re: manpage-has-errors-from-man usr/share/man/man1/picprog.1.gz

2006-03-11 Thread Erik Schanze
Hi Jan Jan Wagemakers Jan Wagemakers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > | pts/3 jan ~/deb$ lintian picprog_1.8-1_i386.changes > | W: picprog: manpage-has-errors-from-man > | usr/share/man/man1/picprog.1.gz 44: warning: can't find numbered > | character 195 pts/3 jan ~/deb$ > > > In this manpage the cha

Re: Non-Debian packaging practice

2006-03-11 Thread Russ Allbery
Joe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm not sure why people don't like the autotools. They generally work > very well. The makefiles they make are even able to re-run the > autotools to update itself when needed! They generally work well. They're painfully slow. When using Autoconf, I have

manpage-has-errors-from-man usr/share/man/man1/picprog.1.gz

2006-03-11 Thread Jan Wagemakers
Hello, I have build a deb-package for picprog 1.8[*]. However, when I run lintian, I get this error: | pts/3 jan ~/deb$ lintian picprog_1.8-1_i386.changes | W: picprog: manpage-has-errors-from-man usr/share/man/man1/picprog.1.gz 44: warning: can't find numbered character 195 | pts/3 jan ~

Re: RFS: nmzmail -- indexes and searches email in maildir folders, especially mutt

2006-03-11 Thread Kevin Coyner
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 11:52:23AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote.. > > > > > + -$(MAKE) distclean is evil, see Branden's bug against > > > > > lintian. > > > Did you look into this? It is #325372. > > > > Yes I did, and in all honesty did not follow it 100%. But that > > said, I've rewritte

Re: Non-Debian packaging practice

2006-03-11 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 07:00:12PM -, StealthMonger wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 10:35:22PM -, StealthMonger wrote: > > > > Is there a document describing software packaging good pract

Re: Non-Debian packaging practice

2006-03-11 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 01:41:54PM -0500, Joe Smith wrote: > "Junichi Uekawa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Hi, > > > >>Is there a document describing software packaging good practices for > >>general use, not specific to Debian, preferably in electronic form? >

Re: Non-Debian packaging practice

2006-03-11 Thread StealthMonger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 10:35:22PM -, StealthMonger wrote: > > Is there a document describing software packaging good practices for > > general use, not specific to Debian, preferably in electronic form

Re: Question about rules file

2006-03-11 Thread Ben Hutchings
Martin Kelly wrote: > I am creating a package for the of rtl8180-sa2400 drivers > (http://sourceforge.net/projects/rtl8180-sa2400) and I have a question > about editing the rules file in debian/ in the source archive after dh_make. > > I wish for the package to install some files in three places:

Re: RFC/RFS: beef - a flexible BrainFuck interpreter

2006-03-11 Thread Neil McGovern
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 11:27:14PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > I just released a new version of beef, and created a new Debian package. > [snip] > > Any comment is welcome. A sponsor, even more. > It's all fine, uploaded. I personally have no problem with the use of the word 'brainfuck' in

Re: Non-Debian packaging practice

2006-03-11 Thread Joe Smith
"Junichi Uekawa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, Is there a document describing software packaging good practices for general use, not specific to Debian, preferably in electronic form? You might be looking for autoconf/automake (although it's a bit rusty, an

Re: Question about rules file

2006-03-11 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 09:51:36AM -0800, Martin Kelly wrote: > I am creating a package for the of rtl8180-sa2400 drivers > (http://sourceforge.net/projects/rtl8180-sa2400) and I have a question > about editing the rules file in debian/ in the source archive after dh_make. > > I wish for the packa

Requesting upload sponsor

2006-03-11 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
Hello, I have updated a few of my packages. Since I have not been able to get a hold of my AM, I would appreciate it if some kind DD would upload the packages here: http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto/debian/uploads/ All of the packages were built in a pbuilder and are lintian clean. Regards,

Question about rules file

2006-03-11 Thread Martin Kelly
I am creating a package for the of rtl8180-sa2400 drivers (http://sourceforge.net/projects/rtl8180-sa2400) and I have a question about editing the rules file in debian/ in the source archive after dh_make. I wish for the package to install some files in three places: 1. /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/k

Re: RFS: nmzmail -- indexes and searches email in maildir folders, especially mutt

2006-03-11 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 11:47:10AM -0500, Kevin Coyner wrote: > On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 09:18:55AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote.. > > > > > + -$(MAKE) distclean is evil, see Branden's bug against > > > > lintian. > > Did you look into this? It is #325372. > > Yes I did, and in all honesty did

Re: RFS: nmzmail -- indexes and searches email in maildir folders, especially mutt

2006-03-11 Thread Kevin Coyner
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 09:18:55AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote.. > > > + -$(MAKE) distclean is evil, see Branden's bug against > > > lintian. > Did you look into this? It is #325372. Yes I did, and in all honesty did not follow it 100%. But that said, I've rewritten my rules file and now

Re: RFS: nmzmail -- indexes and searches email in maildir folders, especially mutt

2006-03-11 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 09:06:57AM -0500, Kevin Coyner wrote: > On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 10:57:07PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote.. > > > I would suggest to Enhances: mutt, in addition to suggesting it. > > Also the homepage field is supposedly supposed to be indented with > > an extra space. > >

Re: RFS: nmzmail -- indexes and searches email in maildir folders, especially mutt

2006-03-11 Thread Kevin Coyner
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 10:57:07PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote.. > I would suggest to Enhances: mutt, in addition to suggesting it. > Also the homepage field is supposedly supposed to be indented with > an extra space. > > + -$(MAKE) distclean is evil, see Branden's bug against lintian. >

Re: RFC/RFS: bcpp - C(++) beautifier

2006-03-11 Thread Alexander Schmehl
Hi Miry! * Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060308 08:50]: > > - debian/control: You could add the Upstream Homepage (as described in > > the developers reference [1]) > Is it worth mentioning the home page in the description, even when that home > page has not extra relevant information apart

Re: Non-Debian packaging practice

2006-03-11 Thread Bas Wijnen
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 10:35:22PM -, StealthMonger wrote: > Is there a document describing software packaging good practices for > general use, not specific to Debian, preferably in electronic form? Policy describes how Debian packages should look. If you don't intend to get the package into

Re: Non-Debian packaging practice

2006-03-11 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > Is there a document describing software packaging good practices for > general use, not specific to Debian, preferably in electronic form? You might be looking for autoconf/automake (although it's a bit rusty, and quite a few people loathe it, it's one working current standard we have). Au

Re: Non-Debian packaging practice

2006-03-11 Thread Craig Small
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 10:35:22PM -, StealthMonger wrote: > Debian discourages creating Debian-native packages: "This type of > packaging is only appropriate for the debian-specific packages, which > will never be useful in another distribution." [1] But creating it > for other distributions