On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 09:56:18PM +0700, Ivan Dubrov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm looking for a sponsor for subclipse (ITP: #238733) and several related
> packages (cdbs-eclipse is used for building the subclipse package itself and
> other packages are libraries used by subclipse). All packages pass
>
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xfardic".
* Package name : xfardic
Version : 0.7.5+cvs20060604-2
Upstream Author : Alan Baghumian, Armen Baghumian
* URL : http://sf.net/projects/xfardic/
* License
On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 13:31 -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> I kept the same version.
You should instead change the upstream version to 1.0.14.dfsg.1, the
other option is to rename the source package to pyepl-dfsg, but that is
generally not preferred, since renaming source packages can be annoy
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 07:07:10PM +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 12:46:37AM -0500, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> >sawfish, a window manager implemented in lisp, has been orphaned by its
> >previous maintainer (#373702)
> >
> >I would like to adopt it,
>
> I
"Adam Borowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The ITP is #213361. The package is foo-clean; the packaging is
trivial (clean autotoolage).
What is this foo package you keep talking about?
I know of lintian, linda, puiparts, but not foo.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
Dear Mentors,
I need a sponsor for kmobiletools_0.4.3.3-1, this version of the package
relies on CDBS, it is lintian and linda clean.
KMobileTools is already in the archive, this is just a new upstream
version.
You can find the source package on
http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist
Adam Borowski wrote:
> I'm looking for a sponsor for tcng, another package of Matthias Urlichs
> that I'm adopting.
Uploaded.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Adam Borowski wrote:
> I'm adopting "hashalot", one of the packages Matthias Urlichs recently
> gave away. He doesn't have the time nowadays, so it would be nice if
> someone could sponsor this package.
Uploaded.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
> > only linda is unhappy about non-free font in the upstream tarball
> If linda is correct about there being a non-free font in the upstream
> tarball, then you will need to repack the upstream tarball and
> document that you have done so. See the devref for how.
you've triggered the action ;-) I
> On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 13:25 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > I am in the same situation with some debian-med packages, and I ended up
> > adding myself in Uploaders. I think that it is important that the users
> > have a clue that there are real persons which take care of the packages.
> Yes, and
Hallo Ben,
Ben Hutchings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jörg Sommer wrote:
>> Hallo Goswin,
>>
>> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Just make sure to use a version that sorts lower than a future actual
>> > 2.2 release. Optimaly 2.2~beta2 would be used but I think the DAK
>> > st
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 01:18:05AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> I'm looking for a sponsor for tcng, another package of Matthias Urlichs
> that I'm adopting.
> RC bugs:
[...]
> * conflict for the binary name "tcc", also found in the package
> "tcc"; it's RC per Policy 10.1. The upstream renamed
Grrmpfff...
Florent Rougon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would be very surprised to know why.
^
interested (of course)
And yes, surprised if that was true.
--
Florent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's my understanding that test ! is more portable than ! test (same
> for [ !).
I would be very surprised to know why.
--
Florent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 02:33:11PM -0400, Hubert Chan wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 09:59:40 -0400, Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > dpatch uses a "patch patch" format, where the first column is all
> > pluses; they're really ugly.
>
> I don't know what version of dpatch you're using,
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 12:31:06PM +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 01:48:07PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 11:25:19AM +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> > > ! test -e patch-stamp || \
> >
> > I suppose you mean
> > test ! -e patch-stamp || \
>
> Doesn't
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 01:48:07PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 11:25:19AM +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> > ! test -e patch-stamp || \
>
> I suppose you mean
> test ! -e patch-stamp || \
Doesn't really matter, does it?
> Also, your method doesn't always allow to reco
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 11:25:19AM +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> ! test -e patch-stamp || \
I suppose you mean
test ! -e patch-stamp || \
Also, your method doesn't always allow to recover from an aborted build.
Thanks,
Bas
--
I encourage people to send encrypted e-mail (see http://
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 09:59:40AM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > Do you just have to hardcode all the "patch" commands into
> > debian/rules?
> Some people do this ("cat debian/patches/* |patch -p1 && touch
> ./patched"), but it is generally not encouraged. In particular,
> related patches need
On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 13:25 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I am in the same situation with some debian-med packages, and I ended up
> adding myself in Uploaders. I think that it is important that the users
> have a clue that there are real persons which take care of the packages.
Yes, and I would
Hello -mentors,
The bug #335278 is relatively easy, but has been neglected for quite
long
time. I sent a patch to bts and contacted maintainer, but got no feedback
after being waiting for a reasonable timeframe. Thus, I prepared a non-DD
NMU:
ftp://ftp.uni-sofia.bg/debian-addons-bg/di
* Ben Hutchings ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060620 10:42]:
> Jari Aalto+mail.linux wrote:
> > * Mon 2006-06-19 Justin Pryzby
> > * Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > At this point you should probably learn to use dpkg v2 source
> > > archives, which allow patches without "third party" patch applying
> >
Jari Aalto+mail.linux wrote:
> * Mon 2006-06-19 Justin Pryzby
> * Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > At this point you should probably learn to use dpkg v2 source
> > archives, which allow patches without "third party" patch applying
> > code (and build deps).
> >
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "flamerobin".
This is my second call, first (a week ago)[1] resulted in some
comments (thanks Thijs, Kari, Justin), all resolved.
* Package name: flamerobin
Version : 0.7.2-7
Upstream authors: The Flamerobin Development Team
On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 02:36 -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> only linda is unhappy about non-free font in the upstream
> tarball
If linda is correct about there being a non-free font in the upstream
tarball, then you will need to repack the upstream tarball and document
that you have done so. S
25 matches
Mail list logo
